Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335235 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2200 on: August 22, 2016, 11:57:02 AM »
And that appears to be a common practice.

Colin Powell had a separate email for private emails and classified emails and didn't house his own server. It's quite a bit different than what Hillary was doing.
Ok. I didn't know that. In no way am I attempting to absolve Clinton of anything. I would just be less enraged if it has been the practice of SOS for a while.

"everyone's doing it" is not an acceptable defense to breaking the law.
I agree. But if it had been going for decades (apparently it hasn't), I'd be wanting the heads of the other SOS as well and my anger would be more spread out and less focused on Clinton

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2201 on: August 22, 2016, 11:59:42 AM »
SDK, to be fair, you said earlier this year you want Hillary, because she's a chick and it would be making history. Forgive me for not taking your hot political takes seriously.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2202 on: August 22, 2016, 12:00:40 PM »
It's easy to forget that the internet is a relatively new thing and standards for net security have changed a lot over the years. There really aren't many other secretaries of state that used email as a major form of communication. Powell might be the only fair comparison.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2203 on: August 22, 2016, 12:01:25 PM »
SDK, to be fair, you said earlier this year you want Hillary, because she's a chick and it would be making history. Forgive me for not taking your hot political takes seriously.
I've also said I hate them both. I know it will be one or the other. Both suck ass. But if they were equals, I don't think they are, I'd vote Hillary for those reasons. I wish neither one of them were on the ballot. But it is what it is and I vote.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2204 on: August 22, 2016, 12:02:52 PM »
Also, I forgive you. We are diametrically opposed on a lot of things. I wouldn't know who you were if you gave credence to my posts.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2205 on: August 22, 2016, 12:03:07 PM »

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2206 on: August 22, 2016, 12:03:46 PM »
Wacky, did you see my sweet latitude burn?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36686
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2207 on: August 22, 2016, 12:05:11 PM »
It's easy to forget that the internet is a relatively new thing and standards for net security have changed a lot over the years. There really aren't many other secretaries of state that used email as a major form of communication. Powell might be the only fair comparison.

Wouldn't be surprised if this is a reason Condi won't run.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2208 on: August 22, 2016, 12:11:08 PM »
Wacky, did you see my sweet latitude burn?
I did. It still doesn't make sense to me. University of Miami is south of FIU.  :curse: I wasn't trying to be mean fwiw.  :cheers:

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2209 on: August 22, 2016, 12:27:33 PM »
Wacky, did you see my sweet latitude burn?
I did. It still doesn't make sense to me. University of Miami is south of FIU.  :curse: I wasn't trying to be mean fwiw.  :cheers:
I know you weren't. Latitude is tricky. I always thought Maine was farther north than Montana. But nope.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2210 on: August 22, 2016, 12:44:50 PM »
It's easy to forget that the internet is a relatively new thing and standards for net security have changed a lot over the years. There really aren't many other secretaries of state that used email as a major form of communication. Powell might be the only fair comparison.

I don't think you've thought this all the way through.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2211 on: August 22, 2016, 12:52:50 PM »
The use of a seperate email account and server for state business is egregious in its own right, notwithstanding that it was used to transmit confidential information in violation of federal law.

Then, she proceeded to have roughly 2/3 of the emails on that server destroyed prior to turning it over to authorities, claiming they were personal in nature. Not only is that criminal, but we also know it is a lie.

How anyone could bring themself to vote for this person is mind boggling. Her actions and judgment in this single ordeal while SOS (disregarding the train wreck that was her tenure as SOS) render her patently unfit for the  office of president.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2212 on: August 22, 2016, 12:55:06 PM »
Not that it can't be hacked, it can, but using an email service from a vendor of note is a lot more safe then having an email server tucked away in a toilet closet with no firewall and a domain hosted in New Zealand.

Ignore SDK, the IT illiterate.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2213 on: August 22, 2016, 12:58:01 PM »
200 plus days since Hillary was directly Q&A'd by any reporter(s).


Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2214 on: August 22, 2016, 01:07:13 PM »
Not that it can't be hacked, it can, but using an email service from a vendor of note is a lot more safe then having an email server tucked away in a toilet closet with no firewall and a domain hosted in New Zealand.

Ignore SDK, the IT illiterate.
Oh dax, you are right.

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2215 on: August 22, 2016, 01:47:59 PM »
Wacky, did you see my sweet latitude burn?
I did. It still doesn't make sense to me. University of Miami is south of FIU.  :curse: I wasn't trying to be mean fwiw.  :cheers:
I know you weren't. Latitude is tricky. I always thought Maine was farther north than Montana. But nope.

Yeah, maps are weird. The ones we are used to seeing distort reality.

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2216 on: August 22, 2016, 02:29:15 PM »
You're still talking about the emails, huh?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21452
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2217 on: August 22, 2016, 02:46:50 PM »
So whatever conservative group deposed Clinton and her lawyer agreed that she would answer questions in writing.  I don't understand what is going on.  Random groups can just depose people?  Isn't that the job of prosecutors, district attorneys or whoever else?

I'm not sure what you're talking about, but in the case of a civil lawsuit, either party may seek to depose anyone with personal knowledge of the controversy. Depositions are just part of the discovery phase in civil and criminal proceedings.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2218 on: August 22, 2016, 03:11:34 PM »
So whatever conservative group deposed Clinton and her lawyer agreed that she would answer questions in writing.  I don't understand what is going on.  Random groups can just depose people?  Isn't that the job of prosecutors, district attorneys or whoever else?

I'm not sure what you're talking about, but in the case of a civil lawsuit, either party may seek to depose anyone with personal knowledge of the controversy. Depositions are just part of the discovery phase in civil and criminal proceedings.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/19/politics/judge-denies-request-to-depose-clinton/

This is what I am talking about.  What proceeding are these people trying to depose her for?

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21452
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2219 on: August 22, 2016, 03:19:56 PM »
So whatever conservative group deposed Clinton and her lawyer agreed that she would answer questions in writing.  I don't understand what is going on.  Random groups can just depose people?  Isn't that the job of prosecutors, district attorneys or whoever else?

I'm not sure what you're talking about, but in the case of a civil lawsuit, either party may seek to depose anyone with personal knowledge of the controversy. Depositions are just part of the discovery phase in civil and criminal proceedings.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/19/politics/judge-denies-request-to-depose-clinton/

This is what I am talking about.  What proceeding are these people trying to depose her for?

Sounds like it's a FOIA lawsuit, presumably against the State Department.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2220 on: August 22, 2016, 03:45:40 PM »
She is a liar or truly forgets things do to dementia.  These accounts today of Huma giving special preferential access SOS Hillary for big donors to the Clinton Foundation is damning.

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2221 on: August 22, 2016, 07:23:09 PM »
Spracs is really blossoming into a great internet lawyer :love:

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21452
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2222 on: August 22, 2016, 08:14:21 PM »
Not too shabby offline, either. Have you even seen my GPA, bro?   :driving:

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2223 on: August 22, 2016, 09:10:13 PM »
is it even better than those pre-mcats scores  :Wha:

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd