Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335452 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2125 on: August 15, 2016, 02:05:25 PM »
Man. What must it be like to spend a day in the life of dax?


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2126 on: August 15, 2016, 02:16:52 PM »
Why do Hillbots get mad about things that are being reported in the MSM?

Weird, but I guess that's just the internal conflict(s) of supporting such immense corruption lashing out.



Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2127 on: August 15, 2016, 04:24:00 PM »
Kaine already taking marching orders from Soros family.

Business as usual.


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2128 on: August 15, 2016, 07:41:56 PM »

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2129 on: August 15, 2016, 07:46:25 PM »
Trump wants guests of the country who preach hate (i.e. anti-gay, repression of women, repression of other races and religions) to be removed from the country.

His opponent:  Huge fan and supporter (and politically indebted to)  the most anti-gay misogynistic regimes and individuals in the world. 


Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2130 on: August 15, 2016, 07:57:25 PM »
Do another one, dax. I'm bored.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2131 on: August 15, 2016, 07:58:05 PM »
Dax is not a fan of the first amendment

Sad
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2132 on: August 15, 2016, 08:01:54 PM »
Trump will create that safe space for you Dax, don't worry. We can't have you getting triggered from seeing/hearing brown people
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2133 on: August 15, 2016, 08:05:08 PM »
lib has reading comprehension issues

lib really loves a person who takes millions from the most repressive regimes in the world.   


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2134 on: August 15, 2016, 08:06:18 PM »
I'm lib7 and I support non-citizen racists and misogynists!!


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2135 on: August 16, 2016, 09:03:56 AM »
Soros emails translated:  Continue perpetual war, so that there's a perpetual refugee crisis.

What humanitarians. 


Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2136 on: August 16, 2016, 09:05:43 AM »
Dax, even you have to admit that most ppl that have money enough to influence war and whatnot want to continue what we have been doing, right?

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2137 on: August 16, 2016, 09:12:17 AM »
I would think they'd want to continue unless they discover an easier way to make money.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2138 on: August 16, 2016, 09:28:58 AM »
I would think they'd want to continue unless they discover an easier way to make money.

The only easier way would be if they could print it. 

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2139 on: August 16, 2016, 09:38:57 AM »
good lord, you idiots.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2140 on: August 16, 2016, 10:49:11 AM »
Oh look sys cryptic strikes again with nothing, as usual.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2141 on: August 16, 2016, 10:53:38 AM »
Oh look sys cryptic strikes again with nothing, as usual.

You might be the least self-aware person on the planet  :lol:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2142 on: August 16, 2016, 10:56:03 AM »
Oh look sys cryptic strikes again with nothing, as usual.

You might be the least self-aware person on the planet  :lol:

Your shtick is rather old and tired and when are you going to "get it".

Put down the bong!

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2143 on: August 16, 2016, 10:56:54 AM »
Oh look sys cryptic strikes again with nothing, as usual.

i don't like to put a lot of effort into a post that may or may not get any response.  if someone engages me, i'll usually put in a little effort, but not for an observation just cast into the waters.

at any rate, my comment wasn't directed at you, if you care.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2144 on: August 16, 2016, 10:57:51 AM »
Oh look sys cryptic strikes again with nothing, as usual.

i don't like to put a lot of effort into a post that may or may not get any response.  if someone engages me, i'll usually put in a little effort, but not for an observation just cast into the waters.

at any rate, my comment wasn't directed at you, if you care.

I know. 

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2145 on: August 16, 2016, 11:01:39 AM »
good lord, you idiots.

I admittedly can be an idiot at times.  I know you have posted two articles on money and it's actual vs perceived effects.  This must be a good example of when I am indeed an idiot because I can't help to wonder why very rich ppl continue to throw money away if it doesn't buy them things such as no bid contracts(haliburton), some sort of favorable benefit as pork in legislation, or possibly a slight policy advantage that benefits their business, etc. 

I mean, if you are a billionaire, you didn't get there by throwing money away for nothing.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2146 on: August 16, 2016, 11:02:35 AM »
Oh look sys cryptic strikes again with nothing, as usual.

You might be the least self-aware person on the planet  :lol:

Your shtick is rather old and tired and when are you going to "get it".

Put down the bong!

You might be the least self-aware person on the planet  :lol:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2147 on: August 16, 2016, 11:03:10 AM »
Soros' control (as evidenced by emails) seems to be on par with what the whack-a-doodles claim (unsubstantiated by emails) the Koch Bros. control over the RNC is. Yet, in a completely unsurprising and predictable display of egregious hypocrisy, they maintain Soros' control is no biggie.  :flush:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2148 on: August 16, 2016, 11:03:33 AM »
#facepalm

Such flailing, so sad.

Poor lib does try hard, tho

#tennismatchclap

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2149 on: August 16, 2016, 11:05:24 AM »
Soros' control (as evidenced by emails) seems to be on par with what the whack-a-doodles claim (unsubstantiated by emails) the Koch Bros. control over the RNC is. Yet, in a completely unsurprising and predictable display of egregious hypocrisy, they maintain Soros' control is no biggie.  :flush:

Soro's is an austerity/death ghoul posing as a humanitarian.  A special kind of despicable person who supports despicable people.