Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335515 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1000 on: January 20, 2016, 03:16:04 PM »
Odd that the two leadings candidates for both parties favor stricter border control. It's almost like that's a winning issue of bipartisan agreement among many republican and democrat voters.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1001 on: January 20, 2016, 04:14:58 PM »
The "Weiner" movie will be final nail in MG's coffin.  The story of how MG helped Huma through a stiff peroid of her life as her man's political life was deflated by his sorid contact with gals of the sisterhood supposedly is a killer of her ambitions.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7639
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1002 on: January 20, 2016, 04:23:04 PM »
Really the media seems to have picked an old white man with hair that looks like piss colored cotton candy and hates mexicans

I'd say Bernie's hair is more white than yellow. His teeth are yellow, tho.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1003 on: January 20, 2016, 04:46:32 PM »
Msnbc is now reporting on this. Does that mean it's still part of the vast right wing conspiracy.

It just means the media prefer Bernie to Hillary.

2008 all over again for Hillary.

Except this time the media's chosen candidate is a cranky white septuagenarian self-avowed socialist, as opposed to a young black telegenic closet socialist.

Wait, the media is now a shill for Bernie?
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1004 on: January 20, 2016, 10:02:26 PM »
Enforcing immigration laws = hating Mexicans iff you're a pub?????????

Interesting indeed
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1005 on: January 21, 2016, 12:56:11 PM »
The Weiner Scandal.  Two guys have produced a dooucementary about the rise and fall of Weiner, Anthony that is.  People who saw an early draft said it shows team Mean Granny telling wife Huma to cut ties with Tony Weiner.  HUMA is MG's closet aid, and is married to Weiner man who sextet women lewd messages about his happydandlers.  Interesting why MG offered this advice given Bill the Raper's sorid feats.   Not much of a sister in Association of the Hood of Tough Hides.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1006 on: January 21, 2016, 12:59:18 PM »
Easy, hill had something to gain by maintaining Bill.  Weiner's wife doesn't have near the incentive.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1007 on: January 21, 2016, 07:29:14 PM »
Odd that the two leadings candidates for both parties favor stricter border control. It's almost like that's a winning issue of bipartisan agreement among many republican and democrat voters.

Who the hell is against stricter border control? The disconnect is how much to spend and what to do with the undocumented.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1008 on: January 21, 2016, 08:22:35 PM »
Odd that the two leadings candidates for both parties favor stricter border control. It's almost like that's a winning issue of bipartisan agreement among many republican and democrat voters.

Who the hell is against stricter border control? The disconnect is how much to spend and what to do with the undocumented.

:lol: "I'm totally for strict border control! But everyone who already broke the law should become a citizen. But we need strict border control!!!"
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1009 on: January 21, 2016, 08:35:16 PM »
FSD we gotta post transfer order in here for you :lol:
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1010 on: January 21, 2016, 09:01:57 PM »
What if Hilrod has a colonel stand before congress and take the hit and then pursue a lucrative career on MSNBC complaining about how the right is a bunch of dishonest people who hate America?
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30434
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1011 on: January 21, 2016, 09:06:57 PM »
Have you ever listened to her talk for any length of time?   It wouldn't make it one season.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1012 on: January 22, 2016, 07:52:44 AM »
Odd that the two leadings candidates for both parties favor stricter border control. It's almost like that's a winning issue of bipartisan agreement among many republican and democrat voters.

Who the hell is against stricter border control? The disconnect is how much to spend and what to do with the undocumented.

:lol: "I'm totally for strict border control! But everyone who already broke the law should become a citizen. But we need strict border control!!!"

All things considered, conservatives should have an issue with mass deportation considering the amount of government needed and the extreme costs that would be incurred. It makes no sense to on one hand complain about the amount of debt we have then on the other hand try to get rid of millions of potential tax payers. I would think it would be much more advantageous to a conservative to use our resources for getting these undocumented workers official.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1013 on: January 22, 2016, 07:57:12 AM »
FSD we gotta post transfer order in here for you :lol:

Your stupid ass would think that. Immigration and border security is in no way a liberal versus conservative issue. Have you watched a republican debate? Have you seen the deportation numbers of the current president? I don't even know why I'm asking as you're either the first or second stupidest sonofabitch posting in the pit.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1014 on: January 22, 2016, 09:32:58 AM »
Odd that the two leadings candidates for both parties favor stricter border control. It's almost like that's a winning issue of bipartisan agreement among many republican and democrat voters.

Who the hell is against stricter border control? The disconnect is how much to spend and what to do with the undocumented.

:lol: "I'm totally for strict border control! But everyone who already broke the law should become a citizen. But we need strict border control!!!"

All things considered, conservatives should have an issue with mass deportation considering the amount of government needed and the extreme costs that would be incurred. It makes no sense to on one hand complain about the amount of debt we have then on the other hand try to get rid of millions of potential tax payers. I would think it would be much more advantageous to a conservative to use our resources for getting these undocumented workers official.

And there it is - the "mass deportation" strawman. Libs have such simple minds.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1015 on: January 22, 2016, 09:34:02 AM »
Isn't that why you hate rubio?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1016 on: January 22, 2016, 09:58:57 AM »
So do you want them to just remain in the US illegally?

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1017 on: January 22, 2016, 10:04:51 AM »
Isn't that why you hate rubio?

No. Rubio is my preferred candidate. I happen to disagree with him on his softer position on immigration, but not because I favor "mass deportation." That is completely unnecessary. Tighten up employer verification and sanctions for hiring illegal labor, tighten up benefits to illegal aliens, and they will self-deport. I even agree with selling work permits to illegal immigrants once we have tighter border security in place (which will fund enforcement efforts), provided that we end birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants. I simply disagree with any "path to citizenship" for people who have broken our laws. It is patently unfair to allow them to jump the line ahead of people who have followed the law. That's where I differ from Rubio.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1018 on: January 22, 2016, 10:05:15 AM »
So do you want them to just remain in the US illegally?

Again, such simple minds... :lol: See above.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1019 on: January 22, 2016, 10:06:11 AM »
If you sell them work permits, they aren't illegal anymore. That is amnesty.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1020 on: January 22, 2016, 10:17:40 AM »
 Have you noticed how mainstream lib media services are knipping at MG as it is revealed she had super secret information on her home brew server, and now is crying conspiracy between the top Inspector General and Republicans to leak information to damage her.  MG what is is when violating the espionage act?

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1021 on: January 22, 2016, 10:24:08 AM »
FSD we gotta post transfer order in here for you :lol:

Your stupid ass would think that. Immigration and border security is in no way a liberal versus conservative issue. Have you watched a republican debate? Have you seen the deportation numbers of the current president? I don't even know why I'm asking as you're either the first or second stupidest sonofabitch posting in the pit.

The presidents deportation numbers are notoriously unreliable.(they changed the way they are compiled)
I also recall the pubs having a requirement of securing the border before doing immigration reform, the Crats refused and reform died, but yeah I'm dumb :jerk:
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1022 on: January 22, 2016, 10:24:33 AM »
If you sell them work permits, they aren't illegal anymore. That is amnesty.

Sort of. The permits would expire and not be perpetually renewable, but it is certainly granting limited legal status. So if that is "amnesty" so be it. It helps fund the enforcement efforts without leaving certain industries in an immediate lurch. A reasonable and fiscally responsible compromise, in my opinion.

It is not in any way a "pathway to citizenship."
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1023 on: January 22, 2016, 10:30:09 AM »
Ksuw just can't stand the idea of brown citizens. MAAAAAYBE some brown quasi slaves, but def no brown citizens
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1024 on: January 22, 2016, 10:34:12 AM »
Ksuw just can't stand the idea of brown citizens. MAAAAAYBE some brown quasi slaves, but def no brown citizens

Uh huh. Keep on trollin.  :rolleyes:
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.