Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335196 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #925 on: January 09, 2016, 12:27:30 PM »
Yes, surprising position for a "moderate." I would think that for any rational person who is not a committed liberal ideologue, committing felonies to avoid open record requests and simultaneously exposing state secrets to hackers and foreign governments would be disqualifying for a presidential candidate. That is just an incredibly stupid, arrogant, corrupt, illegal thing to do.

Who the eff is the moderate you're referring to?

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #926 on: January 09, 2016, 12:33:15 PM »
I don't think anyone is going to answer, fsd.

Probably ought to tone back calling Cruz a hypocrit for a while.

I'm confused as to who you are calling a hypocrite here. Also for the record the search function confirms I have never called Rafael a hypocrite.

So he's a sociopath, but you aren't going to comment on hillary. Yeah, okay

Sorry but for me sending emails on an unsecured server doesn't rise to the level of using your own children as political pawns. Also I have never called Rafael a sociopath either, he's definitely a piece of crap though. Whatever Hilz did or didn't do with those servers doesn't rise to the level of sociopath, if you want to think she's a piece of crap, it's well within your right to do so.

Seriously? You think using kids in a spoof political ads is worse and more reprehensible than the secretary of state recklessly conducting national security business through a private email account, in violation of internal policy and the law, obfuscating the investigation by withholding and destroying evidence, and repeatedly lying about the whole thing?

That's a new rational, moral and competence low for the libtard

I mean you grossly simplified one of those situations and exaggerated the other but whatever that doesn't matter. Forgive me if I don't lose sleep because I fall short of the moral expectation of an anonymous internet user who can't help but to use the word tard in 60% of his posts.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #927 on: January 09, 2016, 01:15:20 PM »
Explain what's simplified and what's overstated, tard.

Just acknowledge you are a libtard lemming who takes the libtard side no matter how unconscionable and we can move on.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #928 on: January 09, 2016, 05:09:09 PM »
Grossly simplified?  :facepalm: I just can't with this guy.
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #929 on: January 10, 2016, 12:06:03 AM »
Grossly simplified?  :facepalm: I just can't with this guy.

Then don't [redacted] : dunno:

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #930 on: January 10, 2016, 03:48:56 PM »
So I'm sitting here getting ready for this Bernie speech and I was just invited to the Black & Brown Forum as a VIP tomorrow night, what would you guys like me to ask MG?

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #931 on: January 10, 2016, 03:56:34 PM »
So I'm sitting here getting ready for this Bernie speech and I was just invited to the Black & Brown Forum as a VIP tomorrow night, what would you guys like me to ask MG?

ask her what she plans to do about cops murdering citizens

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #932 on: January 10, 2016, 03:56:54 PM »
or the Patriot Act

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36686
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #933 on: January 10, 2016, 04:00:29 PM »
It doesn't matter.  She is versed in bullshit.

NSA over reach, campaign finance, and of course, aliens

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #934 on: January 10, 2016, 05:16:21 PM »
Like the questions won't be filtered with preprepared response. 

I'd like to know what it's like to be subject to an FBI investigation
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #935 on: January 10, 2016, 05:17:18 PM »
Like the questions won't be filtered with preprepared response. 

I'd like to know what it's like to be subject to an FBI investigation

this would be a fantastic question, omg
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36686
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #936 on: January 10, 2016, 05:33:02 PM »
Like the questions won't be filtered with preprepared response. 

I'd like to know what it's like to be subject to an FBI investigation

this would be a fantastic question, omg
Yes, please.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #937 on: January 10, 2016, 05:37:28 PM »
Not a terrible question FSD, not sure it fits the theme, we'll see how it goes.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #938 on: January 10, 2016, 05:54:56 PM »
If the nsa is topical, then the FBI thing is arguably relevant
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #939 on: January 10, 2016, 08:33:09 PM »
Let's see....

1. Don't you think it's kind of sexist to say that one reason people should vote for you is because you're a woman?
2. Do see any inconsistency in claiming to be a champion for women while staying married to a man who cheated on you in the Oval Office, and is accused by many other women of rape and sexual assault?
3. So when you say women alleging sexual assault have a right to be believed until the evidence proves otherwise, doesn't that mean the man should be believed to be guilty until the evidence shows he is innocent?
4. Do you still contend that the reason you get so many donations from Wall Street is because of 9/11?
5. What is the backup plan if you're indicted?
6. What's the difference between a socialist and a democrat? (Seriously, let's see if she has an answer by now.)
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #940 on: January 10, 2016, 08:56:03 PM »
Oh wait, I almost forgot the question every liberal politician should be asked, but hardly ever are: Should a woman be allowed to terminate her pregnancy at any point before birth as long as a doctor agrees?
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36686
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #941 on: January 10, 2016, 09:01:58 PM »
#5 would be great.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9558
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #942 on: January 10, 2016, 09:52:49 PM »
Let's see....

1. Don't you think it's kind of sexist to say that one reason people should vote for you is because you're a woman?
2. Do see any inconsistency in claiming to be a champion for women while staying married to a man who cheated on you in the Oval Office, and is accused by many other women of rape and sexual assault?
3. So when you say women alleging sexual assault have a right to be believed until the evidence proves otherwise, doesn't that mean the man should be believed to be guilty until the evidence shows he is innocent?
4. Do you still contend that the reason you get so many donations from Wall Street is because of 9/11?
5. What is the backup plan if you're indicted?
6. What's the difference between a socialist and a democrat? (Seriously, let's see if she has an answer by now.)

 :surprised:

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #943 on: January 10, 2016, 10:05:17 PM »
Can an indicted peon run for president?   Can a president pardon themselves?   Could a convicted president be impeached for past transgressions?  If MG is found guilty, but wins the general election, could the electoral college give her the shaft?

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #944 on: January 10, 2016, 10:52:25 PM »
those are great questions, renoman
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline lopakman

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2449
  • #1Wiggins
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #945 on: January 11, 2016, 07:55:45 AM »
Let's see....

1. Don't you think it's kind of sexist to say that one reason people should vote for you is because you're a woman?
2. Do see any inconsistency in claiming to be a champion for women while staying married to a man who cheated on you in the Oval Office, and is accused by many other women of rape and sexual assault?
3. So when you say women alleging sexual assault have a right to be believed until the evidence proves otherwise, doesn't that mean the man should be believed to be guilty until the evidence shows he is innocent?
4. Do you still contend that the reason you get so many donations from Wall Street is because of 9/11?
5. What is the backup plan if you're indicted?
6. What's the difference between a socialist and a democrat? (Seriously, let's see if she has an answer by now.)

 :thumbs:
@lopakman

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #946 on: January 11, 2016, 12:36:06 PM »
Sinking in the crap. Sinking in the crap. High ho the dairy oh, she's sinking in the crap.  MG's new campaign song.  Fox is reporting she is being investigated for corruption such as family enrichment through their foundation. Probably why she had a private email system not subject to freedom of information requests.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7637
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #947 on: January 11, 2016, 05:40:39 PM »
she isn't going to answer any questions.  :buh-bye:

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #948 on: January 12, 2016, 08:48:56 AM »
Not sure if MoveOn.org is relevant anymore, but its members just endorsed TSS.

http://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/51a6be097cf34fa9a965bd84dbacc028/sanders-campaign-endorsed-moveonorg
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #949 on: January 12, 2016, 09:29:20 AM »
Shoot. I guess you can scratch the Question 2 off the list. Hillary will not be answering any questions about Bill's alleged rapes and sexual assaults, or her role in covering them up. http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2016/01/11/clinton-declines-answer-questions-women-involved-sex-scandals/78656396/

She's still a champion for women's rights, though. I'm sure she's still married to Bill for Chelsea's sake, poor thing.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.