Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335373 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #875 on: January 07, 2016, 02:14:02 PM »
Hillary and Bernie are both old enough that it's kind of scary to imagine them running the country by the end of their first term.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #876 on: January 07, 2016, 02:16:36 PM »
70 is the new 68

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #877 on: January 07, 2016, 02:19:44 PM »
Is O'Malley just completely unlikable or something? It's kind of surprising to me that he wasn't able to pick up any steam at all against Bernie and Hillary. I've only seen him in one debate (was busy during the other debates that were intentionally scheduled for low viewership).

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #878 on: January 07, 2016, 02:30:12 PM »
I thought he was great in the last debate, he took on Hillary and Bernie and didn't back down. He is too establishment to be a sensation like Bernie, but he isn't Hillary so literally no one in the establishment is backing him. He has no money or ground game. He looks and sounds like generic politician x, and in this current climate of the democratic party, that has no place. The party needs to energize people other than the 40-65 middle class white male demo.

I also think there may be some stuff that the party knows about that is in his closet that they may be aware of, what that is, I have no idea, it's just blind speculation. If he isn't the vice presidential nominee then I will be convinced of this.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #879 on: January 07, 2016, 05:28:21 PM »
Where did Planned Hamburger get 20 million to support MG?   Why is blood money being accepted by Democrats?  Planned Hamburger has destroyed millions of unborn little girls in the name of woman libbers wanting non consequently sex.

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #880 on: January 08, 2016, 07:11:17 AM »
Where did Planned Hamburger get 20 million to support MG?   Why is blood money being accepted by Democrats?  Planned Hamburger has destroyed millions of unborn little girls in the name of woman libbers wanting non consequently sex.

But women's rights and all that. It's their choice if they murder other future SJWs, not some man in congress!

Offline Ptolemy

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 754
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #881 on: January 08, 2016, 08:51:46 AM »

But women's rights and all that. It's their choice if they murder other future SJWs, not some man in congress!

Then why can't men make that choice too, and order or stop an abortion of their children? What about equal protection; 14th Amendment to the Constitution?

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #882 on: January 08, 2016, 08:55:57 AM »
Great point 'lemy
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #883 on: January 08, 2016, 09:51:13 AM »
I'm glad you asked, check out this bad boy:

http://www.inquisitr.com/2683442/goodbye-vasectomy-hello-sperm-switch-men-can-turn-fertility-on-and-off-with-new-sperm-switch-invention/

Men will finally be able to step up their game in the contraception game!

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #884 on: January 08, 2016, 10:32:54 AM »
It is being reported in this last batch of released emails that MG received an email from at State Deptartment staffer who sent it via a private email account.  She questioned this and said it was not appropriate.  ??????

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #885 on: January 08, 2016, 01:04:33 PM »
It's worse than that. It looks like Hillary was having trouble getting a confidential doc via secure fax. She asked her director to send it via the private email server. He resisted based on it being classified. She responded that he should just strip off the classified header and email it.

That a felony, son. This could be it for her. Better re-draft Biden.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19761
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #887 on: January 08, 2016, 01:07:10 PM »
i can't believe the repulican party has no one that can beat hilary clinton.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #888 on: January 08, 2016, 01:08:34 PM »
hotair.com lol

Regresocons have the best blog names
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #889 on: January 08, 2016, 01:33:09 PM »
i can't believe the repulican party has no one that can beat hilary clinton.

I think many of the Republican candidates could beat Hillary if it came down to it. Rubio definitely. Probably Cruz and Trump, too, at this point.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #890 on: January 08, 2016, 01:35:35 PM »
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/state-department-releases-more-clinton-emails-several-marked-classified/

Quote
To comply with a court-ordered goal, the State Department made public about 3,000 pages of emails from Hillary Clinton's private server early Friday morning, including 66 messages that were later marked "classified" on some level.

On the campaign trail, the presidential candidate has insisted that no classified information was sent or received through her private email server.

But in one email exchange between Clinton and staffer Jake Sullivan from June 17, 2011, the then-secretary advised her aide on sending a set of talking points by email when he had trouble sending them through secure means.

Part of the exchange is redacted, so the context of the emails is unknown, but at one point, Sullivan tells Clinton that aides "say they've had issues sending secure fax. They're working on it."

Clinton responds, "If they can't, turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/09/us/hillary-clinton-email-state-department.html?_r=0

Quote
WASHINGTON — On a Friday morning in June 2011, as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton waited for a set of talking points to be faxed to her, a top aide told her the delay was due to problems sending faxes that would be secure from probing eyes.

“If they can’t, turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure,” Mrs. Clinton responded in an email released early Friday by the State Department, one of about 3,000 newly released pages of Mrs. Clinton’s emails from her time as secretary of state. Of those, 66 documents contained classified information.

The note she sent to a top aide, Jacob J. Sullivan, instructing him how to send sensitive information in a “nonsecure” way is heavily redacted, so it is unknown what the talking points were about. [Hey NYT - the purpose of redactions is to hide confidential information.]

But that and other messages provide a window into Mrs. Clinton’s approach to handling email and other communication — at times cavalier, at times calculated to ensure that they would not fall into the wrong hands. She even expressed some umbrage at an officer who, like herself, had used a personal email address for official business.

In February 2011, senior aides sent Mrs. Clinton a dispatch from the officer, John Godfrey, analyzing the situation in Libya. She asked whom he worked for. When told he was a State Department employee, she responded, “I was surprised that he used personal email account if he is at State.”  :lol: :lol: :lol:

Hillary is going to be indicted. Not even the facts that she is (a) Hillary Clinton, and (b) the Dem frontrunner, can save her now.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2016, 01:39:22 PM by K-S-U-Wildcats! »
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19761
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #891 on: January 08, 2016, 01:55:03 PM »
I bet she's not indicted

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #892 on: January 08, 2016, 02:23:56 PM »
The party of pathological liars as front runners and a I'll say anything to get elected candidate even if I totally model my ideals off of countries that are in reality moving Center-Right and in the process of reassessing their failed quests for socialists utopias (while being overrun with dangerous Middle Eastern Refugees) . . . will do anything to maintain power.

How . . . sad

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #893 on: January 08, 2016, 02:25:25 PM »
I bet she's not indicted

I mean, I want to know all about Area 51, too.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #894 on: January 08, 2016, 02:29:55 PM »
KSUW is frighteningly thirsty.

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #895 on: January 08, 2016, 02:54:28 PM »


That a felony, son. This could be it for her. Better re-draft Biden.

The word!
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #896 on: January 08, 2016, 02:58:42 PM »
I just checked cbsnews.com, abcnews.com, nbcnews.com, cnn.com, foxnews.com, washingtonpost.com, and nytimes.com this white hot, scathing Hillary story only appears on three of the sites.
1. 8th headline on cbsnews.com
2. 6th headline on cnn.com but the story is mostly about Chuck Grassley's reaction to the email release
3. 16th headline on washingtonpost.com

No headline on the front of foxnews.com that website is something else though, it is amazing.

I guess America is too preoccupied with El Chapo, the lottery, the Philadelphia cop, the NFL playoffs, the batshit crazy racist Maine Gov, and the affulenza teen mom to care about Hillary's emails from five years ago.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #897 on: January 08, 2016, 03:00:19 PM »
Do the hillary people really think this isn't a big deal? Seriously, you guys are okay with this?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #898 on: January 08, 2016, 03:03:15 PM »
Do the hillary people really think this isn't a big deal? Seriously, you guys are okay with this?

There aren't any "hillary people" posting in the pit, not a single one.

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #899 on: January 08, 2016, 03:05:20 PM »
if that doesn't matter, nobody should ever get in trouble for anything ever again.
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.