Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335367 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20500
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #800 on: November 16, 2015, 12:58:36 PM »
Why does Hillary want as few debates as possible, on nights with as few viewers as possible? And why is the DNC just giving her what she wants? http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2015/11/12/9699836/democratic-debate-schedule

1.  Because she wants to win and this limits the exposure of Bernie

2.  Because the DNC is comprised of tons of people that are Clinton associates or at least much more loyal to the Clintons than a democratic socialist from Vermont who caucuses with the Democrats.

Agreed. And 3, because the Democrats know that their surrogates in the MSM will more than supplement the lack of debates with fawning coverage.

I disagree about the extent to which your point is valid, but the structure is meant to limit any unscripted exposure to the candidates.  Due to the fact that there is really only two viable candidates and one that is so widely known that they don't really need exposure it just limits the potential for the stupid line Hillary had on 9/11 to be a story at all.  They are nowhere near as entertaining as the Republican debates for a number of reasons but that is only partly by design.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #801 on: November 16, 2015, 01:53:22 PM »
Legal marriage  :curse:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #802 on: November 30, 2015, 06:42:09 PM »
Ho hum. More Hillary emails released, more redacted as classified.

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/30/clinton-email-classification-rate-rises/

Meanwhile, the FBI's "investigation" into whether Hillary possessed classified information on a non-government sanctioned computer (facts which are by now indisputable) continues....
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #803 on: December 01, 2015, 12:10:06 PM »
Do FBI agents have accents and if so, will Hillary try and adapt/co-opt it (them) when politically expedient to do so?

Your Democratic front runner ladies and gentleman!


Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #804 on: December 03, 2015, 03:12:48 PM »
http://www.mediaite.com/online/nh-woman-to-hillary-you-say-rape-accusers-should-be-believed-what-about-your-husbands/

Quote
During a campaign event in New Hampshire today, Hillary Clinton was asked about the women who accused her husband of rape and sexual assault.
 
The woman pointed out how Clinton recently said all rape victims should be believed, and then asked, “Would you say that about Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, and/or Paula Jones?”

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Quote
Clinton responded by saying, “I would say that everybody should be believed at first until they are disbelieved based on evidence.”

 :lol: :lol: :lol: Hillary Clinton (a lawyer, btw): "You're guilty until proven innocent!"
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #805 on: December 03, 2015, 03:58:26 PM »
But what she said, awwww eff it nevermind I'm not going to waste my time.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #806 on: December 03, 2015, 04:01:48 PM »
But what she said, awwww eff it nevermind I'm not going to waste my time.

Lol, I did the same thing
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #807 on: December 03, 2015, 05:21:01 PM »
Same attitude applied to emails.   If you can't prove if it, I did nothing wrong even though I am more crooked than a boar's pecker.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #808 on: December 04, 2015, 09:11:09 AM »
Attention defenders/deflectors (Mir and 7) of the indefensible (hillary): take a breath. As she catapults towards the general election she will be publicly speaking A LOT more.  In direct correlation, her lies and hypocrisy will increase A LOT. Conserve your strength, you've got an Olympic sized plate of mental gymnastics to perform in the very near future.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #809 on: December 04, 2015, 09:35:02 AM »
She is seriously going to mop the floor with trump or Carson.  How scary that has to be for the GOP.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #810 on: December 04, 2015, 09:38:25 AM »
She is seriously going to mop the floor with trump or Carson.  How scary that has to be for the GOP.

yeah, it's a WTF situation. I do not like hillary at all. But the GOP cannot figure out how to get an electable president to the general and is going to force me to vote for her. Rubio or Bush and we can win this thing. But nope, we like the guy who speaks his mind. YOU'RE FIRED OBAMA!

Online john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7639
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #811 on: December 04, 2015, 10:56:19 AM »
I blame bush and rubio for not changing their platforms to please the majority of their own party. It's their problem, not the voters.

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #812 on: December 04, 2015, 10:58:23 AM »
I blame bush and rubio for not changing their platforms to please the majority of their own party. It's their problem, not the voters.

Well then the voters are gonna lose again. GOP voters need to get better at Game Theory.

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #813 on: December 04, 2015, 10:59:25 AM »
She is seriously going to mop the floor with trump or Carson.  How scary that has to be for the GOP.

But wait!  Cruz is above Carson now.  Not that it matters, Trump is 20pts above cruz.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #814 on: December 04, 2015, 11:01:05 AM »
I blame bush and rubio for not changing their platforms to please the majority of their own party. It's their problem, not the voters.

I think Rubio will still win the nomination in the end, plus he will have a whole lot more appeal with the moderates than he would have had if he took a pro-deportation stance.

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #815 on: December 04, 2015, 11:05:54 AM »
I blame bush and rubio for not changing their platforms to please the majority of their own party. It's their problem, not the voters.

I think Rubio will still win the nomination in the end, plus he will have a whole lot more appeal with the moderates than he would have had if he took a pro-deportation stance.

I wouldn't be sure. Rubio isn't leading in anyone of the first 4 state polls. Where does the momentum come from? New Hampshire is his best hope. And he isn't close there.  Super Tuesday? That's basically all the southern states that love Cruz. I don't understand the Rubio will win at some point argument. People have been saying that for months and he still isn't winning.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20500
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #816 on: December 04, 2015, 11:10:34 AM »
The early states don't matter too much because Florida, New York, Ohio, Texas, California have all the delegates and I think are all winner-take-all.

So Rubio probably wins this thing.

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #817 on: December 04, 2015, 11:13:41 AM »
The early states don't matter too much because Florida, New York, Ohio, Texas, California have all the delegates and I think are all winner-take-all.

So Rubio probably wins this thing.

He isn't winning Texas, Cruz is. And I disagree no nominee has ever lost the first 4 primaries and come back to win the nomination. Why is Rubio gonna be differen?

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #818 on: December 04, 2015, 11:27:36 AM »
You all are severely mentally handicapped if you think the Republican party is going to give the nomination to trump. Like that has zero chance of happening in real life.

You are also severely underestimating trumps cache is you think an incompetent sociopath like hillary clinton will mop the floor with him. He has polled ahead of her at times, for God's sake.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #819 on: December 04, 2015, 11:28:17 AM »
 Seems like a proper time to repost this.

Attention defenders/deflectors (Mir and 7) of the indefensible (hillary): take a breath. As she catapults towards the general election she will be publicly speaking A LOT more.  In direct correlation, her lies and hypocrisy will increase A LOT. Conserve your strength, you've got an Olympic sized plate of mental gymnastics to perform in the very near future.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #820 on: December 04, 2015, 11:34:59 AM »
Quote
Donald Trump is once again alone at the top of the Republican field, according to the latest CNN/ORC Poll, with 36% of registered Republicans and Republican-leaning independents behind him, while his nearest competitor trails by 20 points.

Three candidates cluster behind Trump in the mid-teens, including Texas Sen. Ted Cruz at 16%, former neurosurgeon Ben Carson at 14% and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio at 12%.

Trump is earning 3x Rubio's points.  Right now Curz and Carson could drop out, both successfully hand all of their followers over to Rubio, and Rubio would still be barely winning. 

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #821 on: December 04, 2015, 12:20:16 PM »
Hilz and Bernie are now beating all the pubs and my boy seems to be getting traction despite the efforts of the dnc, sorry bout it

http://observer.com/2015/12/shock-poll-bernie-sanders-is-the-most-electable-candidate-in-either-party/

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #822 on: December 04, 2015, 12:38:22 PM »
 :emawkid: (but with bsands colors)
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #823 on: December 04, 2015, 12:43:02 PM »
In fantasy land, where bern and trump could actually get their repective party's nomination, trump would humiliate a bumbling tin-foil hat weirdo like bern.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #824 on: December 04, 2015, 12:53:07 PM »
Oh, okay. Thank you for providing us with your ever enlightening and always surprising viewpoint. You are not at all a one trick pony and always keep us on the edge of our seats.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2015, 02:47:37 PM by MakeItRain »