Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335244 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #775 on: November 09, 2015, 11:58:19 PM »
It's been three days how's that Washington Free Beacon report going? :lol:

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #776 on: November 10, 2015, 12:17:38 AM »
Latest polling from Minnesota. http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=c35be9e1-00ac-46e1-ae46-2dd58f805665&c=72

Quote
Today, among MN registered voters, it's:

* Ben Carson 50%, Clinton 41%. GOP +9.
* Marco Rubio 47%, Clinton 41% .GOP +6.
* Carly Fiorina 45%, Clinton 41%.GOP +4
* Donald Trump 45%, Clinton 42%. GOP +3.
* Jeb Bush 44%, Clinton 43% --- within the survey's theoretical margin of sampling error, 'too-close-to-call.'
* Clinton 46%, Ted Cruz 41%, Clinton's best shot today. Dem +5.
Here is the disconnect:

Democratic (DFL Party) Governor Mark Dayton, Democratic (DFL Party) US Senator Al Franken and Democratic (DFL Party) US Senator Amy Klobuchar all today have unusually high Net Job Favorability ratings --- Plus 14 for Dayton; Plus 18 for Franken; Plus 32 for Klobuchar. But: Democratic President Barack Obama is under water, at Minus 19, a headwind for Hillary Clinton that may make Minnesota one of the country's most interesting states to watch in 2016. SurveyUSA has measured President Obama's job approval 15 times for KSTP-TV since Obama first took office. Minus 19 is his worst Net Favorability Rating to date.

She is a horrendous candidate with negatives over 50%.

Serious question, you don't really think any of these republicans will beat Hillary in Minnesota do you? Here's a little tidbit for you, since civil rights legislation changed the two parties, no state has voted democrat in presidential elections more than Minnesota; not California, not Massachusetts, but Minnesota. Since 1932 Minnesota has only been won by the republican nominee 3 times, the last one being Richard Nixon in 1972 in the most lopsided election in American history.

Minnesota politics are fascinating for people interested in such things.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #777 on: November 10, 2015, 01:21:13 AM »
Ya know, what a fantastic country.  You can be a sociopathic, co-opting perpetual liar, who actually glams on a fake Southern African American dialect when speaking to African Americans.  Responsible for the unilateral overthrow of governments, the death of US Ambassadors and the primary catalyst to the largest humanitarian and refugee crisis since WWII...and still run for president and be the Democratic front runner.

What a country!!

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #778 on: November 10, 2015, 07:00:24 AM »
 :ROFL:
Latest polling from Minnesota. http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=c35be9e1-00ac-46e1-ae46-2dd58f805665&c=72

Quote
Today, among MN registered voters, it's:

* Ben Carson 50%, Clinton 41%. GOP +9.
* Marco Rubio 47%, Clinton 41% .GOP +6.
* Carly Fiorina 45%, Clinton 41%.GOP +4
* Donald Trump 45%, Clinton 42%. GOP +3.
* Jeb Bush 44%, Clinton 43% --- within the survey's theoretical margin of sampling error, 'too-close-to-call.'
* Clinton 46%, Ted Cruz 41%, Clinton's best shot today. Dem +5.
Here is the disconnect:

Democratic (DFL Party) Governor Mark Dayton, Democratic (DFL Party) US Senator Al Franken and Democratic (DFL Party) US Senator Amy Klobuchar all today have unusually high Net Job Favorability ratings --- Plus 14 for Dayton; Plus 18 for Franken; Plus 32 for Klobuchar. But: Democratic President Barack Obama is under water, at Minus 19, a headwind for Hillary Clinton that may make Minnesota one of the country's most interesting states to watch in 2016. SurveyUSA has measured President Obama's job approval 15 times for KSTP-TV since Obama first took office. Minus 19 is his worst Net Favorability Rating to date.

She is a horrendous candidate with negatives over 50%.

Serious question, you don't really think any of these republicans will beat Hillary in Minnesota do you? Here's a little tidbit for you, since civil rights legislation changed the two parties, no state has voted democrat in presidential elections more than Minnesota; not California, not Massachusetts, but Minnesota. Since 1932 Minnesota has only been won by the republican nominee 3 times, the last one being Richard Nixon in 1972 in the most lopsided election in American history.

Minnesota politics are fascinating for people interested in such things.

You should stick to race rants and leave political prognostication to others. You think I don't know Minnesroa is deep blue? That's what makes this polling so amazing. Other Den politicians are polling just fine in MN, but Hillary is losing to a number of candidates. Does she ultimately still have the edge in MN on Election Day? Of course. But this poll indicates what a truly terrible candidate she is.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #779 on: November 10, 2015, 07:05:10 AM »
So obsessed  :lol:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #780 on: November 10, 2015, 09:20:24 AM »
That poll should scare the crap out of camp libtard.  :horrorsurprise:

LOL at civil rights legislation changing the parties. Where were you indoctrinated???
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #781 on: November 10, 2015, 12:07:41 PM »
MG want to do away with charter schools, stupid.  FSD can a person elected President pardon themselves and Bill the Thrill?

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #782 on: November 10, 2015, 12:11:32 PM »
Why should private schools get government money?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #783 on: November 10, 2015, 12:22:39 PM »
Come on now, quit deflecting from the fact that this psycho/sociopath pathological liar is the Dem front runner.

The best a post Obama Democratic party can do is . . . Hillary Clinton  :lol:

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #784 on: November 10, 2015, 12:24:11 PM »
What's that say about republicans after they lose to her  :sdeek:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #785 on: November 10, 2015, 12:28:33 PM »
What's that say about republicans after they lose to her  :sdeek:

Pretty sad lib, pretty sad.   But Hillary clearly says that, unlike what is espoused by the typical lib.   The quest for maintenance of power shall be achieved at all costs.  Even if it means electing a sociopath.



Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #786 on: November 10, 2015, 12:30:42 PM »
Who's your candidate dax?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #787 on: November 10, 2015, 12:41:54 PM »
Who's your candidate dax?

I kind of like Jeb, I think Rubio is interesting.

Certainly not Trump, Carson or any of the others on that side.

Would be nice if the Dems put up a real Center Left candidate and not a sociopath or socialist whack-a-doodle.






Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36686
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #788 on: November 10, 2015, 12:42:24 PM »
Who's your candidate dax?

I kind of like Jeb, I think Rubio is interesting.

Certainly not Trump, Carson or any of the others on that side.

Would be nice if the Dems put up a real Center Left candidate and not a sociopath or socialist whack-a-doodle.

That would be nice

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #789 on: November 10, 2015, 12:43:46 PM »
Hill Dawgs is pretty damn center left
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #790 on: November 10, 2015, 12:45:44 PM »
Hill Dawgs is pretty damn center left

That's what her husband ended up being in order to survive.   She'll push the envelope left as far as she can, while likely putting the neo-cons to shame on the global front, just like Obama has in so many ways.   

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #791 on: November 10, 2015, 01:11:05 PM »
Hill Dawgs is pretty damn center left

yes, she is definitely the more moderate of the two dem options. bush and rubio are the most moderate of the gop options.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #792 on: November 12, 2015, 02:53:30 PM »
Why does Hillary want as few debates as possible, on nights with as few viewers as possible? And why is the DNC just giving her what she wants? http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2015/11/12/9699836/democratic-debate-schedule
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #793 on: November 12, 2015, 03:25:52 PM »
Why does Hillary want as few debates as possible, on nights with as few viewers as possible? And why is the DNC just giving her what she wants? http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2015/11/12/9699836/democratic-debate-schedule

Unfortunately the DNC has trampled all over the other candidates and their supporters demanding more debates.   It would also surprise me if any future Dem debates are 50% as substantive as the Republican debate was the other night.   They'll be lots of talk of "free" and how this country is in terrible shape in the closing remarks.   But that's about it.


Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20499
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #795 on: November 16, 2015, 12:49:37 PM »
Why does Hillary want as few debates as possible, on nights with as few viewers as possible? And why is the DNC just giving her what she wants? http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2015/11/12/9699836/democratic-debate-schedule

1.  Because she wants to win and this limits the exposure of Bernie

2.  Because the DNC is comprised of tons of people that are Clinton associates or at least much more loyal to the Clintons than a democratic socialist from Vermont who caucuses with the Democrats.


Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #797 on: November 16, 2015, 12:53:39 PM »
Why does Hillary want as few debates as possible, on nights with as few viewers as possible? And why is the DNC just giving her what she wants? http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2015/11/12/9699836/democratic-debate-schedule

1.  Because she wants to win and this limits the exposure of Bernie

2.  Because the DNC is comprised of tons of people that are Clinton associates or at least much more loyal to the Clintons than a democratic socialist from Vermont who caucuses with the Democrats.

Agreed. And 3, because the Democrats know that their surrogates in the MSM will more than supplement the lack of debates with fawning coverage.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #798 on: November 16, 2015, 12:54:15 PM »
Media  :curse:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.