Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)

[star seed 7]

BillClintonIsInnocent

[renocat]

Hillary screamed at Obama to remove his copulation dogs from hunching her leg.  This president ain't stupid.  He is not going to be flushed down clinton crapper.  FBI has said they can retrieve the emails MG xeleted.   Must be damning things on them.

[renocat]

MG Nixon has been lying to us about Huma the Handmaid Hack.  Hil-Liary told NBC Andrea Mitchell that she had done nothing directly with giving Humus a special position that allowed her to work at State and for a political consulting company at the same time.  NY Times reported MG signed the order for Hooma to have this special position.  It is  being rumored that. Hielillary is suffering from brain farts, and fogets things like she is a crook.

[star seed 7]

i wonder what hielillary's brain farts smell like

[sonofdaxjones]

Debbie DNC is still lock tight air cover for Hillary.

Like I said, any party that works so hard to protect a criminal doesn't deserve the White House.   No wonder so many ProgLibs are pining for the old white guy to jump into the race.

[star seed 7]

We already have a great old white guy in the race #feelthebern

[sonofdaxjones]

I meant another one.  Damn you're so prickly when your party acts like asshats. 

[star seed 7]

Another case of dax confusing  and 

Does slobber do this too?

[sonofdaxjones]

You're unbelievably weird.

[star seed 7]

 

[wetwillie]

Debbie DNC is still lock tight air cover for Hillary.

Like I said, any party that works so hard to protect a criminal doesn't deserve the White House.   No wonder so many ProgLibs are pining for the old white guy to jump into the race.

Take it back.  Take back that mean thing you said about joe.

[renocat]

MSN reports Valerie Jarrett, Obama's senior adviser that the White House gave MG Hillary guidance forbidding her from using private email.  JUST LET THAT SOAK IN.  Queen MG has stated for months past Secretary of States used private emails.  We all know she used private email not the government's.  Old Hide decided to do this herself in total disregard of the Presidential orders.  Audacity deluxe.  Apply this mindset to the Presidency and she will think it is okay to do anything she damn pleases.

[star seed 7]

Disobeying Obama will score her some major points on the right

[renocat]

MG wants gun manufacturers, distributers, and sellers to be liable for damages caused by a gun connected to them.    She is is a commie queen.

[OK_Cat]

The only thing Hillary is illegally doing is living inside the heads of the resident pubs without paying rent

[star seed 7]

MG wants gun manufacturers, distributers, and sellers to be liable for damages caused by a gun connected to them.    She is is a commie queen.

How's that communist?

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

The information below was reported over a month ago, but I don't think it has received the attention it deserves. Chuck Todd did not deign to ask Hillary about it during his recent interview. But it sure seems to be a smoking gun that Hillary sent and received classified information on her home server, and therefore committed a felony.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/423371/hillary-clinton-emails-tony-blair-classified-information

Tony Blair knew about Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail account before the American people did — and his off-the-grid e-mail exchanges with Clinton are another sledgehammer to the already crumbling edifice of excuses offered in defense of her homebrew server.

Among the thousands of Clinton e-mails released by the State Department last night were direct exchanges with foreign dignitaries such as former prime minister (and then special envoy for the Middle East Quartet) Blair and internal exchanges between State Department officials about those conversations. The conversations cover a wide range of world hot spots, including the Middle East, Afghanistan and Iran, Sudan, and Haiti. Many of them — nearly 200 in total to date [it's actually norht of 400 now!] — have now been classified by the State Department as “foreign government information” and redacted or withheld from release. The very nature of the communications in those e-mails established that they contained classified information from their inception. Mrs. Clinton’s defense that she did not know of the existence of such information on her server at the time is laughable.

...

With some urgency, Hillary Clinton asked Tony Blair to cancel a speech scheduled in Aspen, Colo., to “go to Israel as part of our full court press on keeping the Middle East negotiations going.” Blair obliged, and Clinton e-mailed the organizers of the Aspen conference to explain the cancelation. She then e-mailed Blair that his schedule was now clear: “Tony — Message Delivered. . . . I’m copying Jake Sullivan because I’ve asked him to arrange a call w you once you land so you can be fully briefed before seeing BN [Netanyahu]. We are on a fast moving train changing every hour but determined to reach our destination.”

Later that day, Blair responded: “Hi Hillary. Just spent 3 hours with BB [Netanyahu]. Ready to speak when convenient but should do it on a secure line.” There is no indication whether that secure conversation took place, but the message certainly indicates that Blair at least understood the sensitivity of the subject matter.

Blair e-mailed Clinton again the next day, copying Sullivan, Clinton’s aide, apparently on a private e-mail account of his own. The entirety of that e-mail has been redacted from public disclosure as part of the FOIA release. Why? Because it has now been acknowledged as classified information and formally marked “Confidential” by State Department reviewers. The markings that accompany the redactions (which took place just this week as part of the release) explain that the redacted portion is classified under parts 1.4(B) and 1.4(D) of President Obama’s Executive Order 13526. Thus, it falls within the categories of information classified as “foreign government information” — 1.4(B) — and information relating to “foreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources” — 1.4(D).

If Hillary sent and received classified information on her home server - and it appears to be indisputable that she did - that's a felony under Title 18, Section 1924 subject to a fine and possible imprisonment.

Hillary has offered the excuse that none of the information was "marked" as classified at the time she sent it, but this excuse fails for two reasons: (1) whether information is classified depends upon the information, not the marking, and (2) the information couldn't have been marked as classified because Hillary hid it on her private server!!

So is there really any serious debate anymore about whether Hillary committed a felony? Please explain.

[michigancat]

MG wants gun manufacturers, distributers, and sellers to be liable for damages caused by a gun connected to them.    She is is a commie queen.

How's that communist?

gun manufacturers are like the only things not liable for damage or injury caused by their product. I mean a chair tips and over someone gets hurt the chair factory can be in some deep crap.

[Rage Against the McKee]

MG wants gun manufacturers, distributers, and sellers to be liable for damages caused by a gun connected to them.    She is is a commie queen.

How's that communist?

gun manufacturers are like the only things not liable for damage or injury caused by their product. I mean a chair tips and over someone gets hurt the chair factory can be in some deep crap.

Chairs aren't designed to tip over, though.

[michigancat]

MG wants gun manufacturers, distributers, and sellers to be liable for damages caused by a gun connected to them.    She is is a commie queen.

How's that communist?

gun manufacturers are like the only things not liable for damage or injury caused by their product. I mean a chair tips and over someone gets hurt the chair factory can be in some deep crap.

Chairs aren't designed to tip over, though.

yeah, but there are laws in place regulating their safety. Laws regulating safety mechanisms on guns are just absurd compared to like, every other product.

[puniraptor]

a gun's intended purpose is to kill. i find it hard to imagine holding the company responsible just because it killed the wrong thing at the wrong time.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

a gun's intended purpose is to kill. i find it hard to imagine holding the company responsible just because it killed the wrong thing at the wrong time.

Correct. Gun manufacturers can and are held liable for product defects. Somebody going a shooting spree with a gun is a defect in the shooter - not the gun. You wouldn't expect a victim of a drunk driver to sue the car manufacturer.

It's worth debating whether a person who purchases a gun should be held liable for the way that gun is used by others, unless it is reported as stolen to the police.

But shouldn't this be in the gun control thread?

I'm still waiting for anyone to explain how Hillary didn't commit a felony in e-mailing communications that have now been redacted as classified.

[Rage Against the McKee]

a gun's intended purpose is to kill. i find it hard to imagine holding the company responsible just because it killed the wrong thing at the wrong time.

Correct. Gun manufacturers can and are held liable for product defects. Somebody going a shooting spree with a gun is a defect in the shooter - not the gun. You wouldn't expect a victim of a drunk driver to sue the car manufacturer.

It's worth debating whether a person who purchases a gun should be held liable for the way that gun is used by others, unless it is reported as stolen to the police.

But shouldn't this be in the gun control thread?

I'm still waiting for anyone to explain how Hillary didn't commit a felony in e-mailing communications that have now been redacted as classified.

It sounds to me like she probably did.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Hillary is really drilling on the Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) populist agenda. She will have no problem culling 1/3 of the vote.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

I'm still waiting for anyone to explain how Hillary didn't commit a felony in e-mailing communications that have now been redacted as classified.

It sounds to me like she probably did.

Then how is it that she is still at or near the top in most polls?

Do Democrats not care that their preferred candidate engaged in felony possession of classified information on a less-secure home server in order to hide her correspondence from FOIA requests - it's TIME for a woman?

Or is the field so desperately thin that they're just supporting her over an avowed socialist?

Or are many Democrats simply not aware that Clinton likely committed a felony because it hasn't gotten enough media coverage (the MSM actually is covering it quite a bit, though they haven't really focused on this smoking gun)?

These are all serious questions, btw. I'm genuinely curious about the liberal mindset on this. Conservative voters would have ousted any of their candidates a long time ago over something like this, but they've got many more candidates to choose from.

It's really pretty remarkable. The Dems' current choices are (1) a septuagenarian socialist, (2) a sexagenarian socialist-lite who engaged in felony possession of classified material on a home server to hide her correspondence, (3) Martin O'Malley.

O'Malley is by far the most palatable choice, and he's barely registering in the polls!