Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335551 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #650 on: August 15, 2015, 04:19:30 PM »
If all of this means that I end up having to vote for Bernie Sanders, I'm going to be pissed.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #651 on: August 15, 2015, 04:26:00 PM »
I would vote Bernie in the primary.   I think his govt/money issue needs a bright light for an extended period of time. 

I mean, so far none of them are worth a vote.  I would like it if we could have a few candidates pick up a few issues that aren't abortion, and actually maybe do something. 

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk


Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #652 on: August 15, 2015, 04:52:42 PM »
it is amazing that the democrats are hell bent on going into this election without a single appealing candidate.  they're approaching this thing like it's a handicap race.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85346
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #653 on: August 15, 2015, 05:09:43 PM »

it is amazing that the democrats are hell bent on going into this election without a single appealing candidate.  they're approaching this thing like it's a handicap race.

Yes, the approach from both sides is rough ridin' ridiculous.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #654 on: August 15, 2015, 05:35:40 PM »
I'm placing all my hope in kasich
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #655 on: August 15, 2015, 05:36:25 PM »
Though b sand is my boy and I would love if he could win
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #656 on: August 15, 2015, 10:51:23 PM »
MG was at the Iowa State Fair today, and no one could get near her. Smile and wave at the peons and dumb hog farmers. She yucked it up and said her email problems are caused by a right wing conspiracy, right out of the Clinton playbook.  What's next? I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT SERVER.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #657 on: August 17, 2015, 06:04:41 PM »
The MG belly flop dive inot the cesspool of oblivion continues,  300 emails being scrutinized as top secret.  Some expect emails backed up to another server.   The lying old rip, lies again to us stupid peons.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #658 on: August 18, 2015, 10:09:01 AM »
The dung beetles are swarming at Hillary's feet.  Today it is reported her lawyer who had copies of her emails on thumb drives did not have the security clearance to have this information.  Also MG claims none of the emails were tagged confidential or top secret when she got them, but state department officials said they had to have been so marked.  Who took off the labeling if she ain't lying?

Online Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14961
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #659 on: August 18, 2015, 10:10:23 AM »
Maybe I missed it but what does the acronym MG stand for?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #660 on: August 18, 2015, 10:11:24 AM »
She is done.  The question now is who will the Dems put up in her place and how will they explain that person's absence up until now?  I really hope it isn't Biden.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #661 on: August 18, 2015, 10:46:37 AM »
Maybe I missed it but what does the acronym MG stand for?

mean grandma

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #662 on: August 18, 2015, 11:46:21 AM »
Did get a chance to listen to always humourous conservative talk radio this morning for a bit.   I don't know who the guy was, there's like 11eventybillion of them now.    But multiple Hillary defenders (legit or planted callers??) phoned into say that the senders of the reportedly classified emails are the one's responsible for ensuring security, not the receiver.    That's fine, but apparently they're not real concerned that server(s) were in a bathroom closet and by all accounts not all that secure both physically and on the network.   Not to mention those pesky Gov't regs regarding conducting gov't business in an IT environment etc. etc.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #663 on: August 18, 2015, 11:52:42 AM »
Did get a chance to listen to always humourous conservative talk radio this morning for a bit.   I don't know who the guy was, there's like 11eventybillion of them now.    But multiple Hillary defenders (legit or planted callers??) phoned into say that the senders of the reportedly classified emails are the one's responsible for ensuring security, not the receiver.    That's fine, but apparently they're not real concerned that server(s) were in a bathroom closet and by all accounts not all that secure both physically and on the network.   Not to mention those pesky Gov't regs regarding conducting gov't business in an IT environment etc. etc.

I would also assume that there would be plenty of emails she generated that would need to be deemed classified where the responsibility would be hers.  Also, if you are the Sec of State, receive an email that isn't classified, notice it should be classified, I would think that your job should be to fix that issue, rather than perpetuate it.  Is control of info not part of the gig?

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #664 on: August 18, 2015, 11:59:08 AM »
Dax is just constantly assaulted with MG defenders, which is weird because they are extremely rare in my life
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #665 on: August 18, 2015, 12:05:04 PM »
democrats are lucking into dodging a bullet if clinton is going to get hounded out of the race.  amazingly, they hadn't noticed that she was unelectable, with or without email scandals.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #666 on: August 18, 2015, 12:06:19 PM »
democrats are lucking into dodging a bullet if clinton is going to get hounded out of the race.  amazingly, they hadn't noticed that she was unelectable, with or without email scandals.

They noticed in 2008
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14961
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #667 on: August 18, 2015, 12:08:15 PM »
I'm hoping this email thing causes her to withdraw.  Sad news is there doesn't appear to be any other viable candidates. Although there is nothing in the world I want to see more than a Biden v Trump debate.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #668 on: August 18, 2015, 12:09:48 PM »
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #669 on: August 18, 2015, 12:13:07 PM »
Hi Joe, can I call you LOOOOOSAH?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #670 on: August 18, 2015, 12:23:22 PM »
I'm hoping this email thing causes her to withdraw.  Sad news is there doesn't appear to be any other viable candidates. Although there is nothing in the world I want to see more than a Biden v Trump debate.

It would be the ultimate in political entertainment.  It would suck for basically every other reason.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #671 on: August 18, 2015, 12:29:43 PM »
lib must live in a world full of mirrors because she seems to think every post is directed at her.

Strange, yet sad.


Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #672 on: August 18, 2015, 12:31:26 PM »
We were both just relaying some of our personal experiences dax. Compare/contrast, things of that nature
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #673 on: August 18, 2015, 01:09:10 PM »
Yeah, no way Hillary survives an August email scandal. She's done.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #674 on: August 18, 2015, 01:10:07 PM »
So you do realize that there's still a lot of Hillary supporters out there, and you've got some Dem, no, many Dem talking heads saying this is "all gonna blow over and isn't a big deal".  Right?