Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335155 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21447
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #575 on: June 08, 2015, 04:06:07 PM »
Pennsylvania?

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20498
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #576 on: June 09, 2015, 09:59:31 AM »
Interesting Re: voting restrictions  (I don't necessarily think the conclusion is logical)

http://www.vox.com/2015/6/8/8740897/informed-voters-may-not-be-better-voters

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #577 on: June 13, 2015, 04:45:14 PM »
The Old Razzle Dazzle Mean Boss Cow, MG Clinton took another try at announcing for President.  she said Republicans are living in yesterday, but she wants to be like FDR. He has been dead for t0 plus years and young voters don't have a clue who he is.  She sounds like Obama in drag

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #578 on: June 13, 2015, 06:32:57 PM »
So I guess she's already relaunching her campaign less than a month after she "launched" it with a youtube video - and the media appears to mostly be reporting it with a straight face. She wants to build an FDR/Obama coalition, whatever that means. I'm just gonna guess that means a lot of "free" stuff.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #579 on: June 14, 2015, 08:56:10 AM »
She's not going to be able to launch over the fact that she sucks
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64043
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #580 on: June 14, 2015, 09:35:44 AM »
She's not going to be able to launch over the fact that she sucks

This is a very good point
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #581 on: June 14, 2015, 01:08:25 PM »
The potential to be :runaway: THE FIRST :runaway: will cover a lot of flaws, corruption, and just general repulsivity. There are tens of millions of people who will vote for her for that reason alone - and no, not all of them were going to vote Dem anyway.
« Last Edit: June 14, 2015, 01:12:12 PM by K-S-U-Wildcats! »
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #582 on: June 14, 2015, 01:12:06 PM »
I think a lot women will vote against her for not leaving her two-timing serial rapist husband.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64043
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #583 on: June 14, 2015, 01:54:23 PM »
i wonder if anyone will vote against her because she's a woman.

naw, no one voted against obama cause he was black.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #584 on: June 14, 2015, 03:41:42 PM »
i wonder if anyone will vote against her because she's a woman.

naw, no one voted against obama cause he was black.
[/quote)
WE ARE SCREEEEEEEWED now you can be something if you think you are. Bill the Thrill could feel your pain and other things too. So Ms. MG Clinton will know what it is like to be black, poor, hispanic, nice, gay, and a fighter for freedom cause thought she was.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #585 on: June 15, 2015, 12:16:01 AM »
well she did have that affair w/ Yoko

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #586 on: June 15, 2015, 07:42:19 AM »
I see Hillary is still trying to pull off the southern preacher / Obama speaking cadence, and it's still just as cringeworthy. I'm guessing she's got some sort of public speaking coach who tells her this will make her sound less shrill.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/06/14/marco_rubio_ad_slams_clintons_yesterday_reference_yesterday_is_over.html
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline massofcatfan

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 782
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #587 on: June 15, 2015, 08:57:34 AM »
I want to wake up in a city that never sleeps, etc.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #588 on: June 15, 2015, 09:14:12 AM »
Cringe worthy is right.  yeeesh.

Offline ShellShock

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 980
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #589 on: June 15, 2015, 09:43:09 AM »
After Benghazi and the coverup, how is she even being remotely being considered for a presidential nomination?

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #590 on: June 15, 2015, 09:49:01 AM »
After Benghazi and the coverup, how is she even being remotely being considered for a presidential nomination?

The democratic party is just a pile of crap for the most part.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #591 on: June 15, 2015, 09:49:34 AM »
After Benghazi and the coverup, how is she even being remotely being considered for a presidential nomination?
Oh, you mean the coverup that the 'Pub investigation determined there was no coverup?  That coverup?
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #592 on: June 15, 2015, 09:50:36 AM »
i wonder if anyone will vote against her because she's a woman.

naw, no one voted against obama cause he was black.

"...one demographically symbolic president is enough"

/not a party of bigots
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #593 on: June 15, 2015, 09:51:25 AM »
After Benghazi and the coverup, how is she even being remotely being considered for a presidential nomination?
Oh, you mean the coverup that the 'Pub investigation determined there was no coverup?  That coverup?

So the attack really was all about that Youtube video?

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #594 on: June 15, 2015, 09:54:15 AM »
After Benghazi and the coverup, how is she even being remotely being considered for a presidential nomination?
Oh, you mean the coverup that the 'Pub investigation determined there was no coverup?  That coverup?

So the attack really was all about that Youtube video?
Ummm 404 coverup
Being wrong happens, get over it and move on.  Sorry that the party of "no" couldn't even gin up enough proof to prove the claim of a coverup.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #595 on: June 15, 2015, 09:55:17 AM »
It is pretty sad that the party knew she was going to be running and still couldn't find anyone better to shove in front.  It's like they want the Pubs to take it. 

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #596 on: June 15, 2015, 09:57:26 AM »
It is pretty sad that the party knew she was going to be running and still couldn't find anyone better to shove in front.  It's like they want the Pubs to take it.

There is still some hope that O'Malley does well in his campaign and debates. The lack of other candidates is going to give him a very big spotlight for an extended period of time.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #597 on: June 15, 2015, 10:03:13 AM »
i wonder if anyone will vote against her because she's a woman.

naw, no one voted against obama cause he was black.

"...one demographically symbolic president is enough"

/not a party of bigots

Still obsessing over that comment huh? I don't think it's racist or, frankly, inaccurate to point that being the first black president will probably be Obama's biggest success.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #598 on: June 15, 2015, 10:03:16 AM »
It is pretty sad that the party knew she was going to be running and still couldn't find anyone better to shove in front.  It's like they want the Pubs to take it.

There is still some hope that O'Malley does well in his campaign and debates. The lack of other candidates is going to give him a very big spotlight for an extended period of time.
Its pretty bad that the Dems are only fielding her.  Once again people will be looking for the lesser of two evils instead of voting for a candidate. 
Also it seems like the Dems are just sitting back for the 'Pubs to self destruct again. Eventually the 'Pubs will learn and will destroy the recordings (47% lol) or they will be smart enough to not make those comments and then the Dems will be in trouble.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline ShellShock

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 980
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #599 on: June 15, 2015, 10:05:21 AM »
After Benghazi and the coverup, how is she even being remotely being considered for a presidential nomination?
Oh, you mean the coverup that the 'Pub investigation determined there was no coverup?  That coverup?

I mean the coverup with destroying evidence...twice