Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335324 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #375 on: April 27, 2015, 08:45:27 AM »
Clintons for Cash.  They give you a favor, then you pay them $250,000 to give a speech.  They are just helping a friend - no bribes.   When caught - hey we have stupid accountants who make mistakes.  The media seems to ignorant to know how to add.  MS MG and Bill the Thrill live on. 

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #376 on: April 27, 2015, 12:09:16 PM »
What does MG stand for?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6063
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #377 on: April 27, 2015, 12:34:54 PM »
So if I am following this correctly.

A politician accepted money and there is some fear that said money is feared to have influenced said politician.

 :confused:

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #378 on: April 27, 2015, 12:57:47 PM »
So if I am following this correctly.

A politician accepted money and there is some fear that said money is feared to have influenced said politician.

 :confused:

That's an oversimplification. By a lot. The Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, donated $2.35 million to Clinton's "foundation" to influence the State Department (over which Clinton was SoS) to approve its purchase of Uranium One, which controls 20% of the United States' uranium reserves. Clinton, of course, never disclosed the donations. At the same time this deal was going down, Bill Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

It's all here: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=2

Still confused? There are really no words that can adquately describe the rank corruption of the Clinton Machine.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #379 on: April 27, 2015, 01:07:32 PM »
Sounds like some first amendment hating

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #380 on: April 27, 2015, 01:11:50 PM »

Can you really call yourself a feminist if you allow your husband to rape every woman within arms reach?

I wonder if the Clinton Foundation will donate to PACs that support hillary.  I really wonder if the democrats will allow her to finish off the party for b.o., or try and resurrect with someone else.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7639
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #381 on: April 27, 2015, 01:12:24 PM »
Hillary says it was just a mistake that they didn't report the Russian money; just sloppy accounting. As everyone knows, accountants, by nature, aren't detail oriented.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #382 on: April 27, 2015, 01:16:43 PM »
Hillary says it was just a mistake that they didn't report the Russian money; just sloppy accounting. As everyone knows, accountants, by nature, aren't detail oriented.

Reads: will be sure to cover it up better going forward. Now, who else is willing to pay for "preferred" government status?

 I bet they have a clinton foundation rewards program. A million points gets you a lucrative government contract, ten million gets you a business monopoly, and twenty million gets you a get out of jail free card for atrocities against women and homosexuals.

#thinkleft
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #383 on: April 27, 2015, 02:00:56 PM »
Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) link=topic=31932.msg1358545#msg1358545
I bet they have a clinton foundation rewards program. A million points gets you a lucrative government contract, ten million gets you a business monopoly, and twenty million gets you a get out of jail free card for atrocities against women and homosexuals.

#thinkleft

:lol: If they're not already doing this, they totally should.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #384 on: April 27, 2015, 03:45:34 PM »
But you know, I'm sure we'll get this all sorted out once Clinton produces all those e-mails from her tenure as SoS...


...that she kept on a home server and then irretrievably deleted. How convenient.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #385 on: April 27, 2015, 04:09:02 PM »


I'm guessing the funneling of money from the Foundation to HRC's campaign falls somewhere under "Other Expenses." The Foundation sure is doing an efficient job, though, right?
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #386 on: April 27, 2015, 04:22:24 PM »
Best circle jerk in months  :love:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21453
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #387 on: April 27, 2015, 04:31:57 PM »
Best circle jerk in months  :love:

It's more of a wonky-circle jerk

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #388 on: April 27, 2015, 05:38:43 PM »

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #389 on: April 27, 2015, 05:43:49 PM »
Can I use that too?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #390 on: April 27, 2015, 06:13:05 PM »

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #391 on: April 28, 2015, 12:44:41 PM »
Is a circle jerk more or less sophomoric than an itch-manhattan townie dick holding festival?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #392 on: April 28, 2015, 01:02:20 PM »
I love Hillary and super hope she wins because the conservative meltdown will be increds. Man. Can you imagine if "ProgLibs" becomes a thing?
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #393 on: April 28, 2015, 01:29:35 PM »
Nope. Hillary Clinton (D) is all that matters because it would make the butthurt worst :love:
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #394 on: April 28, 2015, 01:44:16 PM »
Yes, Jeb Bush is the POTUS we need.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #395 on: April 28, 2015, 01:45:15 PM »
Hillary vs Jeb in the general election are the campaigns we deserve.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #396 on: April 28, 2015, 01:54:14 PM »
I actually have hardcore ProgLib relatives who like Jeb.

Well, they probably aren't that hardcore.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #397 on: April 28, 2015, 01:59:48 PM »
I've never voted against someone I like. It's just so rare to get an opportunity.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7639
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #398 on: April 28, 2015, 02:03:27 PM »
Pretty sure Jeb is a ProgLib, just not a far left Proglib.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #399 on: April 28, 2015, 02:25:12 PM »
He's a ProgCon.