Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335210 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #200 on: March 04, 2015, 07:26:43 PM »
This makes me want to vote for her more. eff the police.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #201 on: March 04, 2015, 08:13:12 PM »
This makes me want to vote for her more. eff the police.

 :Wha:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Headinjun

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1226
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #202 on: March 04, 2015, 10:26:01 PM »
I wasn't going to vote for her either.  Too connected, and this stunt proves it.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #203 on: March 05, 2015, 11:43:02 PM »
Hilliary, getting the big flush, and the chain is being pulled by liberals.  Its funny watching the left media eat their own.   Like watching diseased chickens peck each other to death.  Can Bill the Thrill save her or will he get revenge fo years of celibacy?  Will Warm Em Up Al "babY" Gore run again?

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #204 on: March 10, 2015, 08:41:57 AM »
Just more lying lies from the wimp.

When first asked by CBS about when he learned of the Hillary private e-mails, Obama did his standard Sergeant Schultz routine - "durrrrr, I learned about it the same time you did in the news reports, honest!" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/07/obama-hillary-email_n_6824304.html

Then they realized how easy it would be to expose that lie once Hillary's e-mails were produced. The office of the wimp has now "revised" the answer. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/03/09/white-house-yes-president-obama-and-hillary-clinton-e-mailed-each-other/

But still, Obama like totally didn't know it was a private e-mail server, according to Josh not-so Earnest.. I mean, who could have guessed that clintonemail.com was not a government account? :dunno:
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #205 on: March 10, 2015, 10:32:46 AM »

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #206 on: March 10, 2015, 11:45:20 AM »
I just signed up [email protected] for like 50 porn websites

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #207 on: March 10, 2015, 12:33:24 PM »
I just signed up [email protected] for like 50 porn websites

No, you've got your Clintons mixed up. The address you should have used was [email protected].
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21336
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #208 on: March 10, 2015, 04:15:02 PM »
as an IT professional this stunt makes me cringe

i bet its the name thats the worst part, right? clintonemail.com? obviously its email. clintonmail.com would have been better. an elite would have chosen @clinton.com, but maybe that was taken by some small timey ISP

Online Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29146
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #209 on: March 10, 2015, 04:24:13 PM »
they block stuff from my @raegan.com account that gets through to whitehouse.gov just fine :frown:

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6268
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #210 on: March 10, 2015, 05:12:57 PM »
A lot of people making connections between this and Brownback/Romney when they were governor.

This is way worse.  Yes, it is bad when the chief executive of a state tries to do the people's business without any transparency or oversight and specifically in concert with outside interests.

It is worse when someone representing the US to the world, who serves at the pleasure of the President does the same.  Did Obama approve this?  Who knew when?  It is impossible to believe that the CIA didn't know/monitor, but how could anyone sign off on this is beyond me.  And if Clinton really brazenly did this without any permission it is maybe worse.  The diplomatic cables of the US should be one of the highest priorities for secrecy and running it through someone's personal website set up not because it is more secure, but to provide an end around for subpoena is truly awful.

Even though Bill is maybe the most likable person on the planet on a surface level, they are both really terrible people.

This makes me sad.

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6268
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #211 on: March 10, 2015, 05:14:27 PM »
I wasn't going to vote for her either.  Too connected, and this stunt proves it.

lol

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #212 on: March 10, 2015, 05:21:10 PM »
I already have Hillary fatigue.  Her pants suits look like the garb Chinese communist wear.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #213 on: March 10, 2015, 06:10:55 PM »
I already have Hillary fatigue.  Her pants suits look like the garb Chinese communist wear.

Oh wow, is this the new Facebook thing that's going to explode? Not 10 seconds after I read this I heard one of the am neocon radio hosts call it her chairman mao outfit
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #214 on: March 10, 2015, 10:18:55 PM »
Clinton calls on a "totally random" Turkish journalist at her presser today for the very first question, who promptly asks whether there would be such a fuss if she wasn't a woman.  :facepalm:

We've got 18 more long months of this... and a lot longer if she wins.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/03/10/first_question_to_hillary_would_this_be_happening_if_you_were_a_man.html
« Last Edit: March 11, 2015, 08:57:31 AM by K-S-U-Wildcats! »
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #215 on: March 10, 2015, 11:09:50 PM »
Hillary just gave the pubs 45 minutes worth of double-talking and outright lying soundbites in their campaign against her.
 
The bits and pieces I heard were really bad. Who is advising this lunatic? ??
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #216 on: March 11, 2015, 09:08:06 AM »
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51509
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #217 on: March 11, 2015, 09:16:14 AM »
Explaining this one away might be pretty tricky

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #218 on: March 11, 2015, 10:06:19 AM »
I hope Hillary and those 47 Senators all go to jail.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #219 on: March 11, 2015, 11:09:19 AM »
We need more badasses like Hillary in charge.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #220 on: March 11, 2015, 02:21:31 PM »
We need more badasses like Hillary in charge.

There's a reason why, despite attempts to redirect, Hillary may go down as one of the most nondescript, possibly even one of the most bumbling SOS's in modern U.S. history.

I know one and only one thing about any SOS ever: Hillary Clinton gave zero fucks about the email rules. That's all I need to know.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #221 on: March 11, 2015, 08:49:02 PM »
She mumped up Benghazi pretty hard. Total boss
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #222 on: March 12, 2015, 10:33:47 AM »
She mumped up Benghazi pretty hard. Total boss

Speaking of which... Hillary hasn't released a single e-mail from the day this photo was taken on board a plane headed for Libya.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/clinton-hasn-shared-emails-day-famous-photo-article-1.2146686



She was probably just doing some Pinterest or solitare.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #223 on: March 12, 2015, 06:14:49 PM »
Would you say that if she was a man?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016?
« Reply #224 on: March 12, 2015, 08:19:27 PM »
I have no doubt she could be mean ass cold tough.  She could make steers with her bare hands.  Wanting to be the first woman President is not a good reason to select her.  I Am still trying to figure out her latest outfits.  Is it a Moa moo moo or a space alien suit.