Author Topic: the big 12 may have sucked.  (Read 4328 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40577
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
the big 12 may have sucked.
« on: March 23, 2014, 01:41:29 PM »
be nice if isu or baylor could advance.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36834
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2014, 01:42:09 PM »
Hard to tell.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2014, 01:42:31 PM »
A bunch of pretty good teams. No great teams.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45003
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2014, 01:44:22 PM »
tournament performance is no indicator of conference strength

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2014, 01:44:29 PM »
ku sucked without embiid. isu sucks without niang. baylor sucks.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40577
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #5 on: March 23, 2014, 01:49:06 PM »
tournament performance is no indicator of conference strength

well, it's not a great indicator.  but it's a lot better than how the teams did playing 18 games against each other.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13596
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #6 on: March 23, 2014, 01:53:41 PM »
sys, i could have told you this a long time ago

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40577
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #7 on: March 23, 2014, 01:55:07 PM »
sys, i could have told you this a long time ago

i wouldn't have listened.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #8 on: March 23, 2014, 01:55:58 PM »
ku sucked without embiid. isu sucks without niang. baylor sucks.
Baylor does not suck.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13596
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #9 on: March 23, 2014, 01:56:09 PM »
sys, i could have told you this a long time ago

i wouldn't have listened.

yeah, well thats your mistake.  i may be controversial but i'm never wrong.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53975
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #10 on: March 23, 2014, 01:57:56 PM »
tournament performance is no indicator of conference strength

but it's a good indicator of coaching prowess?

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45003
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #11 on: March 23, 2014, 03:25:32 PM »
tournament performance is no indicator of conference strength

but it's a good indicator of coaching prowess?

To an extent, of course it does. Don't be so obtuse. Does your conference recruit for you, train your players, or determine what you run?

Offline ksufan44

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 90
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #12 on: March 23, 2014, 03:32:46 PM »
tournament performance is no indicator of conference strength

but it's a good indicator of coaching prowess?

Does this mean Coach K can't coach anymore because he's lost his first game 2 of the last 3 years to 14 and 15 seeds? Tourney is all about matchups, getting hot at the right time of the year, or riding some stud player like Kemba.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45003
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #13 on: March 23, 2014, 03:34:56 PM »
tournament performance is no indicator of conference strength

but it's a good indicator of coaching prowess?

Does this mean Coach K can't coach anymore because he's lost his first game 2 of the last 3 years to 14 and 15 seeds? Tourney is all about matchups, getting hot at the right time of the year, or riding some stud player like Kemba.

michigancat isn't saying that, he's taking a completely different conversation we were having about oscar last night and is intentionally misapplying it here

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53975
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #14 on: March 23, 2014, 04:18:45 PM »
tournament performance is no indicator of conference strength

but it's a good indicator of coaching prowess?

To an extent, of course it does. Don't be so obtuse. Does your conference recruit for you, train your players, or determine what you run?

I just don't think you can have it both ways. It's a poor indicator for both conference strength and coaching ability.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40577
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #15 on: March 23, 2014, 04:36:27 PM »
it's a much better indicator of conference strength.

big 12 teams will play a minimum of 11 tournament games against quality competition.  that's probably about 1/2 to 1/4 as many games against tournament-level teams as were played in the non-conference season.  so, it's not insubstantial.

"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13596
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #16 on: March 23, 2014, 04:38:14 PM »
tournament performance is no indicator of conference strength

but it's a good indicator of coaching prowess?

To an extent, of course it does. Don't be so obtuse. Does your conference recruit for you, train your players, or determine what you run?

I just don't think you can have it both ways. It's a poor indicator for both conference strength and coaching ability.

yeah, or its a good indicator for both.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45003
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #17 on: March 23, 2014, 04:42:54 PM »
tournament performance is no indicator of conference strength

but it's a good indicator of coaching prowess?

To an extent, of course it does. Don't be so obtuse. Does your conference recruit for you, train your players, or determine what you run?

I just don't think you can have it both ways. It's a poor indicator for both conference strength and coaching ability.

If you are equating this to our conversation you shouldn't, because I never said that oscar is a bad coach because his recent tournament record is terrible. As a matter of fact I don't think I have ever made a post that references oscar's coaching ability as bad. Good coaches get fired a lot.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53975
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #18 on: March 23, 2014, 04:55:25 PM »
tournament performance is no indicator of conference strength

but it's a good indicator of coaching prowess?

To an extent, of course it does. Don't be so obtuse. Does your conference recruit for you, train your players, or determine what you run?

I just don't think you can have it both ways. It's a poor indicator for both conference strength and coaching ability.

If you are equating this to our conversation you shouldn't, because I never said that oscar is a bad coach because his recent tournament record is terrible. As a matter of fact I don't think I have ever made a post that references oscar's coaching ability as bad. Good coaches get fired a lot.

do you think it's smart to fire good coaches?

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45003
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #19 on: March 23, 2014, 05:24:10 PM »
tournament performance is no indicator of conference strength

but it's a good indicator of coaching prowess?

To an extent, of course it does. Don't be so obtuse. Does your conference recruit for you, train your players, or determine what you run?

I just don't think you can have it both ways. It's a poor indicator for both conference strength and coaching ability.

If you are equating this to our conversation you shouldn't, because I never said that oscar is a bad coach because his recent tournament record is terrible. As a matter of fact I don't think I have ever made a post that references oscar's coaching ability as bad. Good coaches get fired a lot.

do you think it's smart to fire good coaches?

Depends on the circumstance, it was smart for Illinois to do it

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53975
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #20 on: March 23, 2014, 05:59:44 PM »
tournament performance is no indicator of conference strength

but it's a good indicator of coaching prowess?

To an extent, of course it does. Don't be so obtuse. Does your conference recruit for you, train your players, or determine what you run?

I just don't think you can have it both ways. It's a poor indicator for both conference strength and coaching ability.

If you are equating this to our conversation you shouldn't, because I never said that oscar is a bad coach because his recent tournament record is terrible. As a matter of fact I don't think I have ever made a post that references oscar's coaching ability as bad. Good coaches get fired a lot.

do you think it's smart to fire good coaches?

Depends on the circumstance, it was smart for Illinois to do it

You could argue that oscar isn't a good coach and deserved to be fired without considering his tournament record.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13596
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #21 on: March 23, 2014, 06:05:28 PM »
This conference is woefully bad.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45003
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #22 on: March 23, 2014, 06:06:44 PM »
You could argue that oscar isn't a good coach and deserved to be fired without considering his tournament record.

You could but that would involve us having involving elements from a conversation that we aren't currently having.

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7577
    • View Profile
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #23 on: March 23, 2014, 06:07:49 PM »
Drew, you're our only hope :lightsaber:

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: the big 12 may have sucked.
« Reply #24 on: March 23, 2014, 06:09:31 PM »
The A-10, ACC, BE & MWC sucked worse.  Also, we were saddled with a lot of 5 - 9 seeds which would explain few S 16 finishers.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd