Serious question for right wing folks

[OK_Cat]

Pike's whole argument right now is how difficult it is to crash a plane....that was already flying....   

I guarantee that I could crash an already flying 757, and I don't know the first thing about planes.

[Jeffy]

Pike's whole argument right now is how difficult it is to crash a plane....that was already flying....   

I guarantee that I could crash an already flying 757, and I don't know the first thing about planes.

Are you sure you don't want to argue the merits of the Law of Gravity? 

[CHONGS]

Pike's whole argument right now is how difficult it is to crash a plane....that was already flying....   

I guarantee that I could crash an already flying 757, and I don't know the first thing about planes.

Are you sure you don't want to argue the merits of the Law of Gravity? 

Theory!  It's just a theory of gravity!

[Dugout DickStone]

Pike's whole argument right now is how difficult it is to crash a plane....that was already flying....   

I guarantee that I could crash an already flying 757, and I don't know the first thing about planes.

Are you sure you don't want to argue the merits of the Law of Gravity? 

Theory!  It's just a theory of gravity!

Chings, I like you and we have met so I owe you this.  I have reported you to my handler. 

I am sorry, but you are getting too close.

[Jeffy]

Pike's whole argument right now is how difficult it is to crash a plane....that was already flying....   

I guarantee that I could crash an already flying 757, and I don't know the first thing about planes.

Are you sure you don't want to argue the merits of the Law of Gravity? 

Theory!  It's just a theory of gravity!

 

[Saulbadguy]

Pike's whole argument right now is how difficult it is to crash a plane....that was already flying....   

I guarantee that I could crash an already flying 757, and I don't know the first thing about planes.

Are you sure you don't want to argue the merits of the Law of Gravity? 

Theory!  It's just a theory of gravity!

 

BAN IT FROM TEXTBOOKS NOW

[The42Yardstick]

I crash 757's in Microsoft Flight Simulator all the time.

[Jeffy]

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6430933n&tag=contentMain;cbsCarousel

Jihadists and "The Narrative"

[sonofdaxjones]

Pilots for 9-11 truth have looked at the suppossed flight paths and flight characteristics and they are sayin it was some "$hit hot" flying.  Particularly by a guy who a few weeks earlier couldn't get checked out on a Cessna in regards to the Pentagon Pilot.   

It's not a matter of hitting the Pentagon, it's a matter of the flight path, angles of attack, speeds, and turns that were executed by a guy who supposedly 2 weeks earlier couldn't get a Cessna back to the ground, but a few weeks later he got a 757 lined up perfectly to make a 400 plus knot run directly into the side of the Pentagon after executing multiple complex movements in a plane he'd never flown or been checked out on. 

Fascinating.

[OregonSmock]

Yeah, I'm sure crashing a plane into the ground takes tons of practice. 

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

Pilots for 9-11 truth have looked at the suppossed flight paths and flight characteristics and they are sayin it was some "$hit hot" flying.  Particularly by a guy who a few weeks earlier couldn't get checked out on a Cessna in regards to the Pentagon Pilot.   

It's not a matter of hitting the Pentagon, it's a matter of the flight path, angles of attack, speeds, and turns that were executed by a guy who supposedly 2 weeks earlier couldn't get a Cessna back to the ground, but a few weeks later he got a 757 lined up perfectly to make a 400 plus knot run directly into the side of the Pentagon after executing multiple complex movements in a plane he'd never flown or been checked out on. 

Fascinating.

The power of Allah is great!  

[Dugout DickStone]

Pilots for 9-11 truth have looked at the suppossed flight paths and flight characteristics and they are sayin it was some "$hit hot" flying.  Particularly by a guy who a few weeks earlier couldn't get checked out on a Cessna in regards to the Pentagon Pilot.   

It's not a matter of hitting the Pentagon, it's a matter of the flight path, angles of attack, speeds, and turns that were executed by a guy who supposedly 2 weeks earlier couldn't get a Cessna back to the ground, but a few weeks later he got a 757 lined up perfectly to make a 400 plus knot run directly into the side of the Pentagon after executing multiple complex movements in a plane he'd never flown or been checked out on. 

Fascinating.

Well at least they got an objective source.   

[sonofdaxjones]

Limestone you seem to be quite upset about this. 

There is no need for your definition of an "objective source" when the movements and flight path of the airplane are all there for everyone to see and interpret. 

Again, some "$hit hot" flying for a flight school reject, who was not credentialed in any form or fashion in a Boeing 757,  and no amount of Limestone obfuscation and ranting is going to change that reality.

[pike]

Limestone you seem to be quite upset about this. 

There is no need for your definition of an "objective source" when the movements and flight path of the airplane are all there for everyone to see and interpret. 

Again, some "$hit hot" flying for a flight school reject, who was not credentialed in any form or fashion in a Boeing 757,  and no amount of Limestone obfuscation and ranting is going to change that reality.

Last post! You're right!

[Rage Against the McKee]

Limestone you seem to be quite upset about this. 

There is no need for your definition of an "objective source" when the movements and flight path of the airplane are all there for everyone to see and interpret. 

Again, some "$hit hot" flying for a flight school reject, who was not credentialed in any form or fashion in a Boeing 757,  and no amount of Limestone obfuscation and ranting is going to change that reality.

Yes, you have to be a "hot $hit" pilot to know that pushing the stick forward will cause the plane to go down. If the pilot had made those maneuvers and then successfully landed, you might have a point.

[pike]

Limestone you seem to be quite upset about this. 

There is no need for your definition of an "objective source" when the movements and flight path of the airplane are all there for everyone to see and interpret. 

Again, some "$hit hot" flying for a flight school reject, who was not credentialed in any form or fashion in a Boeing 757,  and no amount of Limestone obfuscation and ranting is going to change that reality.

Yes, you have to be a "hot $hit" pilot to know that pushing the stick forward will cause the plane to go down. If the pilot had made those maneuvers and then successfully landed, you might have a point.

Yeah cause flying a 757 like he did is as easy as pushing a stick forward 

[Rage Against the McKee]

Limestone you seem to be quite upset about this. 

There is no need for your definition of an "objective source" when the movements and flight path of the airplane are all there for everyone to see and interpret. 

Again, some "$hit hot" flying for a flight school reject, who was not credentialed in any form or fashion in a Boeing 757,  and no amount of Limestone obfuscation and ranting is going to change that reality.

Yes, you have to be a "hot $hit" pilot to know that pushing the stick forward will cause the plane to go down. If the pilot had made those maneuvers and then successfully landed, you might have a point.

Yeah cause flying a 757 like he did is as easy as pushing a stick forward 

What exactly did he do that was impressive? Please be specific.

[pike]

Limestone you seem to be quite upset about this. 

There is no need for your definition of an "objective source" when the movements and flight path of the airplane are all there for everyone to see and interpret. 

Again, some "$hit hot" flying for a flight school reject, who was not credentialed in any form or fashion in a Boeing 757,  and no amount of Limestone obfuscation and ranting is going to change that reality.

Yes, you have to be a "hot $hit" pilot to know that pushing the stick forward will cause the plane to go down. If the pilot had made those maneuvers and then successfully landed, you might have a point.

Yeah cause flying a 757 like he did is as easy as pushing a stick forward 

What exactly did he do that was impressive? Please be specific.

Turning at a difficult angle from really high up and then navigating to strike the pentagon precisely. Amazing that this guy couldn't even fly a Cessna but could do that.

[WillieWatanabe]

Limestone you seem to be quite upset about this. 

There is no need for your definition of an "objective source" when the movements and flight path of the airplane are all there for everyone to see and interpret. 

Again, some "$hit hot" flying for a flight school reject, who was not credentialed in any form or fashion in a Boeing 757,  and no amount of Limestone obfuscation and ranting is going to change that reality.

Yes, you have to be a "hot $hit" pilot to know that pushing the stick forward will cause the plane to go down. If the pilot had made those maneuvers and then successfully landed, you might have a point.

Yeah cause flying a 757 like he did is as easy as pushing a stick forward 

What exactly did he do that was impressive? Please be specific.

Turning at a difficult angle from really high up and then navigating to strike the pentagon precisely. Amazing that this guy couldn't even fly a Cessna but could do that.

how do we know who was even piloting?

[pike]

Limestone you seem to be quite upset about this. 

There is no need for your definition of an "objective source" when the movements and flight path of the airplane are all there for everyone to see and interpret. 

Again, some "$hit hot" flying for a flight school reject, who was not credentialed in any form or fashion in a Boeing 757,  and no amount of Limestone obfuscation and ranting is going to change that reality.

Yes, you have to be a "hot $hit" pilot to know that pushing the stick forward will cause the plane to go down. If the pilot had made those maneuvers and then successfully landed, you might have a point.

Yeah cause flying a 757 like he did is as easy as pushing a stick forward 

What exactly did he do that was impressive? Please be specific.

Turning at a difficult angle from really high up and then navigating to strike the pentagon precisely. Amazing that this guy couldn't even fly a Cessna but could do that.

how do we know who was even piloting?

Well I thought we all believe what the government told us right?

[Rage Against the McKee]

Limestone you seem to be quite upset about this. 

There is no need for your definition of an "objective source" when the movements and flight path of the airplane are all there for everyone to see and interpret. 

Again, some "$hit hot" flying for a flight school reject, who was not credentialed in any form or fashion in a Boeing 757,  and no amount of Limestone obfuscation and ranting is going to change that reality.

Yes, you have to be a "hot $hit" pilot to know that pushing the stick forward will cause the plane to go down. If the pilot had made those maneuvers and then successfully landed, you might have a point.

Yeah cause flying a 757 like he did is as easy as pushing a stick forward 

What exactly did he do that was impressive? Please be specific.

Turning at a difficult angle from really high up and then navigating to strike the pentagon precisely. Amazing that this guy couldn't even fly a Cessna but could do that.

Maybe he printed off this page and took it on the plane with him. http://www.flightsim.com/main/howto/747.htm

Just skip the section about landing and you're good to go.

[Rage Against the McKee]

Maybe this is the flight school the terrorists went to.

[pike]

Limestone you seem to be quite upset about this. 

There is no need for your definition of an "objective source" when the movements and flight path of the airplane are all there for everyone to see and interpret. 

Again, some "$hit hot" flying for a flight school reject, who was not credentialed in any form or fashion in a Boeing 757,  and no amount of Limestone obfuscation and ranting is going to change that reality.

Yes, you have to be a "hot $hit" pilot to know that pushing the stick forward will cause the plane to go down. If the pilot had made those maneuvers and then successfully landed, you might have a point.

Yeah cause flying a 757 like he did is as easy as pushing a stick forward 

What exactly did he do that was impressive? Please be specific.

Turning at a difficult angle from really high up and then navigating to strike the pentagon precisely. Amazing that this guy couldn't even fly a Cessna but could do that.

Maybe he printed off this page and took it on the plane with him. http://www.flightsim.com/main/howto/747.htm

Just skip the section about landing and you're good to go.

Another thing that baffles me is that we're supposed to believe these dudes learned how to fly by using flight sim. Yeah right.

[WillieWatanabe]

Limestone you seem to be quite upset about this. 

There is no need for your definition of an "objective source" when the movements and flight path of the airplane are all there for everyone to see and interpret. 

Again, some "$hit hot" flying for a flight school reject, who was not credentialed in any form or fashion in a Boeing 757,  and no amount of Limestone obfuscation and ranting is going to change that reality.

Yes, you have to be a "hot $hit" pilot to know that pushing the stick forward will cause the plane to go down. If the pilot had made those maneuvers and then successfully landed, you might have a point.

Yeah cause flying a 757 like he did is as easy as pushing a stick forward 

What exactly did he do that was impressive? Please be specific.

Turning at a difficult angle from really high up and then navigating to strike the pentagon precisely. Amazing that this guy couldn't even fly a Cessna but could do that.

how do we know who was even piloting?

Well I thought we all believe what the government told us right?

Don't rough ridin' BMW jedi mind trick me. Answer the question.

[Trim]

Is Brook Berringer even dead?