Watching I felt that Gip played a whale of the game in close, really attacked, but he "forced" more shots than we are going to get away with if we are going to win. It may be a give and take, but there were many opportunities that I feel were lost from Gip putting up a bad shot. Still, a lot of this was probably due to him having what was overall a pretty phenomenal game. Almost like a heat check for an inside guy, except instead of tossing up an open 24-footer he was trying to put up a shot where he didn't really have position/ leverage or wasn't as deep as he needed to be.
That's a pretty good assessment, but I think that was in part by design.
In the first half Gip was 5 of 6 (19% of our shots) with 10 points. The rest of the team was 9 of 25. I think there was a clear directive to keep feeding Gip.
In the 2nd half Gip was 5 of 12 (40% of our shots) with 14 points. The rest of the team was 7 of 18.
He finished a solid 10 of 18, but the 2nd half was inefficient enough that it probably took away from other things that we do well. I understand going away from shooting 3s when we only went 3 of 12 in the first half, but only 4 3PTAs in 30 FGAs is getting out of balance for our offense.
Granted, we still had a ton of good looks in the 2nd half and Thomas and Foster going 1-9 combined was a big factor along with Gip being more inefficient than he was in the first half.
Regardless, our defense wasn't good enough to win (K-State has won 1 game a year on the road when giving up 1.07 ppp going back the last 5-6 years) despite doing a great job of controlling the pace.