Author Topic: Reasons We Could Win in AFH  (Read 19529 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #25 on: January 09, 2014, 02:13:37 PM »
13-28 from 3 and at least 45% on 2s.
Play even on oboards.
Win TO% battle.
Don't get out FT rated by more than 10%.
<10 PTs for KU in transition.
Straight to the bottom?

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #26 on: January 09, 2014, 02:14:19 PM »
13-28 from 3 and at least 45% on 2s.
Play even on oboards.
Win TO% battle.
Don't get out FT rated by more than 10%.
<10 PTs for KU in transition.
Straight to the bottom?

You don't wanna know.

Offline GBEMAW

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 130
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #27 on: January 09, 2014, 02:15:29 PM »
a player of a much higher caliber than mario little doing mario little type things

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #28 on: January 09, 2014, 02:15:54 PM »
13-28 from 3 and at least 45% on 2s.
Play even on oboards.
Win TO% battle.
Don't get out FT rated by more than 10%.
<10 PTs for KU in transition.
Straight to the bottom?

You don't wanna know.
I just caught up and saw it. _FAN has been wrong before, and he is always forgiven...this time, I am going to rub it in his fat <advanced> stat face! :curse: :curse:

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6067
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #29 on: January 09, 2014, 02:16:20 PM »
bb guns

bar fights

relations with pre-teens

payment of players through proxy

adulteress head coach

playing of academically ineligible player

ticket scandal

porn star scandal

doug compton scandal

ain't no seats


wait nevermind these have never helped before :(

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #30 on: January 09, 2014, 02:20:27 PM »
We won there in '06 because we held them to 32% shooting and didn't get blown out in the first 5:00. Seems to be a pretty good formula  :dunno:

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #31 on: January 09, 2014, 02:27:07 PM »
13-28 from 3 and at least 45% on 2s.
Play even on oboards.
Win TO% battle.
Don't get out FT rated by more than 10%.
<10 PTs for KU in transition.
Straight to the bottom?

You don't wanna know.
I just caught up and saw it. _FAN has been wrong before, and he is always forgiven...this time, I am going to rub it in his fat <advanced> stat face! :curse: :curse:

I hope I'm wrong, but he's the bottom.

Cats 62 Hawks 76

 :frown:

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #32 on: January 09, 2014, 02:27:34 PM »
I haven't been this confident about a game in Lawrence since '06.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13753
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #33 on: January 09, 2014, 02:30:18 PM »
Zombiepocalypse

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #34 on: January 09, 2014, 02:45:05 PM »
I don't know why we do this to ourselves every year.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline #LIFE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1792
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #35 on: January 09, 2014, 02:45:23 PM »

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #36 on: January 09, 2014, 02:49:56 PM »
Hold them under 70, Gip and DJamer combine for less than 5 first half fouls, Shane plays worth a damn, Foster does Foster things, JT turns it over twice or less, hit 75% from the FT line, and hope for the best.

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6930
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #37 on: January 09, 2014, 02:54:07 PM »
Who are the officials for Saturday?
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline #LIFE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1792
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #38 on: January 09, 2014, 02:57:04 PM »

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #39 on: January 09, 2014, 02:57:45 PM »
13-28 from 3 and at least 45% on 2s.
Play even on oboards.
Win TO% battle.
Don't get out FT rated by more than 10%.
<10 PTs for KU in transition.
If we do that we are going to kill them.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #40 on: January 09, 2014, 02:59:50 PM »
Our defense is the #12 adjD on kenpom. That's higher than any final Defense ranking in kenpom history for the Kansas State Wildcats.

Offline stobblebobby

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 171
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #41 on: January 09, 2014, 03:00:31 PM »
NBA draft moved up to tomorrow.

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #42 on: January 09, 2014, 03:01:21 PM »
Have any of you dumbasses watched a KU game this year? They really aren't that good.

Offline SEK_EMAW

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1103
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #43 on: January 09, 2014, 03:13:29 PM »
AFH DJamer accidentally deletes Thunderstruck from his playlist.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #44 on: January 09, 2014, 03:14:28 PM »
I hope I'm wrong, but he's the bottom.

Cats 62 Hawks 76

 :frown:

Huh, ksu_FraidyCat?  Look him in the eyes and tell him that. 


Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #45 on: January 09, 2014, 03:14:52 PM »
I've run through every scenario in my head. Not one scenario do we lose.  :Wha:

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #46 on: January 09, 2014, 03:15:14 PM »
Our defense is the #12 adjD on kenpom. That's higher than any final Defense ranking in kenpom history for the Kansas State Wildcats.

True.

And our 10 team only allowed .91 PPP for the season and KU scored 1.27 PPP and 82 points against us in Lawrence.

Since Wooly's band of overachievers walked out of Allen Field House in 2006 (holding KU to 55 points and .83 PPP) the Cats have...

Allowed an average of 86.4 ppg and 1.26 ppp.
Only once held KU under 70 points and 1.20 ppp. (but KU held K-State to .76 ppp and 49 points)
Scored an average of 64.9 ppg and .95 ppp.
The highest point total was 77 (KU scored 103) and hightest ppp was 1.05.
Played at an average pace of 68.6 with a high of 73 possessions and a low of 63 possessions.

I hope we can change the trend, but it doesn't look good to me. Perhaps I've just seen it too much.

Granted, this is Self's "worst" defense since 05, allowing a blistering.95 ppp (#25 nationally). The 05 defense "only" finished #25 nationally as well at .93 ppp. Only one other defense finished outside of kenpom's Top 10 (#11 in 2011).

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #47 on: January 09, 2014, 03:21:02 PM »
cheese and rise _FraidyCat, you want some cheese with that wine?  I know you like stats, so try this one out:  Marcus Foster is a badass 100% of the time.

I’m sorry to disappoint you (and Mike Gundy), but we’re going to win.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #48 on: January 09, 2014, 03:23:14 PM »
Our defense is the #12 adjD on kenpom. That's higher than any final Defense ranking in kenpom history for the Kansas State Wildcats.

True.

And our 10 team only allowed .91 PPP for the season and KU scored 1.27 PPP and 82 points against us in Lawrence.

Since Wooly's band of overachievers walked out of Allen Field House in 2006 (holding KU to 55 points and .83 PPP) the Cats have...

Allowed an average of 86.4 ppg and 1.26 ppp.
Only once held KU under 70 points and 1.20 ppp. (but KU held K-State to .76 ppp and 49 points)
Scored an average of 64.9 ppg and .95 ppp.
The highest point total was 77 (KU scored 103) and hightest ppp was 1.05.
Played at an average pace of 68.6 with a high of 73 possessions and a low of 63 possessions.

I hope we can change the trend, but it doesn't look good to me. Perhaps I've just seen it too much.

Granted, this is Self's "worst" defense since 05, allowing a blistering.95 ppp (#25 nationally). The 05 defense "only" finished #25 nationally as well at .93 ppp. Only one other defense finished outside of kenpom's Top 10 (#11 in 2011).

random variances

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Reasons We Could Win in AFH
« Reply #49 on: January 09, 2014, 03:24:02 PM »
cheese and rise _FraidyCat, you want some cheese with that wine?  I know you like stats, so try this one out:  Marcus Foster is a badass 100% of the time.

I’m sorry to disappoint you (and Mike Gundy), but we’re going to win.

Bill Self was so angry after Wooly walked out with a win he clearly vowed to never lose to K-State in Lawrence again. Its just too much to overcome.