Author Topic: Running Back 2014  (Read 2063 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Microwave

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 87
    • View Profile
Running Back 2014
« on: December 09, 2013, 12:54:02 AM »
Damarcus? -- 4 star junior that doesn't play
Leverett?  -- New starter imho
Jones?
Warmack? -- True freshman
Sams? -- I can dream





(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88406
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Running Back 2014
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2013, 06:20:48 AM »
You dream about Sams playing RB?

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30944
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Running Back 2014
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2013, 06:48:22 AM »
It's a huge hole right now. 

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: Running Back 2014
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2013, 07:18:04 AM »
It's a huge hole unknown right now.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88406
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Running Back 2014
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2013, 07:22:04 AM »
the thing is, we have no idea what we have. bill is more tentative about playing unproven RBs than he is QBs. he really has trust issues. and because of that our unproven RBs stay unproven. NOW WHAT BILL?

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: Running Back 2014
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2013, 07:28:07 AM »
the thing is, we have no idea what we have. bill is more tentative about playing unproven RBs than he is QBs. he really has trust issues. and because of that our unproven RBs stay unproven. NOW WHAT BILL?

well, we aren't going after any JuCo RBs that I know of. so Bill must be ok with what we have in Robinson, Leverett and Charles.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88406
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Running Back 2014
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2013, 07:31:39 AM »
the thing is, we have no idea what we have. bill is more tentative about playing unproven RBs than he is QBs. he really has trust issues. and because of that our unproven RBs stay unproven. NOW WHAT BILL?

well, we aren't going after any JuCo RBs that I know of. so Bill must be ok with what we have in Robinson, Leverett and Charles.

there were grumblings that we were still watching juco RBs. apparently not a high concern of ours though.

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: Running Back 2014
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2013, 07:47:12 AM »
the thing is, we have no idea what we have. bill is more tentative about playing unproven RBs than he is QBs. he really has trust issues. and because of that our unproven RBs stay unproven. NOW WHAT BILL?

well, we aren't going after any JuCo RBs that I know of. so Bill must be ok with what we have in Robinson, Leverett and Charles.

there were grumblings that we were still watching juco RBs. apparently not a high concern of ours though.

it's also not a good JuCo RB class

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47930
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Running Back 2014
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2013, 08:02:53 AM »
i'm never really concerned about our running backs.  with snyder's commitment to developing OL play, we always have someone back there who will get yards.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Running Back 2014
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2013, 08:04:47 AM »
Not worried

Offline Microwave

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 87
    • View Profile
Re: Running Back 2014
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2013, 10:54:21 AM »
You dream about Sams playing RB?

i dream of him being on the field period, and we have been seeing less and less of him.  We need his explosiveness, and if a position switch is necessary so be it

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13334
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Running Back 2014
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2013, 10:55:33 AM »
You dream about Sams playing RB?

i dream of him being on the field period, and we have been seeing less and less of him.  We need his explosiveness, and if a position switch is necessary so be it
Just wait until next year.
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Running Back 2014
« Reply #12 on: December 09, 2013, 10:57:33 AM »
I think Robinson will get his shot.  Leverett will, too.

If we're in a pinch, and we actually look like we have a shot at winning a conference title, he'll probably burn Warmack's redshirt if he thinks that will help.

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: Running Back 2014
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2013, 11:00:59 AM »
Leverett?  -- New starter imho
He was offensive scout player of the year his freshman year. Gives me some hope