Poll

december record

3-0
30 (33%)
2-1
20 (22%)
1-2
18 (19.8%)
0-3
23 (25.3%)

Total Members Voted: 90

Author Topic: december record v "good" teams  (Read 12645 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
december record v "good" teams
« on: December 01, 2013, 07:20:45 PM »
ol miss, gonzaga and g. washington.  all at home or near home.

i think 1-2.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2013, 07:27:17 PM »
hi, I'm a forced conversation about ksu basketball.  how are you doing tonight?

Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2013, 07:31:25 PM »
Tell ya what, I'm hoping for a record with a three and a zero in it. I'll probably still get that, but the opposite of the one I wanted, and it will make me  pretty sad.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42642
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2013, 07:35:13 PM »
sys, you have this set where people can pick up to 4 options.  Contingencies?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38112
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2013, 07:35:20 PM »
Who is the 1, Sys.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2013, 07:43:56 PM »
sys, you have this set where people can pick up to 4 options.  Contingencies?

i prolly just don't know how to make polls.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #6 on: December 01, 2013, 07:44:53 PM »
hi, I'm a forced conversation about ksu basketball.  how are you doing tonight?

did you vote, zacker?  it doesn't look like you did.  you aren't allowed to post if you don't vote.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2013, 07:45:30 PM »
Lizard lips won't have his team ready to play against Ole Miss and George Washington, but we'll be amped up to play vs. Gonzaga and we'll still get destroyed: 0-3  :th_twocents:
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #8 on: December 01, 2013, 07:45:50 PM »
Who is the 1, Sys.

doesn't matter, it's probabilistic.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #9 on: December 01, 2013, 07:50:31 PM »
I went optimistic. We beat Henderson and the president.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42642
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2013, 07:59:36 PM »
sys, you have this set where people can pick up to 4 options.  Contingencies?

i prolly just don't know how to make polls.

Fixed it.

Everyone now, choose wisely.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55979
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2013, 08:08:42 PM »
Didn't know GW was "good"

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38112
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #12 on: December 01, 2013, 08:11:46 PM »
I would totally vote but tapatalk and polls evidently don't get along. 

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29372
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #13 on: December 01, 2013, 08:12:36 PM »
Didn't know GW was "good"

i think it's a relative term

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47981
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #14 on: December 01, 2013, 08:19:08 PM »

Didn't know GW was "good"
beat creighton tonight, doesn't have to equal good, but def strongly capable


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #15 on: December 01, 2013, 08:19:59 PM »
Didn't know GW was "good"

they're ok.  better kenpom # than kstate.


i watched part of their win over creighton today.  couple of physical bigs that can score if they have room (did kstate recruit armwood, way back when?).  good rebounding team.  not v. good defensively.  pg doesn't shoot.  wings shoot.  euro big that shoots, hates the interior.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #16 on: December 02, 2013, 06:42:01 AM »
hi, I'm a forced conversation about ksu basketball.  how are you doing tonight?

did you vote, zacker?  it doesn't look like you did.  you aren't allowed to post if you don't vote.

I did not vote because the option I would choose is not up there.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45943
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #17 on: December 02, 2013, 08:52:28 AM »
2-1, just a hunch nothing I've seen on the court leads me to think this is going to happen though.

We are really small. Are we also getting a mysbig at the semester :fingerscrossed:

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47981
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #18 on: December 02, 2013, 08:58:29 AM »
here's the clams calcs as per clams-

on offense:  no bigs = no presence in paint = out rebounded = fewer shots = relying on freshman guards to shoot high percentage every night = losing a lot

on defense:  no bigs = out rebounded = more offense for opponent = more fouls on our freshman guards x will spradling factor =  losing a lot

including the comment "all at home or near home" makes no difference.  there's a whole shitload that needs to go right for this team to win against a decent team.

we're going to lose a lot this season, 0-3 against these 3 teams is the most probable outcome


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #19 on: December 02, 2013, 09:39:10 AM »
great epi of clams click clack calcs. will tune in next week.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38028
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #20 on: December 02, 2013, 09:46:22 AM »
I think 1-2 is most likely, but my gut is telling my 0-3 so I went with that.

Offline joaks01

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 66
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #21 on: December 03, 2013, 01:21:07 PM »
Heart says 2-1, but brain says 1-2.
Went with the heart :eye:

Offline ltrain

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 256
  • go cats
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #22 on: December 03, 2013, 03:38:12 PM »
We're really bad (see losses to Northern Colorado, Charlotte **not the pro team** and to G-Town by almost 30).  0-3.
Wondering who is running this hot dog stand and seriously considering heading out for tacos.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30958
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #23 on: December 03, 2013, 03:46:46 PM »
We're really bad (see losses to Northern Colorado, Charlotte **not the pro team** and to G-Town by almost 30).  0-3.

I cannot argue with this logic.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18083
    • View Profile
Re: december record v "good" teams
« Reply #24 on: December 03, 2013, 03:53:10 PM »
I'm surprised at the number of people still in denial over just how bad this team is.  0-3 with one loss by less than 15 (moral victory)