Author Topic: Shockers  (Read 93482 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yoman

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1213
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #200 on: February 12, 2014, 12:24:00 AM »
I don't like most WSU fans much, but this Shockers team is really fun to watch. Has a Frank Martin vibe to it (although they are noticeably different). The Play Angry stuff is overplayed, but I can't help but kinda like it. Add in that WSU has always been a guilty pleasure, second team for me, and I am happy for them.
I think this yoman guy is on to something....

Offline lopakman

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2449
  • #1Wiggins
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #201 on: February 12, 2014, 08:19:00 AM »
@lopakman

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #202 on: February 12, 2014, 08:47:30 AM »
I do kind of like the latest WuShuck fan talking point in regards to K-State, that is, K-State has only won 1 true road game this year.   Which is true, the other true road game losses were at KU, at Texas, and at Iowa State.   Granted, those teams are no 11-13 Northern Iowa, but facts are facts.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #203 on: February 12, 2014, 08:51:06 AM »
they'd be hanging around 6th'ish in the B12 this season. which would be their highest ever hanging around area of conference standings in their programs history.

Offline massofcatfan

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 782
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #204 on: February 12, 2014, 11:21:55 AM »
bonus of WSU doing well is that it rubs salt in wounds of little Mark's ongoing failure at University of Maryland*

*(I obviously refer to infamous squawker and ex-wsu coach Mark Turgeon)
I want to wake up in a city that never sleeps, etc.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #205 on: February 12, 2014, 11:23:44 AM »
Do you want them to keep winning so they could potentially be the first 1 seed to lose to a 16, because I do

This would be fantastic.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #206 on: February 12, 2014, 12:01:04 PM »
Do you want them to keep winning so they could potentially be the first 1 seed to lose to a 16, because I do
:drool:

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #207 on: February 12, 2014, 12:15:06 PM »

25-0.

 :Woohoo:

Why the woohoo? Do you want them to keep winning so they could potentially be the first 1 seed to lose to a 16, because I do

it is my dream
emaw

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #208 on: February 12, 2014, 12:18:20 PM »
They'd be mentioned everywhere forever.

"Only one team has ever lost to a 16 seed, undefeated Wichita State in 2014"

 :crossfingers:

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #209 on: February 12, 2014, 02:09:59 PM »

They'd be mentioned everywhere forever.

"Only one team has ever lost to a 16 seed, undefeated Wichita State in 2014"

:boing:

Offline lopakman

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2449
  • #1Wiggins
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #210 on: February 12, 2014, 02:14:32 PM »

25-0.

 :Woohoo:

Why the woohoo? Do you want them to keep winning so they could potentially be the first 1 seed to lose to a 16, because I do

Because I like Wichita State.
@lopakman

Offline ydarg2012

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1116
  • Snyder 4 President
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #211 on: February 12, 2014, 02:32:36 PM »
Although it probably won't happen, I'd love to see WSU and ku end up meeting up fairly early.  I'm not sure the interwebs could handle the level of ku butthurt that would come out of a WSU loss... 

After the game ended, Nick would give Andy a hug, wipe his tears and say "Sorry, Lil Bro..." and we (awesome good people K-Stater's) would console our TSC bros in much the same way: "Sorry, lil bro... sorry".

 :tsc:

If this could happen I would love it like. . .sooo much.  :lol:

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #212 on: February 12, 2014, 03:00:15 PM »
I absolutely love WSU. Early, Baker, Cotton are adorable; the whole damn team is adorable.  Easily my second favorite team, and the cherry on top of that fiery, fudge dragon sundae (Thanks, CK!) is that KU fans are so threatened by their success. It is absolutely b-e-a-utiful!
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41988
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #213 on: February 15, 2014, 09:17:24 AM »
http://www.kansas.com/2014/02/14/3287600/shocker-party-so-big-at-koch-arena.html

Especially funny for those that know of Tony Adame and/or Revolution Rock Bar.

Offline Headinjun

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1226
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #214 on: February 15, 2014, 09:49:08 AM »

25-0.

 :Woohoo:

Why the woohoo? Do you want them to keep winning so they could potentially be the first 1 seed to lose to a 16, because I do

Trust me, they're not gonna be that team.  They're actually good enough to take care of that portion of the tourney. 

Offline Headinjun

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1226
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #215 on: February 15, 2014, 09:52:19 AM »
they'd be hanging around 6th'ish in the B12 this season. which would be their highest ever hanging around area of conference standings in their programs history.

You should get your facts straight.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Shockers
« Reply #216 on: February 15, 2014, 09:57:34 AM »

I'll continue to maintain that crap talking the shox is extremely small-timey, and that a lot of you should be ashamed of yourselves
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #217 on: February 15, 2014, 10:34:52 AM »

they'd be hanging around 6th'ish in the B12 this season. which would be their highest ever hanging around area of conference standings in their programs history.

You should get your facts straight.

You should get your face straight.

Offline gatoveintisiet

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 772
  • the maverick
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #218 on: February 15, 2014, 11:06:21 AM »
Who threatens people anymore?  Wow :facepalm:
You are dipping into the Kool Aid and you don't even know what flavor it is.

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #219 on: February 15, 2014, 11:08:13 AM »
Who threatens people anymore?  Wow :facepalm:

wut

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21453
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #220 on: February 15, 2014, 12:19:24 PM »
Who threatens people anymore?  Wow :facepalm:

Is this a threat?

Offline Headinjun

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1226
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #221 on: February 15, 2014, 12:30:22 PM »

they'd be hanging around 6th'ish in the B12 this season. which would be their highest ever hanging around area of conference standings in their programs history.

You should get your facts straight.

You should get your face straight.

Minus the 90s the Shox have been a pretty formidable team in the Valley.

They went a Final Four in the 60s and even gained a #1 ranking the early 80s. All Im trying to say Stevie is that they have a decent history and one that is comparable to ours in terms of tourney appearances, final fours, and conference champs.   

Don't hate 

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3757
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #222 on: February 15, 2014, 01:14:31 PM »
Guys, why all the hate towards baby bro? Can't we just enjoy being part of the best college basketball state in the country?

Offline Headinjun

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1226
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #223 on: February 15, 2014, 01:20:47 PM »
WSU is like the cute baby bro that you like to see learning and developing, but still doesn't clean up or have all his manners straight, while KU is the sibling within age range that borrows stuff and doesn't return them or keeps you up all night when his punk ass friends are over. 

Offline gatoveintisiet

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 772
  • the maverick
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #224 on: February 15, 2014, 03:22:56 PM »
The most endearing part about wsu is how butthurt ku fans are about them.
You are dipping into the Kool Aid and you don't even know what flavor it is.