Author Topic: Shooting thru 2 games:  (Read 6863 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #25 on: November 14, 2013, 10:02:04 PM »
The basketball was ugly sometimes, but I always appreciated that Frank's teams played really hard consistently. And that ability to simply play hard won a lot of games.

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10542
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #26 on: November 14, 2013, 10:06:07 PM »
If you like winning NCAA tournament games you probably liked Frank.  If you like comparing shooting percentages you probably don't.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38080
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #27 on: November 14, 2013, 10:07:29 PM »
Guys, how many of franks first two games were losses?

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #28 on: November 14, 2013, 10:10:27 PM »
Guys, how many of franks first two games were losses?

WtF are you talking about?

goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline 1863

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 389
  • John Currie is a beautiful human bean.
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #29 on: November 14, 2013, 10:17:33 PM »
All I know is that if Weber has a losing home record then he HAS to go. We haven't had a losing home record since 1946.

Not one losing record in Ahearn or home losing record in Bramlage.

13 different coaches managed to win.

If Weber manages to screw that up I don't care how good the numbers are or how many "moral victories" we get. I can't believe this is actually a concern.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #30 on: November 14, 2013, 10:17:56 PM »
Shane, he's a better passer than Angel.

 :lol:
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #31 on: November 14, 2013, 10:32:14 PM »

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #32 on: November 14, 2013, 10:47:11 PM »
Shane, he's a better passer than Angel.

 :lol:

I know, I mean, wtf?

Dax always manages to blow up his own arguments by saying outrageous stuff like this, because it totally derails the thread. There probably isn't anything that Shane is better at than Angel, and trying to make an argument that Shane is a better passer than the best distributor in K-State history is really unbelievable.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #33 on: November 14, 2013, 10:54:53 PM »
Shane, he's a better passer than Angel.

 :lol:

I know, I mean, wtf?

Dax always manages to blow up his own arguments by saying outrageous stuff like this, because it totally derails the thread. There probably isn't anything that Shane is better at than Angel, and trying to make an argument that Shane is a better passer than the best distributor in K-State history is really unbelievable.

Better 3-point shooter than Angel. 43.6% to 34.4% last season.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38080
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #34 on: November 15, 2013, 07:39:47 AM »
Shane, he's a better passer than Angel.

 :lol:
Angel the shooting guard or Shane the point guard?

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2


Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #35 on: November 15, 2013, 08:06:18 AM »
JO has the school record for blocks for fucks sake.

Offline #LIFE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1792
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #36 on: November 15, 2013, 08:10:55 AM »
Seems to me it was oscar that made JO suck last year  :dunno:

Offline hatingfrancisco

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4518
    • View Profile
    • Tweet Tweet
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #37 on: November 15, 2013, 08:11:23 AM »
I am too, FWIW. Eff him for not getting along with his boss. Man up!

Very underrated post FWIW.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2013, 10:41:25 AM by hatingfrancis »

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59566
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #38 on: November 15, 2013, 08:47:18 AM »
Look at the Frankites:  Fighting, scratching, clawing, flailing and failing.   It's like listening to the K-State Coaches Radio Show brought to by Ohse Meats. Featuring K-State Head Basketball Coach Dana Altman.

 :thumbsup: . yet sad


Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38080
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #39 on: November 15, 2013, 09:46:53 AM »
Seems to me it was oscar that made JO suck last year  :dunno:

Yep.

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13505
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #40 on: November 15, 2013, 09:55:51 AM »
Look at the Frankites:  Fighting, scratching, clawing, flailing and failing.   It's like listening to the K-State Coaches Radio Show brought to by Ohse Meats. Featuring K-State Head Basketball Coach Dana Altman.

 :thumbsup: . yet sad
I don't think its Frankites. I think its people calling you out for making a stupid comment

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59566
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #41 on: November 15, 2013, 10:03:30 AM »
Oh, I see, a battle of opinions.

Shane with 8 assists against ORU tho.






« Last Edit: November 15, 2013, 10:06:33 AM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38080
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #42 on: November 15, 2013, 10:07:09 AM »
so we are talking about shane the point guard then, not shane the power forward?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59566
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #43 on: November 15, 2013, 10:10:11 AM »
so we are talking about shane the point guard then, not shane the power forward?

So we're actually breaking this down by position, and not the actual ability to pass the ball then?


Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38080
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #44 on: November 15, 2013, 10:37:47 AM »
If we are only worried about good passing ability, the idea that the pass has to immediately result in a score to be a good pass is ridiculous, right?  I mean, Gipson completes kick out passes successfully all the time.  No love for Gip?

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #45 on: November 15, 2013, 10:49:17 AM »
Shane, he's a better passer than Angel.

 :lol:


I know, I mean, wtf?

Dax always manages to blow up his own arguments by saying outrageous stuff like this, because it totally derails the thread. There probably isn't anything that Shane is better at than Angel, and trying to make an argument that Shane is a better passer than the best distributor in K-State history is really unbelievable.

Better 3-point shooter than Angel. 43.6% to 34.4% last season.

When Shane was a sophomore he shot .240 from behind the arc, so  :dunno:
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #46 on: November 15, 2013, 10:51:06 AM »
I wouldn't even say Shane is a good passer.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38080
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #47 on: November 15, 2013, 10:52:04 AM »
I wouldn't even say Shane is a good passer.

I would.  I think he is a pretty elite passer. 

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #48 on: November 15, 2013, 10:52:15 AM »
Shane, he's a better passer than Angel.

 :lol:


I know, I mean, wtf?

Dax always manages to blow up his own arguments by saying outrageous stuff like this, because it totally derails the thread. There probably isn't anything that Shane is better at than Angel, and trying to make an argument that Shane is a better passer than the best distributor in K-State history is really unbelievable.

Better 3-point shooter than Angel. 43.6% to 34.4% last season.

When Shane was a sophomore he shot .240 from behind the arc, so  :dunno:

Yeah, he totally sucks at shooting. :dubious:

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Shooting thru 2 games:
« Reply #49 on: November 15, 2013, 12:17:57 PM »
Shane, he's a better passer than Angel.

 :lol:


I know, I mean, wtf?

Dax always manages to blow up his own arguments by saying outrageous stuff like this, because it totally derails the thread. There probably isn't anything that Shane is better at than Angel, and trying to make an argument that Shane is a better passer than the best distributor in K-State history is really unbelievable.

Better 3-point shooter than Angel. 43.6% to 34.4% last season.

When Shane was a sophomore he shot .240 from behind the arc, so  :dunno:

Yeah, he totally sucks at shooting. :dubious:

here is deuce's point -----> *
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

here is you -----> *