Author Topic: +2.5  (Read 7671 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18072
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #25 on: November 03, 2013, 12:49:14 PM »
I think Tech is better.  I wouldn't bet against Snyder to outfox true frosh QBs and a rookie head coach, tho. 
« Last Edit: November 03, 2013, 01:17:43 PM by ChiCat »

Offline BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1423
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #26 on: November 03, 2013, 12:52:59 PM »
31% chance of winning out.  Will take.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: +2.5
« Reply #27 on: November 03, 2013, 02:52:40 PM »
our secondary isn't good enough to beat tech.

You're an idiot. 
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: +2.5
« Reply #28 on: November 03, 2013, 02:55:21 PM »
This is going to be one off those games where ttech doesn't possess the ball long enough to rack up points.  Their run defense looked like garbage yesterday. 
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: +2.5
« Reply #29 on: November 03, 2013, 03:39:35 PM »
our secondary isn't good enough to beat tech.

You're an idiot.

Please bet your life on dorian roberts.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #30 on: November 03, 2013, 03:39:44 PM »
as much as i love this baylor team (which is a lot) we're the toughest opponent they've faced, and we had a legitimate shot to win that game late.  as we all learned last year, going undefeated is very hard.

i wouldn't be surprised if Baylor blows it against OU.  i sure hope they don't though.  -13 seems too much to me.

We are a better team than OU and I don't think Baylor has any trouble at all. They will win by about 30.

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #31 on: November 03, 2013, 03:46:37 PM »
as much as i love this baylor team (which is a lot) we're the toughest opponent they've faced, and we had a legitimate shot to win that game late.  as we all learned last year, going undefeated is very hard.

i wouldn't be surprised if Baylor blows it against OU.  i sure hope they don't though.  -13 seems too much to me.

We are a better team than OU and I don't think Baylor has any trouble at all. They will win by about 30.

Please tell me what makes you think this. I think we have a good shot at beating OU but I don't think we are a better overall team.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #32 on: November 03, 2013, 03:50:01 PM »
as much as i love this baylor team (which is a lot) we're the toughest opponent they've faced, and we had a legitimate shot to win that game late.  as we all learned last year, going undefeated is very hard.

i wouldn't be surprised if Baylor blows it against OU.  i sure hope they don't though.  -13 seems too much to me.

We are a better team than OU and I don't think Baylor has any trouble at all. They will win by about 30.

Please tell me what makes you think this. I think we have a good shot at beating OU but I don't think we are a better overall team.

Have you watched them play? What game have they looked impressive in? Is it their 16-7 win over WVU? Or maybe their 20-17 win over TCU? Baylor, Oklahoma State, and Kansas State are going to light OU up.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #33 on: November 03, 2013, 04:16:30 PM »
we're going to smash these fools like a large smashing device.  afterwards they will say, wow we got smashed really bad.
emaw

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #34 on: November 03, 2013, 04:20:16 PM »
we're going to smash these fools like a large smashing device.  afterwards they will say, wow we got smashed really bad.

Yep. Cats by 12.

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #35 on: November 03, 2013, 05:16:56 PM »
as much as i love this baylor team (which is a lot) we're the toughest opponent they've faced, and we had a legitimate shot to win that game late.  as we all learned last year, going undefeated is very hard.

i wouldn't be surprised if Baylor blows it against OU.  i sure hope they don't though.  -13 seems too much to me.

We are a better team than OU and I don't think Baylor has any trouble at all. They will win by about 30.

Please tell me what makes you think this. I think we have a good shot at beating OU but I don't think we are a better overall team.

Have you watched them play? What game have they looked impressive in? Is it their 16-7 win over WVU? Or maybe their 20-17 win over TCU? Baylor, Oklahoma State, and Kansas State are going to light OU up.

Have you watched us play? Our best win is against Louisiana Lafayette. No other team we've beaten is even going to make it to a bowl game. We have looked good the past two weekends but we have played two terrible teams. OU's wins against ND and Tech are way better than any wins we have.

OU's game Thursday and our game at Tech this weekend will be very telling about who is the better team, but right now I just don't see how you can say we are a better overall team than OU.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67468
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #36 on: November 03, 2013, 05:25:09 PM »
OU is pretty bad guys.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18072
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #37 on: November 03, 2013, 05:26:24 PM »
as much as i love this baylor team (which is a lot) we're the toughest opponent they've faced, and we had a legitimate shot to win that game late.  as we all learned last year, going undefeated is very hard.

i wouldn't be surprised if Baylor blows it against OU.  i sure hope they don't though.  -13 seems too much to me.

We are a better team than OU and I don't think Baylor has any trouble at all. They will win by about 30.

Please tell me what makes you think this. I think we have a good shot at beating OU but I don't think we are a better overall team.

Have you watched them play? What game have they looked impressive in? Is it their 16-7 win over WVU? Or maybe their 20-17 win over TCU? Baylor, Oklahoma State, and Kansas State are going to light OU up.

Have you watched us play? Our best win is against Louisiana Lafayette. No other team we've beaten is even going to make it to a bowl game. We have looked good the past two weekends but we have played two terrible teams. OU's wins against ND and Tech are way better than any wins we have.

OU's game Thursday and our game at Tech this weekend will be very telling about who is the better team, but right now I just don't see how you can say we are a better overall team than OU.

You could say it because we beat WV by a bunch more.    Also that we played UT closer and at their place.  Two common opponents, we looked better against both of them.  Not saying I would agree that we are better, but that's how you would say it.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22787
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #38 on: November 03, 2013, 05:28:20 PM »
WVU is going to a bowl game. They have to win in lawrence KU and beat ISU at home.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #39 on: November 03, 2013, 05:49:41 PM »
I forgot wallerstadt is their D coordinator, I don't know how to feel about that. I think he kinda sucks though.

Clint Chelf agrees...  And I'm pretty sure he is still running wild through their defense.

 :ROFL:
bears are fast...

Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4210
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #40 on: November 03, 2013, 06:07:46 PM »
our secondary isn't good enough to beat tech.

This.  Plus we play the game on the equivalent of the far side of the moon.

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #41 on: November 03, 2013, 06:10:07 PM »
Bet all the farms 45-16

Offline kostakio

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 475
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #42 on: November 03, 2013, 06:39:14 PM »
OU isn't going to touch Baylor in Waco.  They got beat  the last time they played down there and that was a better OU team against a worse Baylor team.  I honestly would pick Baylor to beat any team in the nation if the game was in Waco. 

As for our game the spread is a few points closer than i expected.  It's tough to win at tech but Snyder seems to win these types of games more often that not.  Especially when he has a little bit of momentum going.  Despite what some people say we match up well with spread teams this year.  Ty Zimmerman is a total stud and is elevating the entire defense right now.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: +2.5
« Reply #43 on: November 03, 2013, 06:51:46 PM »
our secondary isn't good enough to beat tech.

You're an idiot.

Please bet your life on dorian roberts.

If you bet a nickel on every fucktard Willie nillie negative thing you've stated about the cats on this board you'd be so goddamn far in the whole your bookie would have crippled you and turned your pockets inside out.  Think about that catzacker.  Think about that.  And if you're still sure, YOU go ahead and bet AGAINST Robrrts and the big 12's best scoring defense.




goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #44 on: November 03, 2013, 08:22:31 PM »
Betting the farm

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #45 on: November 03, 2013, 11:08:42 PM »
as much as i love this baylor team (which is a lot) we're the toughest opponent they've faced, and we had a legitimate shot to win that game late.  as we all learned last year, going undefeated is very hard.

i wouldn't be surprised if Baylor blows it against OU.  i sure hope they don't though.  -13 seems too much to me.

We are a better team than OU and I don't think Baylor has any trouble at all. They will win by about 30.

Please tell me what makes you think this. I think we have a good shot at beating OU but I don't think we are a better overall team.

Have you watched them play? What game have they looked impressive in? Is it their 16-7 win over WVU? Or maybe their 20-17 win over TCU? Baylor, Oklahoma State, and Kansas State are going to light OU up.

Have you watched us play? Our best win is against Louisiana Lafayette. No other team we've beaten is even going to make it to a bowl game. We have looked good the past two weekends but we have played two terrible teams. OU's wins against ND and Tech are way better than any wins we have.

OU's game Thursday and our game at Tech this weekend will be very telling about who is the better team, but right now I just don't see how you can say we are a better overall team than OU.

You could say it because we beat WV by a bunch more.    Also that we played UT closer and at their place.  Two common opponents, we looked better against both of them.  Not saying I would agree that we are better, but that's how you would say it.

We looked like crap against WVU too. We were behind the entire game until there were 2 minutes left in the third quarter.

I know you didn't say we are better but I think some people are fogetting that OU is 7-1 and ranked 10th in the BCS. Again, we have a good chance of beating OU, but to say we are a better team right now is dumb.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #46 on: November 04, 2013, 08:28:09 AM »
as much as i love this baylor team (which is a lot) we're the toughest opponent they've faced, and we had a legitimate shot to win that game late.  as we all learned last year, going undefeated is very hard.

i wouldn't be surprised if Baylor blows it against OU.  i sure hope they don't though.  -13 seems too much to me.

We are a better team than OU and I don't think Baylor has any trouble at all. They will win by about 30.

Please tell me what makes you think this. I think we have a good shot at beating OU but I don't think we are a better overall team.

Have you watched them play? What game have they looked impressive in? Is it their 16-7 win over WVU? Or maybe their 20-17 win over TCU? Baylor, Oklahoma State, and Kansas State are going to light OU up.

Have you watched us play? Our best win is against Louisiana Lafayette. No other team we've beaten is even going to make it to a bowl game. We have looked good the past two weekends but we have played two terrible teams. OU's wins against ND and Tech are way better than any wins we have.

OU's game Thursday and our game at Tech this weekend will be very telling about who is the better team, but right now I just don't see how you can say we are a better overall team than OU.

You could say it because we beat WV by a bunch more.    Also that we played UT closer and at their place.  Two common opponents, we looked better against both of them.  Not saying I would agree that we are better, but that's how you would say it.

We looked like crap against WVU too. We were behind the entire game until there were 2 minutes left in the third quarter.

I know you didn't say we are better but I think some people are fogetting that OU is 7-1 and ranked 10th in the BCS. Again, we have a good chance of beating OU, but to say we are a better team right now is dumb.

It's not dumb at all. They suck and we are going to finish ahead of them in the Big 12 standings.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: +2.5
« Reply #47 on: November 04, 2013, 08:45:41 AM »
our secondary isn't good enough to beat tech.

You're an idiot.

Please bet your life on dorian roberts.

If you bet a nickel on every fucktard Willie nillie negative thing you've stated about the cats on this board you'd be so goddamn far in the whole your bookie would have crippled you and turned your pockets inside out.  Think about that catzacker.  Think about that.  And if you're still sure, YOU go ahead and bet AGAINST Robrrts and the big 12's best scoring defense.

yeah, my baylor thing last year was awful - so was the texas game.  just because i don't pump sunshine and want to explore the other side of any argument/debate/game, that makes me negative.  Our Pass Def Eff is 7th in the conf (just above KU).

but enjoy the circle jerk.


Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11043
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #48 on: November 04, 2013, 08:46:51 AM »
Bet all the farms 45-16
This. We are going to scheme their faces off.

 :billdance: :billdance: :billdance:

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13508
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: +2.5
« Reply #49 on: November 04, 2013, 08:48:52 AM »
if the D is able to win on third down the majority of the time I think we will win but this game is a big coin flip