Author Topic: We look better than I thought we would  (Read 32486 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hatingfrancisco

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4518
    • View Profile
    • Tweet Tweet
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #75 on: November 04, 2013, 10:45:25 AM »
You mean Marcus Foster the shooting guard?

Angel was a true point?

He was there by necessity, thanks to Frank's woeful recruiting.

LOL at anyone thinking Angel was anything but a PG.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59282
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #76 on: November 04, 2013, 10:47:44 AM »
Omari, Shane, Nino and Will:  10 for 33   (Thanks Nino!)


That's why I said "Angel was a True Point?"


Man, what a rebuilding job that's going to have to be done after Frank, it's really worse than I thought.





Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42601
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #77 on: November 04, 2013, 10:48:36 AM »
:lol:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59282
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #78 on: November 04, 2013, 10:49:45 AM »
Will, Shane, and Omari:  Frank's leftover Clankinators

Sad


Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #79 on: November 04, 2013, 10:51:02 AM »
Angel was a true point?

He was there by necessity, thanks to Frank's woeful recruiting.

 :lol:
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42601
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #80 on: November 04, 2013, 10:51:40 AM »
:lol:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59282
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #81 on: November 04, 2013, 10:52:57 AM »
Look at the anger and denial spew forth from the haters.

I wonder if Frank bounced his "work up a conflict with Currie so I can bail" ideas off of anybody??  If so, who wouldn't have paid to overhear that.

Sad


Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42601
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #82 on: November 04, 2013, 10:54:32 AM »
:lol:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59282
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #83 on: November 04, 2013, 10:55:23 AM »
I win (as usual)


Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38018
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #84 on: November 04, 2013, 10:57:00 AM »
I always thought that Angel could make a pretty good stretch 3  :dunno:

Offline hatingfrancisco

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4518
    • View Profile
    • Tweet Tweet
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #85 on: November 04, 2013, 10:57:36 AM »

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #86 on: November 04, 2013, 10:58:34 AM »
I win (as usual)

it's been years and years since anyone else could guess what game you're playing.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42601
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #87 on: November 04, 2013, 11:09:00 AM »
:lol:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59282
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #88 on: November 04, 2013, 11:18:43 AM »
You can't even hope to contain me fellas.


Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38018
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #89 on: November 04, 2013, 11:24:22 AM »
You can't even hope to contain me fellas.

Certainly not with this new freedom of movement bullshit.

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10520
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #90 on: November 04, 2013, 11:39:16 AM »
Man, Dax really hated getting back doored.

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29362
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #91 on: November 04, 2013, 11:45:09 AM »
if one thing's for sure, dax hates frank with way more intensity than anyone here liked frank

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59282
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #92 on: November 04, 2013, 11:48:09 AM »
if one thing's for sure, dax hates frank with way more intensity than anyone here liked frank

I didn't hate Frank, friend.

Plus, give me a break, the Too Cool for School crowd falls in love with somebody because they think they're adorbs, or they like their twitter feed, or their tunnel dance, and they won't let it go no matter how $hitty that coach or player coaches or plays.

 


Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42601
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #93 on: November 04, 2013, 11:55:37 AM »
if one thing's for sure, dax hates frank with way more intensity than anyone here liked frank

I didn't hate Frank, friend.

Plus, give me a break, the Too Cool for School crowd falls in love with somebody because they think they're adorbs, or they like their twitter feed, or their tunnel dance, and they won't let it go no matter how $hitty that coach or player coaches or plays.

Dax has really honed in on what made for all the excitement around KSU hoops during the Frank era.  It'll probably continue against my hating ways because they're still doing a tunnel dance.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59282
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #94 on: November 04, 2013, 12:04:42 PM »
if one thing's for sure, dax hates frank with way more intensity than anyone here liked frank

I didn't hate Frank, friend.

Plus, give me a break, the Too Cool for School crowd falls in love with somebody because they think they're adorbs, or they like their twitter feed, or their tunnel dance, and they won't let it go no matter how $hitty that coach or player coaches or plays.

Dax has really honed in on what made for all the excitement around KSU hoops during the Frank era.  It'll probably continue against my hating ways because they're still doing a tunnel dance.

The "excitement" was waning, and that's why Frank bailed, he knew he had no where to go but down since his recruiting sucked and everybody in the region had the Full Monty on Frank being Frank.




Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #95 on: November 04, 2013, 12:05:27 PM »
the recruiting was decent under Frank, but the further we got away from the Hugs/Dalonte DC Assault era, the further recruiting declined.  We can all agree on this, at least. 

When Frank left, here's what we had:

Excellent:  Rodney
Very Good:  Angel
Above Avg:  JO
Avg:  Irving, Southwell, Gip
Below Avg: Omari, Nino
Terrible:  Spradling, Diaz 

We had Upshaw committed, but no help in the backcourt was anywhere in sight.  Let's call a spade a spade.  Things were going downhill fast.  And with the rules change, jfc... 
   

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #96 on: November 04, 2013, 12:06:46 PM »
If Frank took last year's team and finished 2nd or 3rd in the Conference and got us to the round of 32, would the "excitement" be any higher than it is right now? 

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38018
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #97 on: November 04, 2013, 12:12:48 PM »
LOL at ppl using the GRCOAT, one Huggs spent an off season outside of NCAA rules, and hiring an AAU coach for a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) high salaray, accumulating as the standard. 

Mike lost our connection to DC Assault and Frank was stuck with a large pipeline being shut off suddenly. 

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #98 on: November 04, 2013, 12:15:01 PM »
If Frank took last year's team and finished 2nd or 3rd in the Conference and got us to the round of 32, would the "excitement" be any higher than it is right now?

i don't know and i don't care.  these are the wrong questions. 

art's here, he's not here.  i don't care.  oscar's fate is his.  it has nothing to do with frank. just like frank's successes and failures at KSU were all his.

all the excuses already lined up for oscar are aburd. 

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16207
    • View Profile
Re: We look better than I thought we would
« Reply #99 on: November 04, 2013, 12:16:11 PM »
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.