Author Topic: Briles > Snyder (Read 232655 times)

Missouriscribe · « **Reply #975 on:** June 14, 2016, 04:55:56 PM »

that Stanford swimmer kid should be praying they don't fire Art

Kat Kid · « **Reply #976 on:** June 14, 2016, 10:57:55 PM »

I mean, we knew Jason King was human garbage, but the extent to which he is willing go full pro-Briles, pro-Baylor in the midst of this is still jarring.

https://twitter.com/JasonKingBR/status/742925987822768128

michigancat · « **Reply #977 on:** June 15, 2016, 07:44:12 AM »

Quote from: Kat Kid on June 14, 2016, 10:57:55 PM

I mean, we knew Jason King was human garbage, but the extent to which he is willing go full pro-Briles, pro-Baylor in the midst of this is still jarring.

https://twitter.com/JasonKingBR/status/742925987822768128

that's amazing

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #978 on:** June 15, 2016, 08:26:32 AM »

Baylor really should release the full report.

DQ12 · « **Reply #979 on:** June 15, 2016, 10:13:23 AM »

To be fair, I'd want to know what the evidence was too.

ChiComCat · « **Reply #980 on:** June 15, 2016, 12:01:18 PM »

I think they should release the report but there is no way Briles should be brought back.

There is absolutely no way the he didn't know about some of this and choose to do nothing. He accepted multiple players that have been in trouble in the past AND did not punish players on his team for the same conduct. That isn't giving players a second chance, that is blatantly putting students at risk for the benefit of the football team. If he was somehow miraculously ignorant to all of his athlete's conduct, he should be let go for gross incompetence to the extent of putting students at risk.

catastrophe · « **Reply #981 on:** June 15, 2016, 12:24:35 PM »

It's weird that Baylor fans think there would be even a shred of redeeming material in the report.

Katpappy · « **Reply #982 on:** June 15, 2016, 01:29:16 PM »

Quote from: catastrophe on June 15, 2016, 12:24:35 PM

It's weird that Baylor fans think there would be even a shred of redeeming material in the report.

It's not that hard. They want to keep the best coach Baylor has had in the 21st century.

SkinnyBenny · « **Reply #983 on:** June 18, 2016, 10:26:30 AM »

Briles and Baylor have reportedly reached a settlement. Guessing they paid him a shitload of money to sign a non-disclosure agreement.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #984 on:** June 18, 2016, 12:22:29 PM »

Quote from: ChiCat on June 15, 2016, 12:01:18 PM

I think they should release the report but there is no way Briles should be brought back.

There is absolutely no way the he didn't know about some of this and choose to do nothing. He accepted multiple players that have been in trouble in the past AND did not punish players on his team for the same conduct. That isn't giving players a second chance, that is blatantly putting students at risk for the benefit of the football team. If he was somehow miraculously ignorant to all of his athlete's conduct, he should be let go for gross incompetence to the extent of putting students at risk.

Briles is a master of denying stuff.

My son is roaming another team's sidelines stealing info? I am shocked!

This transfer is a dangerous sexual predator and his coach literally called me and told me? Well now, I do not remember that!

He will always be able to say he simply had no idea what his athletes were doing...I think the admin realized when it is so widespread that schtick was not going to fly

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #985 on:** July 31, 2016, 02:06:38 PM »

You would like to report an assault?

How about you get charged with a crime for your trouble

Missouriscribe · « **Reply #986 on:** July 31, 2016, 04:00:58 PM »

I didn't think it was possible, but it appears they really did use the angle of cool uniforms and no chance of being prosecuted for raping women to harvest talent and win games. I know it happened at places like Florida State, but this just appears so systemic and willful.

That_Guy · « **Reply #987 on:** July 31, 2016, 06:11:36 PM »

The NCAA has to come down on them, right?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

bucket · « **Reply #988 on:** July 31, 2016, 10:07:31 PM »

Quote

Baylor rape victims say the university told women who attempted to report their assaults that their parents would be informed of their alcohol or drug use under the student conduct code and in some circumstances were themselves charged with code violations, according to the Associated Press.

Baylor’s student code banned dancing until 1996 and only last year removed “fornication,” “adultery,” and “homosexual acts” from its official list of misconduct. Victims say Baylor even punished women who tried to report assaults that happened to other victims:

One woman said her case began when she called police to report a physical assault on another woman at an off-campus party. Police demanded to know if she was underage and had been drinking, then arrested and reported her to the school office that investigates conduct code violations, she said. She told Baylor officials her drinking was a result of being raped a month earlier and detailed what happened in person and in a letter.

She received an alcohol code violation and told to do 25 hours community service, and when she tried to appeal, the woman said Baylor officials urged her to drop it. The school never pursued her rape claim.

“I was told by many Baylor staff that they couldn’t do anything for me because my assault was off campus, yet they had no problem punishing me for my off-campus drinking,” the woman said.
Universities are required by federal law to investigate sexual assaults, whether they happen on- or off-campus, and feds informed Baylor in 2011 that its conduct policy may have a chilling effect on sexual assault reporting. Being caught drinking alcohol is cause for expulsion under Baylor’s student conduct policy.

Pepper Hamilton’s report cited the policy as “creating barriers” to victims reporting their assaults, due both to fears of being punished and those of parental informing.

http://deadspin.com/report-baylor-coerced-rape-victims-into-silence-by-thr-1784599815?utm_campaign=socialflow_deadspin_twitter&utm_source=deadspin_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow

scottwildcat · « **Reply #989 on:** July 31, 2016, 10:24:59 PM »

Quote from: That_Guy on July 31, 2016, 06:11:36 PM

The NCAA has to come down on them, right?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This most recent report has nothing to do with their athletic department, so, no they don't, and no they won't.

scottwildcat · « **Reply #990 on:** July 31, 2016, 10:27:12 PM »

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/bigten/2013/09/24/ncaa-reduction-in-penn-state-penalties-sends-broader-signal/2864567/

ednksu · « **Reply #991 on:** August 01, 2016, 09:57:33 PM »

The amount of institutional weight Baylor put on these women is exactly why they should be banned from all competition. Sorry for the student athletes who have made a career there and will be mumped over (although I would say they should get an unconditional release), but eff that school with every inch of a rusty flag poll.

bucket · « **Reply #992 on:** August 02, 2016, 08:53:51 PM »

Another player got arrested. Stalking and alleged physical abuse.

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #993 on:** August 03, 2016, 08:48:33 AM »

Case closed. Bill wins. Lock this rough rider up.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #994 on:** August 03, 2016, 10:16:12 AM »

Quote from: WackyCat08 on August 03, 2016, 08:48:33 AM

Case closed. Bill wins. Lock this rough rider up.

Also 'Stone was completely right about this, lock it.

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #995 on:** August 03, 2016, 11:35:25 AM »

Quote from: 'taterblast on July 21, 2015, 03:55:46 PM

deputy dawg · « **Reply #996 on:** August 03, 2016, 02:24:50 PM »

More bad news for Baylor, DA wanting access to the Pepper Hamilton report. He/she would only ask for it if they believe that it contained evidence of criminal conduct. That could be suspicion that there are uncharged athletes that have committed a criminal offense, or could be obstruction of justice on the part of Baylor employees.

http://www.espn.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/17208637/district-attorney-asks-baylor-bears-pepper-hamilton-investigation-access

Interesting that Baylor reportedly did not take possession of the report so that it would not be available via civil subpoena. DA will have problems getting it via court order due to attorney-client privilege. Looks crafty at the moment, but if the DA secures a copy, it will bolster an obstruction of justice case....

Pretty slimy move.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #997 on:** August 03, 2016, 02:43:46 PM »

Like hell they did not take possession of it...

deputy dawg · « **Reply #998 on:** August 03, 2016, 02:50:44 PM »

I doubt they did, they can look at it whenever they want--while in possession of their attorneys. Poor security over that report would be bad news, any copy not in possession of the attorneys is subject to subpoena or seizure via a search warrant. I'd guess they're smart enough to not risk having physical custody of the report--if they do and say the don't, you have another obstruction of justice and a perjury charge staring you in the face.

Kat Kid · « **Reply #999 on:** August 03, 2016, 02:56:22 PM »

Their president was Kenneth f'ing Starr, hey absolutely did everything possible to protect Baylor from any public scrutiny or consequences. Ken got a little dirt on him on the way out, but nothing criminal, heavens no!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk