Author Topic: hurt receivers question  (Read 4633 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
hurt receivers question
« on: October 08, 2013, 12:53:24 PM »
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2013, 12:54:58 PM »
because now we're forced to come out and play like a bunch of rabid dogs. or day i say...................WILDCATS.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47962
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2013, 12:55:17 PM »
dobermans


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38095
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2013, 12:56:26 PM »
I wouldn't be mad if I saw some faces being eaten off Sat. 

Just throwing that out there.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2013, 12:56:57 PM »
d instant office sams better be allowed to return kicks and punts if this strategy is going to be effective

Offline XocolateThundarr

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5298
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2013, 01:00:18 PM »
NOTHING TO LOSE!
@mikec2w

Offline ArchE_Cat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1097
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #6 on: October 08, 2013, 01:03:11 PM »
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #7 on: October 08, 2013, 01:04:27 PM »
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.
I agree but I wish TLBL had an ankle injury instead of a hamstring.

The part of this I hate the most is it appears the braintrust (Dimel, Miller & possibly SS) really made a mistake in evaluation how this team could function with the QBs at their disposal.  Also, I was really hoping the program was going to embrace the zig with the dual threat QB and power running game while the rest of the conference zags with the spread.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2013, 01:16:22 PM »
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

but we are adding water(s). to the sideline that is.  ;)

Offline Catchacold

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 733
  • Z28gY2F0cy4=
    • View Profile
    • wildcatgrowl.com
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #9 on: October 08, 2013, 01:31:48 PM »
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

to make the product "instant" it is "dehydrated".  :party:

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42628
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #10 on: October 08, 2013, 01:39:21 PM »
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

to make the product "instant" it is "dehydrated".  :party:

This is all about my water-boiling snag, isn't it?   :curse:

Offline ArchE_Cat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1097
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #11 on: October 08, 2013, 01:39:44 PM »
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

but we are adding water(s). to the sideline that is.  ;)

well played richard, well played  :gocho:

Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #12 on: October 08, 2013, 03:10:03 PM »
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

to make the product "instant" it is "dehydrated".  :party:

This is all about my water-boiling snag, isn't it?   :curse:

the world doesn't revolve around you, trim. it revolves around #life.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42628
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #13 on: October 08, 2013, 03:15:16 PM »
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

to make the product "instant" it is "dehydrated".  :party:

This is all about my water-boiling snag, isn't it?   :curse:

the world doesn't revolve around you, trim. it revolves around #life.

It weighed heavily on me.

Offline unleashthemob

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 601
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #14 on: October 08, 2013, 03:33:47 PM »
Kinda nullifies the return game with those two out...

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13508
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #15 on: October 08, 2013, 03:34:57 PM »
I hope that TLBL is back so Sams has someone to throw his long bombs too w/o fear of being picked off

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #16 on: October 08, 2013, 10:16:01 PM »
It was nice of TT86 to allow Torrell to borrow his devine gift of catch for one game.  Such a thoughtful group of youngsters we have.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9491
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #17 on: October 09, 2013, 12:43:43 PM »
It was nice of TT86 to allow Torrell to borrow his devine gift of catch for one game.  Such a thoughtful group of youngsters we have.
TT86 was just confirming how much he hated H2no

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #18 on: October 09, 2013, 01:18:56 PM »
Kellis Robinett ?@KellisRobinett 16m
LHC Bill Snyder: "We had 5 receivers on the field at one time last week and I'm not sure I knew all of them." http://www.kansas.com/2013/10/09/3048767/kansas-states-receiving-backups.html

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #19 on: October 09, 2013, 01:26:03 PM »
Plus, we play our players.

“With Tramaine and Tyler out you lose a lot of speed, but the profession we are in, college football, it’s about the next guy up,” Sexton said.


Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #20 on: October 09, 2013, 01:28:43 PM »
I've noticed that Bill's become quite the comedian in his postgame interviews.  must carry over from his in-game coaching. 


Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13508
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #21 on: October 09, 2013, 01:56:44 PM »
Kellis Robinett ?@KellisRobinett 16m
LHC Bill Snyder: "We had 5 receivers on the field at one time last week and I'm not sure I knew all of them." http://www.kansas.com/2013/10/09/3048767/kansas-states-receiving-backups.html
lol, that quote is gold

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53928
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #22 on: October 09, 2013, 01:59:59 PM »
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

to make the product "instant" it is "dehydrated".  :party:

This is all about my water-boiling snag, isn't it?   :curse:

It was the first thing I thought of

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #23 on: October 09, 2013, 02:09:10 PM »
Kellis Robinett ?@KellisRobinett 16m
LHC Bill Snyder: "We had 5 receivers on the field at one time last week and I'm not sure I knew all of them." http://www.kansas.com/2013/10/09/3048767/kansas-states-receiving-backups.html
dimentia

Offline TheFormerKCCat

  • DoD/Early 90s Era EMAWr
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 443
  • Loyal to a fault
    • View Profile
Re: hurt receivers question
« Reply #24 on: October 09, 2013, 02:14:54 PM »
LHC Bill Snyder: "We had 5 receivers on the field at one time last week and I'm not sure I knew all of them."
lol, that quote is gold
Oh Billy! That young jokester!  :lol:
I'm in it purely for the entertainment value.