Author Topic: USA Today Predicts the Big 12 in 2013-14 (Read 3554 times)

'taterblast · « **Reply #1 on:** October 03, 2013, 10:53:22 AM »

14-4

420seriouscat69 · « **Reply #2 on:** October 03, 2013, 11:00:23 AM »

Good grief. That's awful!

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #3 on:** October 03, 2013, 11:13:20 AM »

Quote from: emawblast on October 03, 2013, 10:53:22 AM

14-4

That was the 2012-13 record. You have to read the top of the column to know what the numbers are referencing.

'taterblast · « **Reply #4 on:** October 03, 2013, 11:14:32 AM »

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on October 03, 2013, 11:13:20 AM

Quote from: emawblast on October 03, 2013, 10:53:22 AM
14-4

That was the 2012-13 record. You have to read the top of the column to know what the numbers are referencing.

what a stupid rough ridin' list.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #5 on:** October 03, 2013, 11:15:10 AM »

Those are some awful predictos. I would say

1. Kansas
2. OSU
3. Baylor
4. ISU
5. WVU
6. OU
7. KSU
8. Tech
9. TCU
10. Texas

Trim · « **Reply #6 on:** October 03, 2013, 11:26:43 AM »

Why settle for 9th when 10th is available?

TownieCat · « **Reply #7 on:** October 03, 2013, 11:29:44 AM »

Quote from: Trim on October 03, 2013, 11:26:43 AM

Why settle for 9th when 10th is available?

Mixed-Nutz · « **Reply #8 on:** October 03, 2013, 11:33:04 AM »

Tourney Teams
1. OSU (By a Mile)
2. Kansas
3. Baylor (Will be a good tourney team)

NIT Teams
4. ISU
4. KSU
4. OU

Lolz
7. WVU
8. Texas
9. Tech
10.TCU

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #9 on:** October 03, 2013, 11:41:55 AM »

Do we really have an NIT team? I'm just not sure. I think ISU might be a tourney team.

_33 · « **Reply #10 on:** October 03, 2013, 11:45:05 AM »

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on October 03, 2013, 11:41:55 AM

Do we really have an NIT team? I'm just not sure. I think ISU might be a tourney team.

No, not a chance. Well maybe a small chance. Nope, sticking with my original comment. No chance.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #11 on:** October 03, 2013, 11:46:42 AM »

The NIT is for teams who had a legitimate shot at the NCAA tournament, but just didn't make it. If you don't think you have a shot at the tournament, you shouldn't count on the NIT, fwiw.

Mixed-Nutz · « **Reply #12 on:** October 03, 2013, 11:50:08 AM »

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on October 03, 2013, 11:46:42 AM

The NIT is for teams who had a legitimate shot at the NCAA tournament, but just didn't make it. If you don't think you have a shot at the tournament, you shouldn't count on the NIT, fwiw.

How many NCAA and NIT bids do you think the big 12 gets?

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #13 on:** October 03, 2013, 11:51:06 AM »

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on October 03, 2013, 11:50:08 AM

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on October 03, 2013, 11:46:42 AM
The NIT is for teams who had a legitimate shot at the NCAA tournament, but just didn't make it. If you don't think you have a shot at the tournament, you shouldn't count on the NIT, fwiw.
How many NCAA and NIT bids do you think the big 12 gets?

5 or 6. We probably get another couple of teams into the CBI.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #14 on:** October 03, 2013, 11:57:01 AM »

Looking at our schedule, I think we finish about 16-14. That would be good enough to be eligible for the NIT, but it would say a whole lot about how far the perception of our program has come since hiring Huggins if that gets us in.

Mixed-Nutz · « **Reply #15 on:** October 03, 2013, 12:03:38 PM »

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on October 03, 2013, 11:57:01 AM

Looking at our schedule, I think we finish about 16-14. That would be good enough to be eligible for the NIT, but it would say a whole lot about how far the perception of our program has come since hiring Huggins if that gets us in.

Have to beat Baylor once, we play them both times in the second half of the season.

TownieCat · « **Reply #16 on:** October 03, 2013, 12:24:11 PM »

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on October 03, 2013, 11:51:06 AM

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on October 03, 2013, 11:50:08 AM
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on October 03, 2013, 11:46:42 AM
The NIT is for teams who had a legitimate shot at the NCAA tournament, but just didn't make it. If you don't think you have a shot at the tournament, you shouldn't count on the NIT, fwiw.
How many NCAA and NIT bids do you think the big 12 gets?

5 or 6. We probably get another couple of teams into the CBI.

Texas is the only B12 school loser enough to play in the CBI.

pissclams · « **Reply #17 on:** October 03, 2013, 12:40:13 PM »

1) KU
2) OSU
3) Basyslor
4) UT
5) WVU
6) OU
7) ISU
8) KSU
9) TTU
10) TCU

MakeItRain · « **Reply #18 on:** October 03, 2013, 01:00:29 PM »

ISU are super pissed about this. Hoi whined to the media yesterday about how they are never respected.

steve dave · « **Reply #19 on:** October 03, 2013, 01:02:34 PM »

good grief jmart

steve dave · « **Reply #20 on:** October 03, 2013, 01:03:55 PM »

Quote from: pissclams on October 03, 2013, 12:40:13 PM

1) KU
2) OSU
3) Basyslor
4) UT
5) WVU
6) OU
7) ISU
8) KSU
9) TTU
10) TCU

this is also my list

mocat · « **Reply #21 on:** October 03, 2013, 01:11:09 PM »

i think the creator of that list accidentally switched ISU and TCU. if so, not a bad list

steve dave · « **Reply #22 on:** October 03, 2013, 01:19:37 PM »

I'm excited to watch the OSU v. KU games. Should be amazing.

OregonSmock · « **Reply #23 on:** October 03, 2013, 01:53:12 PM »

Why would anyone have Texas in the top five of the Big 12? They are going to suck balls and taint.

steve dave · « **Reply #24 on:** October 03, 2013, 02:02:58 PM »

Quote from: OregonSmock on October 03, 2013, 01:53:12 PM

Why would anyone have Texas in the top five of the Big 12? They are going to suck balls and taint.

well, the bottom half of the conference could be historically bad.