Beems listed "larger campus" as a reason KU maintains flagship status. I mean what in the eff does that have to do with anything?
MOVE OVER, UC-BOULDER! USAFA HAS 18,000 ACRES!
Campus size isn't any more arbitrary than undergraduate enrollment. Using your guys' logic, UC-Davis is more of a flagship than Stanford.
Stanford is private bruh.
Point still stands.
The point is true. However it was a terrible, terrible way of saying it, especially considering Cal - Berkley is actually the flagship of the UC System (and has a larger enrollment, to boot!)
The issue in the logic that you failed terribly to highlight is this:
KSU has more undergrads than KU
[missing premise]
------------------------
KSU is better than KU
The missing premise must be "if school A has more undergrads than school B, then school A is better than school B." Once you've shown that, it's pretty easy to see how that premise is flawed. But it doesn't matter, anyway, especially since this whole discussion is 99% trolling, because they know it pushes the buttons of many, many KU fans. The 1% that is homerism, well, what do you think you're going to do about that, anyway?