Author Topic: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball  (Read 4650 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« on: September 21, 2013, 09:00:37 PM »
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball? 


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline Lucas Scoopsalot

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2757
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2013, 09:01:40 PM »
ya eff that Jack guy
Luke's stock is rising as Winters continues to validate his greatness. Add Luke and Winters to my list! Also, EMAWBLAST! and Tobias!

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2013, 09:03:17 PM »
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline PIPE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1146
  • Always a pessimist
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2013, 09:04:06 PM »
 Who is jack?

Maybe SAMs sucks worse at passing that waters does at running.   :sdeek:
Awaiting the inevitable KITN

Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2013, 09:14:19 PM »
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.
Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline Bloodfart

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5663
  • I don't run out of gas.
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2013, 09:20:07 PM »
eff this crap put in sams and let it rip. 

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67448
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2013, 09:34:42 PM »
This is easily the most frustrating thing about the situation.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2013, 09:56:50 PM »
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.

I think you missed the point of this post.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline Lucas Scoopsalot

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2757
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2013, 10:19:36 PM »
I cannot believe Sams did not get to throw the ball this game. It is absolutely un - rough ridin'  believable
Luke's stock is rising as Winters continues to validate his greatness. Add Luke and Winters to my list! Also, EMAWBLAST! and Tobias!

Offline PandaXpanda

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1294
  • "is it too soon after 9/11 to be wearing pleats?"
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2013, 10:20:40 PM »
So weird.
aren't you glad it wasn't you? - g.h.

Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #10 on: September 21, 2013, 10:32:02 PM »
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.

I think you missed the point of this post.

When jack runs the ball it causes turn overs. 


eff ALL OF YOU JAKE WATERS FANS.  eff EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU IN THE ASS.
Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #11 on: September 21, 2013, 10:32:45 PM »
god he is rough ridin' worthless  :lol:

Offline IPA4Me

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7230
  • El Guapo
    • View Profile
    • Life Advice
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #12 on: September 21, 2013, 10:34:59 PM »
Jane Waters. Little bitch didn't even get hit on the fumble.

Offline 1001

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #13 on: September 21, 2013, 10:35:45 PM »
The UT D knows how to negate SAMS.

You guys show LOW FOOTBALL IQ.



Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #14 on: September 21, 2013, 10:35:55 PM »
Hey guys!   Lets run the wildcat!!!!   But Lets put the best running QB we've ever had who never throws so the other team knows exactly what we're going to rough ridin' do! 


Nope that doesn't work!   Lets put the QB in the game that rough ridin' chokes and can't convert 3rd downs or anything in the red zone.


YEAHHHH!!!!!!
Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2013, 10:36:24 PM »
The UT D knows how negate SAMS.

You guys how LOW FOOTBALL IQ.




Because Bill refuses to let him throw. Now go away and shut the eff up.

Offline IPA4Me

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7230
  • El Guapo
    • View Profile
    • Life Advice
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #16 on: September 21, 2013, 10:37:31 PM »
The UT D knows how negate SAMS.

You guys how LOW FOOTBALL IQ.
only because his senile coach sets him up to fail.

Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #17 on: September 21, 2013, 10:39:17 PM »
Jesus, the refs are giving us the game and we just keep sucking.
Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline Johnny Thunderbone

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 520
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #18 on: September 21, 2013, 10:42:25 PM »
Jack Winters for Heinzman.

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #19 on: September 21, 2013, 10:44:14 PM »
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.

I think you missed the point of this post.

When jack runs the ball it causes turn overs. 


eff ALL OF YOU JAKE WATERS FANS.  eff EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU IN THE ASS.

Not a Jake Waters fan, you're reading comprehension could still use some work. I really underestimated Jake's ability to put the ball on the turf though...woof.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2013, 10:54:20 PM »

Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.

I think you missed the point of this post.

When jack runs the ball it causes turn overs. 


eff ALL OF YOU JAKE WATERS FANS.  eff EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU IN THE ASS.

Not a Jake Waters fan, you're reading comprehension could still use some work. I really underestimated Jake's ability to put the ball on the turf though...woof.

eff you and your reading comprehension.  Waters creates turn overs.  He has more interceptions than Sams has pass attempts.  I don't need to read the end over your idiotic rebuttal where you agree Snyder is being a stubborn bitch if you can really make the argument that Sams "possibly" sucking at throwing "might" cause turnovers, so sticking with the human turnover, no third down converting, red zone choking rough ridin' pussy jake waters would be the better call.
Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #21 on: September 22, 2013, 12:19:01 AM »
I'll slow this down for you, because apparently I underestimated your stupidity. Jake bad. Sams good. Coach stubborn. Jake worse at holding ball than me thought. Stubborn coach may want to use head and redo thoughts.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #22 on: September 22, 2013, 12:29:00 AM »
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.

I think you missed the point of this post.

When jack runs the ball it causes turn overs. 


eff ALL OF YOU JAKE WATERS FANS.  eff EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU IN THE ASS.

Not a Jake Waters fan, you're reading comprehension could still use some work. I really underestimated Jake's ability to put the ball on the turf though...woof.

 :D

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #23 on: September 22, 2013, 12:31:29 AM »
Hey guys!   Lets run the wildcat!!!!   But Lets put the best running QB we've ever had who never throws so the other team knows exactly what we're going to rough ridin' do! 


Nope that doesn't work!   Lets put the QB in the game that rough ridin' chokes and can't convert 3rd downs or anything in the red zone.


YEAHHHH!!!!!!

This.

This is our offense.

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
« Reply #24 on: September 22, 2013, 02:06:11 AM »
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.

I think you missed the point of this post.

When jack runs the ball it causes turn overs. 


eff ALL OF YOU JAKE WATERS FANS.  eff EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU IN THE ASS.

Not a Jake Waters fan, you're reading comprehension could still use some work. I really underestimated Jake's ability to put the ball on the turf though...woof.

 :D

Damn, glass houses ya' know? Gets me every time.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang