Author Topic: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12  (Read 26127 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #150 on: September 17, 2013, 11:31:41 AM »
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell

Flip ku and floodaggie


Why would KU be behind a team that hasn't won a game yet?

Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5676
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #151 on: September 17, 2013, 12:05:06 PM »
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell

Flip ku and floodaggie


Why would KU be behind a team that hasn't won a game yet?

Because Flood Aggie has actually won 6 conference games since KU last won one.. Until they prove they can, no one should expect them to

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9491
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #152 on: September 17, 2013, 12:21:08 PM »
This is really going to suck when they run all over us in Lawrence.

Offline Havs

  • Taco Walk'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 3285
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #153 on: September 17, 2013, 01:35:05 PM »
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell

Flip ku and floodaggie


Why would KU be behind a team that hasn't won a game yet?

Because USD went 1-10 in FCS last year.

Why am I bothering arguing this??  :'bye cruel world:

Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4210
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #154 on: September 17, 2013, 05:03:28 PM »
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell

Flip ku and floodaggie


Why would KU be behind a team that hasn't won a game yet?
Start with a coach that actually seems to care.  Pro tip:  It's not Chaz

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #155 on: September 17, 2013, 05:23:15 PM »
1. OSU
2. BU
3. TTU
4. KSU*
5. OU
6. TCU
7. UT*
8. WVU
9. ISU
10. KU

*KSU flips with UT if Sams doesn't get 80% or more of the snaps going forward.

Offline AST

  • nip nip weiner
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3383
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #156 on: September 17, 2013, 08:42:07 PM »

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #157 on: September 18, 2013, 02:07:14 AM »
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell

Flip ku and floodaggie


Why would KU be behind a team that hasn't won a game yet?

Because Flood Aggie has actually won 6 conference games since KU last won one.. Until they prove they can, no one should expect them to

Absurd. Using this logic shouldn't everyone have KSU or OSU 1st? I'm guessing like none of you have seen ISU play, Iowa pounded them. They have a fair number of fans who rightfully think they won't win a game this season.

Havs, UNI beat South Dakota by a whole 3 points last season, chill.

Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5676
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #158 on: September 18, 2013, 01:54:59 PM »
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma St.
4.  Texas Tech
5.  K-State
6.  TCU
7.  West Virginia
8.  Texas
9.  Kansas
10.  Iowa St.



Flip OU and OSU.


Ps. eff Blake Bell

Flip ku and floodaggie


Why would KU be behind a team that hasn't won a game yet?

Because Flood Aggie has actually won 6 conference games since KU last won one.. Until they prove they can, no one should expect them to

Absurd. Using this logic shouldn't everyone have KSU or OSU 1st? I'm guessing like none of you have seen ISU play, Iowa pounded them. They have a fair number of fans who rightfully think they won't win a game this season.

Havs, UNI beat South Dakota by a whole 3 points last season, chill.

Since KU last won a conference game:
1. OU = 18 + 1 Big 12 Champ game win
2. K-State = 15
3. OSU = 14
4. Baylor = 10
5. Texas = 9
6. Tech = 7
7. ISU = 6
8. KU = 0

For this year, switch Baylor/K-State and Texas/Tech with TCU between and WV behind. 1-3 seem like they're the top, 4-6 in the middle, then Texas and 8-10 at the bottom.

1-3. OU, OSU, Baylor
4. K-State complete homer pick hoping S4ms saves us
5. Tech
6. TCU
7. Texas
8. WV
9. ISU
10. KU

*Edit: Texas has 9 wins, not sure why I put 10
« Last Edit: September 18, 2013, 02:08:38 PM by Shooter Jones »

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #159 on: September 18, 2013, 06:20:28 PM »
so

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #160 on: September 18, 2013, 07:08:39 PM »
I think ISU will beat KU this year, but only because it's in Ames.  And I think it'll be close.  If it was Lawrence, I'd have KU by 10+. 

That said, ISU is the worst team in the conference.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #161 on: September 26, 2013, 08:18:00 PM »
iowa state looks terrible, maybe tulsa is great? 


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline meow meow

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11394
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #162 on: September 26, 2013, 08:28:32 PM »
iowa state looks terrible, maybe tulsa is great?

Tulsas press box is three times bigger than flood aggie, maybe eight times

Offline meow meow

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11394
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #163 on: September 26, 2013, 08:32:26 PM »
Lmao Cody green

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #164 on: September 26, 2013, 08:34:30 PM »
1.  Baylor
2.  Oklahoma
3.  Oklahoma State
4.  Texas Tech
5.  Texas
6.  TCU
7.  K-State
8.  Kansas
9.  West Virginia
10.  Iowa St.

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #165 on: September 26, 2013, 08:36:12 PM »
Lmao Cody green

has he really fumbled 4 times already?
everyone is jealous

Offline meow meow

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11394
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #166 on: September 26, 2013, 08:52:54 PM »
Lmao Cody green

has he really fumbled 4 times already?

Not sure just tuned in and on his first play he drops back to pass and the ball falls out of his hand on his way back to throw.  Flood aggie should be winning easily, but they arent

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #167 on: September 26, 2013, 09:11:16 PM »
ISU up 28-14 under 2 to go in the 3rd



Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline pvegs

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #168 on: September 28, 2013, 12:55:49 PM »
Just unspeakably bad.  We are the new ACC.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #169 on: September 28, 2013, 12:56:56 PM »
The impending big 10 invite can't come soon enough.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67448
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #170 on: September 28, 2013, 06:52:26 PM »
The impending big 10 invite can't come soon enough.

keep waiting.   :impatient:  <----- beems.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #171 on: September 28, 2013, 07:07:57 PM »
Two things:

First, I expect us to lose to WVU.  That D will shut us completely down, and we can't stop D2 teams on D.

Second, I believe that KU is a legit candidate for the Big 10. But, it's years off.  It will hurt KSU fans more later, because KSU will be terrible at both football and basketball at that time.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #172 on: September 28, 2013, 07:10:39 PM »
Two things:

First, I expect us to lose to WVU.  That D will shut us completely down, and we can't stop D2 teams on D.

Second, I believe that KU is a legit candidate for the Big 10. But, it's years off.  It will hurt KSU fans more later, because KSU will be terrible at both football and basketball at that time.

i doubt they'll take ku.  they didn't even want mizzou (who draws a lot more tv sets).  i know they took NU, but that was and still is a headscratcher.

Offline Mr Bread

  • We Gave You Bruce
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 7867
  • I've distressing news.
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #173 on: September 28, 2013, 07:13:13 PM »
Two things:

First, I expect us to lose to WVU.  That D will shut us completely down, and we can't stop D2 teams on D.

Second, I believe that KU is a legit candidate for the Big 10. But, it's years off.  It will hurt KSU fans more later, because KSU will be terrible at both football and basketball at that time.

I don't buy KU as a legitimate big 10 candidate at all.  They don't need or even care about KU's basketball and they bring absolutely nothing else to the table. 
My prescience is fully engorged.  It throbs with righteous accuracy.  I am sated.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Rank The New Dogshit Big 12
« Reply #174 on: September 28, 2013, 07:15:01 PM »
Two things:

First, I expect us to lose to WVU.  That D will shut us completely down, and we can't stop D2 teams on D.

Second, I believe that KU is a legit candidate for the Big 10. But, it's years off.  It will hurt KSU fans more later, because KSU will be terrible at both football and basketball at that time.

i doubt they'll take ku.  they didn't even want mizzou (who draws a lot more tv sets).  i know they took NU, but that was and still is a headscratcher.

I think that the Big 10 is working to create a "balanced scorecard."

Each school they have grabbed has at least one great feature.  Now, NU may (probably) prove to be a huge mistake.

KU is a great add for them, if they want to bolster basketball.  That is the only reason to even consider KU.  They bring nothing else. 

If big 10 want to diversify across sports, KU is a great add.