0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: chum1 on September 05, 2013, 05:56:15 PMSo, I haven't bothered to look at the schedule like I planned, but regardng 10 fewer wins: how does this happen? Our non con is pretty pud, I believe, so maybe 7 of those loses are to conference teams. That cuts our win total from last year in HALF and has us finishing probably 7th or 8th. That's the year after a first place finish. And you account for this with the loss of two starters and a role player? That's crazy.i'm not sure how many different ways you want to postulate the same thing. i think the group of players we have this year is a significantly (dramatically) worse than the group we had last year. you think the difference isn't that great. there's nothing more to the discussion.
So, I haven't bothered to look at the schedule like I planned, but regardng 10 fewer wins: how does this happen? Our non con is pretty pud, I believe, so maybe 7 of those loses are to conference teams. That cuts our win total from last year in HALF and has us finishing probably 7th or 8th. That's the year after a first place finish. And you account for this with the loss of two starters and a role player? That's crazy.
Quote from: sys on September 06, 2013, 08:45:46 AMQuote from: chum1 on September 05, 2013, 05:56:15 PMSo, I haven't bothered to look at the schedule like I planned, but regardng 10 fewer wins: how does this happen? Our non con is pretty pud, I believe, so maybe 7 of those loses are to conference teams. That cuts our win total from last year in HALF and has us finishing probably 7th or 8th. That's the year after a first place finish. And you account for this with the loss of two starters and a role player? That's crazy.i'm not sure how many different ways you want to postulate the same thing. i think the group of players we have this year is a significantly (dramatically) worse than the group we had last year. you think the difference isn't that great. there's nothing more to the discussion.I'm not talking about a particular team, am speaking generally, and have made several different points thay way.
Quote from: chum1 on September 06, 2013, 05:06:40 PMQuote from: sys on September 06, 2013, 08:45:46 AMQuote from: chum1 on September 05, 2013, 05:56:15 PMSo, I haven't bothered to look at the schedule like I planned, but regardng 10 fewer wins: how does this happen? Our non con is pretty pud, I believe, so maybe 7 of those loses are to conference teams. That cuts our win total from last year in HALF and has us finishing probably 7th or 8th. That's the year after a first place finish. And you account for this with the loss of two starters and a role player? That's crazy.i'm not sure how many different ways you want to postulate the same thing. i think the group of players we have this year is a significantly (dramatically) worse than the group we had last year. you think the difference isn't that great. there's nothing more to the discussion.I'm not talking about a particular team, am speaking generally, and have made several different points thay way.You've just been jerking yourself off mostly if not entirely. Points!
This team will be TCU bad.
Quote from: Gooch on September 06, 2013, 02:37:27 PMThis team will be TCU bad.No we won't. That being said TCU has one of the 10 best scorers in the conference in, Kyan Anderson. They will likely be really bad again although Anderson should be good for a couple of wins against K-State..