Author Topic: Not about the Quarterback play.  (Read 34990 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #125 on: August 31, 2013, 12:16:40 PM »
I have a vision of them both being on the field at the same time. It is glorious. And it's not coming out before conference play starts. I think it will happen.

But still...the defense.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #126 on: August 31, 2013, 12:17:36 PM »
As i've said before, it absolutely blows my mind that Hubert and Rose are 1 and 2 at running back on the depth chart.  That is completely unacceptable from a recruiting perspective.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #127 on: August 31, 2013, 12:18:55 PM »
I thing the obvious solution is to start Sams next game and see what happens. If he can chew up more yardage and convert more third downs with his speed, despite our shitty line play, then he's the answer. My preference (and i think Snyders) was to use him as a red zone QB, but if we don't have a running game with Hubert and Waters, were going to have to sacrifice some passing ability for more mobility.

Again though, the whole premise of this thread is that QB play is about 10 on the list of things that lost this game. Our defense rough ridin' sucks. Period. Sams might provide marginally more offense, but our crap D is going to make it very hard to win 6 games this year.
« Last Edit: August 31, 2013, 12:22:00 PM by K-S-U-Wildcats! »
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Lucas Scoopsalot

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2757
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #128 on: August 31, 2013, 12:20:47 PM »
The whole rough ridin' team sucks except for our wide receivers.
Luke's stock is rising as Winters continues to validate his greatness. Add Luke and Winters to my list! Also, EMAWBLAST! and Tobias!

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37977
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #129 on: August 31, 2013, 12:22:27 PM »
The whole rough ridin' team sucks except for our wide receivers.

Backup QB looked pretty good, too.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #130 on: August 31, 2013, 12:24:59 PM »
The whole rough ridin' team sucks except for our wide receivers.

JFC. Waters does not suck. He may not give us what we need without decent line play and RB, but he is a tremendous passer. Sams probably doesn't suck either.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20115
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #131 on: August 31, 2013, 12:29:10 PM »
Waters may not suck, but nothing I saw hinted that he was a tremendous passer. 

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88428
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #132 on: August 31, 2013, 12:30:17 PM »
Waters may not suck, but nothing I saw hinted that he was a tremendous passer.

yeah, he looked decent. doesn't seem to be a real quick thinker.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #133 on: August 31, 2013, 12:31:17 PM »
Waters may not suck, but nothing I saw hinted that he was a tremendous passer.

+1

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #134 on: August 31, 2013, 12:31:26 PM »
I thought Waters was exactly what was advertised.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37977
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #135 on: August 31, 2013, 12:32:04 PM »
I thought Waters was exactly what was advertised.

I thought he would go downfield more.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88428
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #136 on: August 31, 2013, 12:32:32 PM »
I thought Waters was exactly what was advertised.

well, a lot of people were advertising him as "a better runner than you think" which was not as advertised because he was worse than I thought. though I guess that's pretty subjective. He'd be great under Mike Leach. He's not so great under LHC Bill Snyder.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18050
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #137 on: August 31, 2013, 12:35:18 PM »
On the QB draw plays, Waters looked like he was about to pass from about the time the ball was snapped until it hit his hands.  Then he just jumped up and down for 2 seconds (what the eff was that) and then ran once the defense reacted.  What a joke

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88428
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #138 on: August 31, 2013, 12:36:30 PM »
he's good at kind of curling into a ball before getting hit to guard his soft underbelly too

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #139 on: August 31, 2013, 12:38:17 PM »
I thought Waters was exactly what was advertised.

well, a lot of people were advertising him as "a better runner than you think" which was not as advertised because he was worse than I thought. though I guess that's pretty subjective. He'd be great under Mike Leach. He's not so great under LHC Bill Snyder.

Well we're used to Collin, Freeman, Ell, and Bishop. He's not going to break a tackle, but he's not extremely slow. He is a Chad May/Paul Watson QB.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88428
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #140 on: August 31, 2013, 12:39:55 PM »
I thought Waters was exactly what was advertised.

well, a lot of people were advertising him as "a better runner than you think" which was not as advertised because he was worse than I thought. though I guess that's pretty subjective. He'd be great under Mike Leach. He's not so great under LHC Bill Snyder.

Well we're used to Collin, Freeman, Ell, and Bishop. He's not going to break a tackle, but he's not extremely slow. He is a Chad May/Paul Watson QB.

I have no idea who paul watson is but chad may was not a "better runner than I think". he was equally as poor a runner as all other exclusively pocket passing slow QBs.

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #141 on: August 31, 2013, 12:42:42 PM »
I thought Waters was exactly what was advertised.

well, a lot of people were advertising him as "a better runner than you think" which was not as advertised because he was worse than I thought. though I guess that's pretty subjective. He'd be great under Mike Leach. He's not so great under LHC Bill Snyder.

Well we're used to Collin, Freeman, Ell, and Bishop. He's not going to break a tackle, but he's not extremely slow. He is a Chad May/Paul Watson QB.

I have no idea who paul watson is but chad may was not a "better runner than I think". he was equally as poor a runner as all other exclusively pocket passing slow QBs.

Paul Watson:

Watch the whole thing. The end is the best part.
« Last Edit: August 31, 2013, 12:56:29 PM by Ira Hayes »

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #142 on: August 31, 2013, 12:45:41 PM »
he seemed to throw alot of passes low, maybe some of them were intentional. 
he missed an easy outlet pass to Hubert.
he doesn't have a real live arm.
he threw 2 picks.
is he any better of a thrower than a guy like seth doege?  i'm not so sure, and i wouldn't want seth doege as my starting QB.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16951
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #143 on: August 31, 2013, 12:54:43 PM »
all along i was scared that waters would start and we would call plays as if klein were still back there. and that's what happened. i think waters could be a pretty good qb in a spread system. if they're going to run the same ol stuff (which is fine), rough ridin' play sams.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88428
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #144 on: August 31, 2013, 12:55:55 PM »
all along i was scared that waters would start and we would call plays as if klein were still back there. and that's what happened. i think waters could be a pretty good qb in a spread system. if they're going to run the same ol stuff (which is fine), rough ridin' play sams.

yes. this is exactly what I'm saying.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #145 on: August 31, 2013, 12:58:49 PM »
all along i was scared that waters would start and we would call plays as if klein were still back there. and that's what happened. i think waters could be a pretty good qb in a spread system. if they're going to run the same ol stuff (which is fine), rough ridin' play sams.

we can't run the spread

Offline yoman

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1213
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #146 on: August 31, 2013, 01:06:14 PM »
If we are ignoring e thread title and are talking about QB play, Waters under threw about everyone in the second, besides the TLBL TD. If we are sticking to the title, holy rough ridin' crap our dline is rough ridin' awful. Like should be playing at Pitt State awful

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18050
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #147 on: August 31, 2013, 01:07:25 PM »
Mueller tho.  Really the star turd

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37977
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #148 on: August 31, 2013, 01:08:59 PM »
The D-Line looked like they could be a pretty good FCS unit until Britz got hurt, imo.

Offline yoman

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1213
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #149 on: August 31, 2013, 01:09:48 PM »
Mueller tho.  Really the star turd

Credit where credit is due. Mueller was the only one who looked like he should be on a d-1 roster. If he was a change of pace sub guy, I would love him.