Author Topic: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias  (Read 8098 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Trogdor

  • Hoodcat
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2985
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings
« Reply #25 on: August 01, 2013, 01:32:01 PM »
Pac 12 is going to be better this season. Oregon, Stanford, UCLA are all good. Oregon State and Arizona St will be ok.

Pretty meh on oregon this season
@Trogdor_gE

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Rankings
« Reply #26 on: August 01, 2013, 01:32:12 PM »
If there is a gripe it's putting 5 SEC teams in the top 10.  Self fulfilling  prophecy all year long.  They are not that good but will be ranked as though they are due to their scheduling. Alabama and A&M's conf schedules are embarassing.

Offline Trogdor

  • Hoodcat
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2985
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings
« Reply #27 on: August 01, 2013, 01:34:55 PM »
If there is a gripe it's putting 5 SEC teams in the top 10.  Self fulfilling  prophecy all year long.  They are not that good but will be ranked as though they are due to their scheduling. Alabama and A&M's conf schedules are embarassing.

Is this the year they  :flush:?
@Trogdor_gE

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings
« Reply #28 on: August 01, 2013, 01:35:38 PM »
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22787
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings
« Reply #29 on: August 01, 2013, 01:48:02 PM »
If there is a gripe it's putting 5 SEC teams in the top 10.  Self fulfilling  prophecy all year long.  They are not that good but will be ranked as though they are due to their scheduling. Alabama and A&M's conf schedules are embarassing.
Agreed, Zacker.  The winner of the Bama A&M game basically has a cakewalk to a number one ranking and a date with Georgia/Florida in the SEC championship game where the winner gets to go to the NC.

But wow, yeah, that tough SEC schedule.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings
« Reply #30 on: August 01, 2013, 01:51:14 PM »
is this the rankings thread for the year?

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22787
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings
« Reply #31 on: August 01, 2013, 01:51:52 PM »
is this the rankings thread for the year?
yeah. grab a drink. make yourself comfortable.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Rankings
« Reply #32 on: August 01, 2013, 01:59:43 PM »
If there is a gripe it's putting 5 SEC teams in the top 10.  Self fulfilling  prophecy all year long.  They are not that good but will be ranked as though they are due to their scheduling. Alabama and A&M's conf schedules are embarassing.
Agreed, Zacker.  The winner of the Bama A&M game basically has a cakewalk to a number one ranking and a date with Georgia/Florida in the SEC championship game where the winner gets to go to the NC.

But wow, yeah, that tough SEC schedule.

Alabama plays @A&M and LSU (a month and a half apart). 

A&M plays Alabama and @LSU (a month and a half apart). 

South Carolina plays @ UGA and Florida (at the beginning end of the season).

Florida plays @LSU, UGA (neutral), and @ an overrated So. Carolina (all two weeks apart from each other)

Georgia plays overrated So. Carolina, LSU, Florida (neutral).

 

Even if they split their “tough” games, they’ll still hang around the top 10.  If they lose both their tough games, they hang around the top 12.  For no other reason than they were (a) ranked high to begin with and (b) the remaining 8 teams in the SEC are horrible.

LSU on the other hand, has @UGA, Florida, @Alabama, and A&M.  they will have deserved it.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings
« Reply #33 on: August 01, 2013, 02:03:16 PM »
is this the rankings thread for the year?
yeah. grab a drink. make yourself comfortable.

sounds good,  :cheers:

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38095
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #34 on: August 01, 2013, 02:07:32 PM »
Would smash at least half that list.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #35 on: August 01, 2013, 02:13:54 PM »
K-State's defense this year is a pretty big question mark.  Otherwise, K-State would easily be top 25. 

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38095
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #36 on: August 01, 2013, 02:19:01 PM »
Even with a questionable D, our O is going to be unbelievable.  Would smash two thirds of that list.

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #37 on: August 01, 2013, 02:33:10 PM »
they do this every year with SEC teams. I already know what is going to happen, Alabama will lose at some point and drop to 3-5 range. then the teams ranked ahead of them will lose late in the season and Bama will wiggle their way into the title game again.
everyone is jealous

Offline eastcat

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2502
  • Labeled by children.
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #38 on: August 01, 2013, 02:37:44 PM »
Oregon won't be as good this year as last. Lost a lot on defense and Kelly called all plays/ran offense. New former OC hasn't done much of anything other than watch Kelly work his magic.

Offline Trogdor

  • Hoodcat
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2985
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #39 on: August 01, 2013, 02:51:33 PM »
This list sucks
@Trogdor_gE

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17856
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #40 on: August 01, 2013, 03:08:45 PM »
What was the SEC's record in bowl games last year?

Offline HerrSonntag

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3443
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #41 on: August 01, 2013, 03:12:26 PM »
Northwestern and Wiscy pre-season ranked?   :jerk:

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings
« Reply #42 on: August 01, 2013, 03:17:02 PM »
If there is a gripe it's putting 5 SEC teams in the top 10.  Self fulfilling  prophecy all year long.  They are not that good but will be ranked as though they are due to their scheduling. Alabama and A&M's conf schedules are embarassing.
Agreed, Zacker.  The winner of the Bama A&M game basically has a cakewalk to a number one ranking and a date with Georgia/Florida in the SEC championship game where the winner gets to go to the NC.

But wow, yeah, that tough SEC schedule.

Alabama plays @A&M and LSU (a month and a half apart).

A&M plays Alabama and @LSU (a month and a half apart).

South Carolina plays @ UGA and Florida (at the beginning end of the season).

Florida plays @LSU, UGA (neutral), and @ an overrated So. Carolina (all two weeks apart from each other)

Georgia plays overrated So. Carolina, LSU, Florida (neutral).

 

Even if they split their “tough” games, they’ll still hang around the top 10.  If they lose both their tough games, they hang around the top 12.  For no other reason than they were (a) ranked high to begin with and (b) the remaining 8 teams in the SEC are horrible.

LSU on the other hand, has @UGA, Florida, @Alabama, and A&M.  they will have deserved it.
I am positive the SEC conference run analytics on schedules to give their elite teams the best chance to play in the NCG.
Their schedules are designed to be easy and have stretches of puds to stay healthy.

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #43 on: August 01, 2013, 03:17:13 PM »
Northwestern and Wiscy pre-season ranked?   :jerk:

like I said, NW went 10-3 last year and they return alot. why shouldn't they be ranked?
everyone is jealous

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22787
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #44 on: August 01, 2013, 03:19:29 PM »
Northwestern and Wiscy pre-season ranked?   :jerk:
i have no beef with NW being ranked. 


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline Trogdor

  • Hoodcat
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2985
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #45 on: August 01, 2013, 03:19:52 PM »
Northwestern and Wiscy pre-season ranked?   :jerk:

Miami receiving votes  :jerk:
@Trogdor_gE

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings
« Reply #46 on: August 01, 2013, 03:21:02 PM »
If there is a gripe it's putting 5 SEC teams in the top 10.  Self fulfilling  prophecy all year long.  They are not that good but will be ranked as though they are due to their scheduling. Alabama and A&M's conf schedules are embarassing.
Agreed, Zacker.  The winner of the Bama A&M game basically has a cakewalk to a number one ranking and a date with Georgia/Florida in the SEC championship game where the winner gets to go to the NC.

But wow, yeah, that tough SEC schedule.

Alabama plays @A&M and LSU (a month and a half apart).

A&M plays Alabama and @LSU (a month and a half apart).

South Carolina plays @ UGA and Florida (at the beginning end of the season).

Florida plays @LSU, UGA (neutral), and @ an overrated So. Carolina (all two weeks apart from each other)

Georgia plays overrated So. Carolina, LSU, Florida (neutral).

 

Even if they split their “tough” games, they’ll still hang around the top 10.  If they lose both their tough games, they hang around the top 12.  For no other reason than they were (a) ranked high to begin with and (b) the remaining 8 teams in the SEC are horrible.

LSU on the other hand, has @UGA, Florida, @Alabama, and A&M.  they will have deserved it.
I am positive the SEC conference run analytics on schedules to give their elite teams the best chance to play in the NCG.
Their schedules are designed to be easy and have stretches of puds to stay healthy.

As they should, and as should every other major conference.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #47 on: August 01, 2013, 03:26:29 PM »
Hi, guys!  Is this the rankings thread or the chip on shoulder thread?  I didn't check before I clicked on the link.

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #48 on: August 01, 2013, 03:26:37 PM »
where are we (opinions of the great minds here) going to be ranked by the media?

gonna say 21

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Rankings Thread ft. SEC bias
« Reply #49 on: August 01, 2013, 03:27:37 PM »
every rankings thread turns into a chip on the shoulder thread when kstate fans are involved