Rolling Stone Cover

[bubbles4ksu]

yeah eff it, seems like a good kid. time served. :gavel:

SEE THAT, MICHCAT!? THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.

[michigancat]

http://www.hipsterrunoff.com/2013/07/boston-bomber-cover-rolling-stone-false-flag-operation.html

[bubbles4ksu]

it bothers me to think that eventually part of the conversation about this eff will include something like, "too bad he turned into an bad person, cause he was sexy." that really, really bothers me. i think the cover plays a role in that conversation.

i'm a huge neocon when it comes to terrorist acts by ultraconservatives and muslims. i can't help it, i have visceral reaction to this stuff.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

I think he just looks too sexy. they should have used a picture of him now with his jacked up jaw and scars.

True but not nearly as sexy as this guy...

Damn, look at that hair.

[michigancat]

it bothers me to think that eventually part of the conversation about this eff will include something like, "too bad he turned into an bad person, cause he was sexy." that really, really bothers me. i think the cover plays a role in that conversation.

Have you heard or seen anyone say that?

[Rage Against the McKee]

It would be pretty great if this cover gets the kid life in prison instead of the death penalty.

[bubbles4ksu]

it bothers me to think that eventually part of the conversation about this eff will include something like, "too bad he turned into an bad person, cause he was sexy." that really, really bothers me. i think the cover plays a role in that conversation.

Have you heard or seen anyone say that?

i saw a gawker article with links to some tumblr pages that were pro-jahar and his cute face.

Edit: http://gawker.com/freejahar-when-conspiracy-theorists-and-one-direction-478152664

[steve dave]

bet he's got a rockin' bod

[Institutional Control]

it bothers me to think that eventually part of the conversation about this eff will include something like, "too bad he turned into an bad person, cause he was sexy." that really, really bothers me. i think the cover plays a role in that conversation.

Have you heard or seen anyone say that?

Does this count?

[bubbles4ksu]

it bothers me to think that eventually part of the conversation about this eff will include something like, "too bad he turned into an bad person, cause he was sexy." that really, really bothers me. i think the cover plays a role in that conversation.

Have you heard or seen anyone say that?

Does this count?

bubbles: 1 pt
krusty: 0 pts
women: -1 pt

[Rage Against the McKee]

This bomber guy needs to hurry up and use his Rolling Stone cover to find an impressionable wife so he can take advantage of conjugal visits in the future.

[EMAWmeister]

The RS editor tweeting "sheesh. maybe we should've drawn a dick on his face?" was pretty funny IMO.

[bubbles4ksu]

This bomber guy needs to hurry up and use his Rolling Stone cover to find an impressionable wife so he can take advantage of conjugal visits in the future.

<--- him and also to your dumb post

[Tobias]

i think bubbles might be mad

[michigancat]

The RS editor tweeting "sheesh. maybe we should've drawn a dick on his face?" was pretty funny IMO.

he has a good point. Should they just not talk about him?

[Headinjun]

 

I read it for the Matt Taibbi (stud) articles

 

[sonofdaxjones]

Welp, in seeing the Manson RS cover I am reminded that over-the-top hyperbole has been around for a long time.

Calling Charles Manson, "The Most Dangerous Man Alive" certainly must reside at or near the top of Hyperbole Mountain.

[bubbles4ksu]

i think bubbles might be mad

i'm frustrated that i don't have the words to explain why i feel that the cover stinks, which is probably a sign that i'm wrong. and i'm disappointed in those women setting women back by saying they'd date jahar and also in Nuts Kicked for saying something about conjugal visits.

that's about the same thing as being mad.

[OK_Cat]

i am not a fan of hypersensitive people. 

it's interesting to read what caused a seemingly "good" kid into doing something so awful.  it's important as a civilization to investigate things like that so that maybe next time someone will pick up some warning signs beforehand.   

i only read rolling stone when i fly somewhere.  great airplane reading material, imo.

[star seed 7]

i think bubbles might be mad

i'm frustrated that i don't have the words to explain why i feel that the cover stinks, which is probably a sign that i'm wrong. and i'm disappointed in those women setting women back by saying they'd date jahar and also in Nuts Kicked for saying something about conjugal visits.

that's about the same thing as being mad.

The cover is less offensive than you tying all women to the actions of a few.

[bubbles4ksu]

i am not a fan of hypersensitive people.

he killed some people and then he got a flattering cover photo. you don't have to be hypersensitive to not like that.

[OK_Cat]

i am not a fan of hypersensitive people.

he killed some people and then he got a flattering cover photo. you don't have to be hypersensitive to not like that.

don't be a bitch.  they used the picture because by all accounts he was a "normal" kid.  did you read the article, or just whine about him being on the cover?

[EMAWmeister]

i am not a fan of hypersensitive people.

he killed some people and then he got a flattering cover photo. you don't have to be hypersensitive to not like that.

don't be a bitch.  they used the picture because by all accounts he was a "normal" kid. 

eff that. No. Normal kids don't detonate bombs at sporting events.  Normal kids don't place a weapon that "shreds flesh, shatters bone and rips muscle" on the ground next to an 8 year old boy.

I don't have a problem with him being on the cover, but put up a mugshot, or at least something a little less jonas brothers-y.

[bubbles4ksu]

i think bubbles might be mad

i'm frustrated that i don't have the words to explain why i feel that the cover stinks, which is probably a sign that i'm wrong. and i'm disappointed in those women setting women back by saying they'd date jahar and also in Nuts Kicked for saying something about conjugal visits.

that's about the same thing as being mad.

The cover is less offensive than you tying all women to the actions of a few.

that's not what i said, at all.

[Rage Against the McKee]

Guys, the kid is going to spend the rest of his life in prison before getting murdered by the state. I don't see how it's that big of a deal if he gets his photo on the front page of a magazine. It's not like they are glorifying the action. They call him a monster right on the cover.