0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: CNS on June 27, 2013, 11:04:20 AMQuote from: sys on June 27, 2013, 10:46:32 AMQuote from: CNS on June 27, 2013, 10:36:39 AMTodd is simultaneously insane and interesting.i'd like it if someone could identify the basis for his egg thing. is he trying to reference monotremes? if not, what in the world gives rise to his thought process?I am not on that site anymore, but he used to say that every time he has to form an opinion on something, his very first thing he does is consult the Bible and his pastor/preacher/whatevs guy. So, I would guess the Bible says something about it that he interprets through his Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) glasses that makes such things reasonable.Age brings wisdom, the Bible is older than any human today. ARGUE OUT OF THAT ONE! CHECKMATE ATHEIST!
Quote from: sys on June 27, 2013, 10:46:32 AMQuote from: CNS on June 27, 2013, 10:36:39 AMTodd is simultaneously insane and interesting.i'd like it if someone could identify the basis for his egg thing. is he trying to reference monotremes? if not, what in the world gives rise to his thought process?I am not on that site anymore, but he used to say that every time he has to form an opinion on something, his very first thing he does is consult the Bible and his pastor/preacher/whatevs guy. So, I would guess the Bible says something about it that he interprets through his Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) glasses that makes such things reasonable.
Quote from: CNS on June 27, 2013, 10:36:39 AMTodd is simultaneously insane and interesting.i'd like it if someone could identify the basis for his egg thing. is he trying to reference monotremes? if not, what in the world gives rise to his thought process?
Todd is simultaneously insane and interesting.
I thought in the past Todd claimed he was Catholic. Am I wrong? The reason I bring that up is because the Catholic Church's official stance is that it has no problem with humans evolving from primates from a scientific standpoint.
I think this yoman guy is on to something....
Quote from: steve dave on June 26, 2013, 02:43:30 PMeff, I'm going to have to read this thing aren't I Summary of dinosaur section...Noah had baby dinosaurs on the ark. Duh. Putting adult dinosaurs on the ark would have been stupid.Dinosaurs walked with man. This is proven by many cultures having "dragon" myths.Todd doesn't believe dinosaurs breathed fire, because that would obviously be dumb.
eff, I'm going to have to read this thing aren't I
Did they give birth to live young and slowly (over millions of years of course) unknowingly begin to dissolve their young into goo and then encase them in a hard shell??(over millions of years)You see, I understand that the "it happened over millions of years" is the only real explanation that evolution has, I get that.? However, what SCIENCE says is that these unfathomable jumps from one biological process/trait to another have to basically happen INSTANTLY!! (meaning in a single generation by MULTIPLE organisms simultaneously)When chickens, for instance, decided to start laying eggs how lucky was it that a rooster "evolved" at the EXACT SAME TIME to be capable of fertilizing the hen that had decided to start producing eggs at the EXACT SAME TIME!!!!!? (Note:? "over millions of years" doesn't even begin to explain how this could happen)WOW!!!!!
it also affords a great opportunity to show via science how much faith in nonsense atheist must have.?
in the end, EMAW will always win.
Quote from: Panjandrum on June 26, 2013, 09:12:43 PMQuote from: steve dave on June 26, 2013, 02:43:30 PMeff, I'm going to have to read this thing aren't I Summary of dinosaur section...Noah had baby dinosaurs on the ark. Duh. Putting adult dinosaurs on the ark would have been stupid.Dinosaurs walked with man. This is proven by many cultures having "dragon" myths.Todd doesn't believe dinosaurs breathed fire, because that would obviously be dumb.He's really a treat. He believes there were "juvenile dinosaurs" on the ark, but he doesn't address why they aren't around anymore.
What happened to all that water from the flood?Also, this was too good:Quote it also affords a great opportunity to show via science how much faith in nonsense atheist must have.?
I remember asking him some questions about what it was that he doubted about the Bible and his biggest thing was that "it was written by a few men with a certain agenda".? I (more likely God spoke through me) responded without hesitation that so is every single text book.
Quote from: ChiCat on June 28, 2013, 04:58:09 PMWhat happened to all that water from the flood?Also, this was too good:Quote it also affords a great opportunity to show via science how much faith in nonsense atheist must have.?I will see that and raise you this:Quote from: Todd.?I remember asking him some questions about what it was that he doubted about the Bible and his biggest thing was that "it was written by a few men with a certain agenda".? I (more likely God spoke through me) responded without hesitation that so is every single text book.Bible validated. Todd: 1 Atheists: 0
What happened to all that water from the flood?
QuoteWhen chickens, for instance, decided to start laying eggs how lucky was it that a rooster "evolved" at the EXACT SAME TIME to be capable of fertilizing the hen that had decided to start producing eggs at the EXACT SAME TIME!!!!!? (Note:? "over millions of years" doesn't even begin to explain how this could happen)I appreciate that he characterizes it as a decision that chickens made at some point.
When chickens, for instance, decided to start laying eggs how lucky was it that a rooster "evolved" at the EXACT SAME TIME to be capable of fertilizing the hen that had decided to start producing eggs at the EXACT SAME TIME!!!!!? (Note:? "over millions of years" doesn't even begin to explain how this could happen)