0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Kim carnes should represent us
in the end, EMAW will always win.
Keep joking about the bilderberg's and shoving coke and mcdonalds and paying attention to your hippy hop kardashians, SHEEPLE.
ILLUMINATI ?@ILLUMlNATI 20mDon't treat people as bad as they are... treat them as good as you are. Retweeted by Chris Lowery
Retards
Ridiculous.
Quote from: kstatefreak42 on June 09, 2013, 09:38:08 AMRidiculous.I think this post, referring to us electing kim carnes as our representative for the bilderberg group, is my favorite ever.
Quote from: kstatefreak42 on June 09, 2013, 04:44:55 PMRetardsStuff like this really helps you get your message across imo.
Quote from: centraltexascat on June 09, 2013, 04:52:40 PMQuote from: kstatefreak42 on June 09, 2013, 04:44:55 PMRetardsStuff like this really helps you get your message across imo. Well if they are going to act Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) then i belive the name Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) suits them well. We cant have any serious open dialogue about the group ever. First we were all insane for thinking they existed.. now that alternative media has forced them into the public eye....But now we are all insane for covering them. I am sure we can all agree that a few dominant group of men cannot decide for all of human kind. This is why we have a republic so its THE WILL of the PEOPLE not some rich eff trying to make a buck. And the fact that MEMBERS do not talk about it and claim it doesnt exist should raise a red flag. I think openess and 100percent full transperancy is the only way to end this Bilderberg speculation. I think alot of you need to read Jim Tuckers book about the Group. He is the sole reason IMO that Bilderberg is even relevant to the public today. without his hardwork and dedication of over 30yrs of tracking and going to their meetings.. the guy is a sleuth! RIP
Quote from: kstatefreak42 on June 10, 2013, 12:46:17 PMQuote from: centraltexascat on June 09, 2013, 04:52:40 PMQuote from: kstatefreak42 on June 09, 2013, 04:44:55 PMRetardsStuff like this really helps you get your message across imo. Well if they are going to act Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) then i belive the name respect suits them well. We cant have any serious open dialogue about the group ever. First we were all insane for thinking they existed.. now that alternative media has forced them into the public eye....But now we are all insane for covering them. I am sure we can all agree that a few dominant group of men cannot decide for all of human kind. This is why we have a republic so its THE WILL of the PEOPLE not some rich eff trying to make a buck. And the fact that MEMBERS do not talk about it and claim it doesnt exist should raise a red flag. I think openess and 100percent full transperancy is the only way to end this Bilderberg speculation. I think alot of you need to read Jim Tuckers book about the Group. He is the sole reason IMO that Bilderberg is even relevant to the public today. without his hardwork and dedication of over 30yrs of tracking and going to their meetings.. the guy is a sleuth! RIPcan you link to Jim Tuckers book about the Group?
Quote from: centraltexascat on June 09, 2013, 04:52:40 PMQuote from: kstatefreak42 on June 09, 2013, 04:44:55 PMRetardsStuff like this really helps you get your message across imo. Well if they are going to act Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) then i belive the name respect suits them well. We cant have any serious open dialogue about the group ever. First we were all insane for thinking they existed.. now that alternative media has forced them into the public eye....But now we are all insane for covering them. I am sure we can all agree that a few dominant group of men cannot decide for all of human kind. This is why we have a republic so its THE WILL of the PEOPLE not some rich eff trying to make a buck. And the fact that MEMBERS do not talk about it and claim it doesnt exist should raise a red flag. I think openess and 100percent full transperancy is the only way to end this Bilderberg speculation. I think alot of you need to read Jim Tuckers book about the Group. He is the sole reason IMO that Bilderberg is even relevant to the public today. without his hardwork and dedication of over 30yrs of tracking and going to their meetings.. the guy is a sleuth! RIP
http://gawker.com/bbc-interview-with-alex-jones-ends-with-host-calling-hi-512378130
Quote from: michigancat on June 10, 2013, 01:58:26 PMQuote from: kstatefreak42 on June 10, 2013, 12:46:17 PMQuote from: centraltexascat on June 09, 2013, 04:52:40 PMQuote from: kstatefreak42 on June 09, 2013, 04:44:55 PMRetardsStuff like this really helps you get your message across imo. Well if they are going to act Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) then i belive the name respect suits them well. We cant have any serious open dialogue about the group ever. First we were all insane for thinking they existed.. now that alternative media has forced them into the public eye....But now we are all insane for covering them. I am sure we can all agree that a few dominant group of men cannot decide for all of human kind. This is why we have a republic so its THE WILL of the PEOPLE not some rich eff trying to make a buck. And the fact that MEMBERS do not talk about it and claim it doesnt exist should raise a red flag. I think openess and 100percent full transperancy is the only way to end this Bilderberg speculation. I think alot of you need to read Jim Tuckers book about the Group. He is the sole reason IMO that Bilderberg is even relevant to the public today. without his hardwork and dedication of over 30yrs of tracking and going to their meetings.. the guy is a sleuth! RIPcan you link to Jim Tuckers book about the Group? are you that lazy to look it up for yourself?
Quote from: kstatefreak42 on June 10, 2013, 04:51:44 PMQuote from: michigancat on June 10, 2013, 01:58:26 PMQuote from: kstatefreak42 on June 10, 2013, 12:46:17 PMQuote from: centraltexascat on June 09, 2013, 04:52:40 PMQuote from: kstatefreak42 on June 09, 2013, 04:44:55 PMRetardsStuff like this really helps you get your message across imo. Well if they are going to act Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) then i belive the name respect suits them well. We cant have any serious open dialogue about the group ever. First we were all insane for thinking they existed.. now that alternative media has forced them into the public eye....But now we are all insane for covering them. I am sure we can all agree that a few dominant group of men cannot decide for all of human kind. This is why we have a republic so its THE WILL of the PEOPLE not some rich eff trying to make a buck. And the fact that MEMBERS do not talk about it and claim it doesnt exist should raise a red flag. I think openess and 100percent full transperancy is the only way to end this Bilderberg speculation. I think alot of you need to read Jim Tuckers book about the Group. He is the sole reason IMO that Bilderberg is even relevant to the public today. without his hardwork and dedication of over 30yrs of tracking and going to their meetings.. the guy is a sleuth! RIPcan you link to Jim Tuckers book about the Group? are you that lazy to look it up for yourself? yes
Please be just motivated enough to click on my link.