So what I've gathered from kutards and talk radio is that because the article says ku had nothing to do with this, they can't be punished.
We're supposed to believe that ku was the unknowing and fortunate benefactor of a lottery pick, steered to ku by an agent through unpermitted payments, and KU has no connection to this agent, he just drew there name out of a hat and said, "that's the perfect place to stash him for a year." No motive or remuneration?

I seriously didn't hear a single talking head bring this up. I mean, the notion that ku would be an ideal place to stash a lottery pick is foolish at best, given massage seff's track record.
When there's smoke. . .