Author Topic: The Future  (Read 59634 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46688
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #275 on: February 21, 2014, 12:27:39 PM »
Take it to the history thread you morons

that's great because i 3D printed the code to the history thread and uploaded it via the wifi dongle on the 3D printer to our server's database  (which I also 3D printed). 

this is the history thread dumbass


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36787
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #276 on: February 21, 2014, 12:34:36 PM »
I am glad this is the history thread since 'Clams is still using a dongle for wifi. 

Pfft.

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13260
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #277 on: February 21, 2014, 12:36:18 PM »
future y-l_a is going to come back in time and slap the crap out of michigancat

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53914
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #278 on: February 21, 2014, 12:40:36 PM »
future y-l_a is going to come back in time and slap the crap out of michigancat

gonna have to put in some overtime if you want to build a time machine, bud. :lol:

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46688
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #279 on: February 21, 2014, 01:12:43 PM »
I am glad this is the history thread since 'Clams is still using a dongle for wifi. 

Pfft.

the 3D printer was from 10 years ago, downgrade.  learn your role.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36787
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #280 on: February 21, 2014, 01:14:41 PM »
'Clams is mean in the past.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46688
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #281 on: February 21, 2014, 01:16:53 PM »
make fun of my dongle, you get the horns. sorry bub, #1Cat


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #282 on: March 05, 2014, 01:01:28 PM »

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #283 on: March 05, 2014, 01:06:14 PM »

Offline Trogdor

  • Hoodcat
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2985
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #284 on: March 05, 2014, 01:15:36 PM »


Are we more impressed with the board or the fact that tony hawk is like 80 and still skating
@Trogdor_gE

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21770
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #285 on: March 05, 2014, 01:23:23 PM »
Scuttlebutt is that it's viral marketing for the BttF shoes Nike is releasing next year.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53914
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #286 on: March 05, 2014, 01:23:37 PM »
:flush:

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #287 on: March 05, 2014, 01:42:01 PM »
heard about this last year and signed up for the beta test version. ive got a link if anyone wants it. says the board is $1,500. pm me.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #288 on: March 05, 2014, 01:43:15 PM »
heard about this last year and signed up for the beta test version. ive got a link if anyone wants it. says the board is $1,500. pm me.


Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17184
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #289 on: March 05, 2014, 01:52:14 PM »
Scuttlebutt is that it's viral marketing for the BttF shoes Nike is releasing next year.

I was wondering why someone would spend so much money on a fake video. This makes some sense, at least.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21770
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #290 on: March 05, 2014, 01:55:10 PM »
Yeah, couldn't have been cheap to reanimate the corpse of Christopher Lloyd.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21338
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #291 on: March 05, 2014, 04:03:31 PM »
my coworker thought this was real.

happens alot

but still

sometimes i get tired

of being the one

to tell everyone

nothing is real

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53914
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #292 on: March 05, 2014, 04:08:21 PM »
my coworker thought this was real.

happens alot

but still

sometimes i get tired

of being the one

to tell everyone

nothing is real

I bet

Offline The Whale

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 975
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #293 on: March 09, 2014, 12:34:21 PM »
Once this gets big, there'll be a lot more books read for the book thread.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2454703,00.asp

Offline TheCatFanSpeaks

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 504
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #294 on: March 09, 2014, 05:15:15 PM »
That is cool as crap.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40568
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #295 on: March 10, 2014, 04:50:03 AM »
Quote
Philosophers and political writers have waxed on about the dawning of a new utopia since the beginning of history. Few, however, have had the guts, the hubris, or simply the fatigue-induced insouciance to stamp a date on it.

Today Morgan Stanley joins that few:

chart redacted

The chart above, released as a part of a note we covered earlier, shows that autonomous cars will deliver a Phase 4 utopia in just 20 years. We actually think Morgan Stanley is grossly underselling the technology. Here is how they define Phase 4:

    Autonomous capability: This is an “ideal” world akin to common science fiction in which all cars on the road have at least a Phase 3 level of autonomous capability (including retrofitting older cars), full V2V/V2X capability and the ability to drive from Point A to Point B with zero human intervention.

    Scenario: A family of four wants to travel from New York to Chicago. They have dinner at home, climb into the vehicle at 9pm, watch a movie projected on the windscreen, and then go to sleep in their fold-flat seats, waking up at their destination the next morning.

    Functions: Fully autonomous driving with no human intervention, with the focus likely to be on lifestyle/entertainment of occupants and manual car control as a back-up/supporting function (or disallowed). Cars will look very different from cars of today. Cars can also travel with no occupants. Remote control/disable functionality necessary.

Ideal worlds should be made of sexier stuff.

But let’s start with the bit we agree on: Cars can also travel with no occupants.

Sort of how after filming a movie or TV show, it can “also” be viewed later by someone else at a different location. Or how, in addition to running an operating system, computers can “also” run applications.

What we think this means is that the entire concept of a car as an appliance is replaced by cars as the physical backbone of a transportation network or cloud. Our family of four does not climb into “the vehicle”. They order transport from their home in New York to the destination in Chicago.

A vehicle is routed to their home. It belongs to a massive fleet of vehicles — our family happens to prefer gPort, though iGo is the marquee brand. Driven-cars today spend most of their time idle. Such low capacity usage means that the effective user costs of capital are high. In contrast, peak-time pricing, thick urban markets and smart dispatching ensure that the vehicle arriving to our family’s home is in nearly constant use or cleaning. Importantly, the battery inside of it is always, but always, being used or charged.

The savings from efficient capital use pile up quickly. Let’s say the average cost of a new car in the US is roughly $30k. A family with two cars is looking at a $60k capital outlay (ignoring the staggering of vehicle cohorts). A very generous estimate would put each car on the road for four hours a day. The other 20 hours — that ‘s 86% of the day — are spent rusting away in a driveway, parking lot, or garage.

Rather than owning 100% of a capital fleet that spends 14% of its time in operation, the family could effectively rent 14% of a vehicle’s usage from a retail transportation company whose fleet was in usage almost 100% of the time. For the very same user cost of capital, the family could ride in a $360K vehicle. Or, more practically given the trends in inequality, the costs of transportation would simply fall dramatically.

Now, 100% usage may seem crazy, but here is where we get to the real integration between electric vehicles and autonomous cars. The cost of the electric vehicle is all about the battery. Because autonomous cars can also travel with no occupants, they can be programmed to return unfailingly to the battery-switching station the moment their errands are over. The previous battery begins charging, and the cars are fitted with a new pack sized for the next appointment. Here again, smart dispatching allows battery packs to be pooled for cost-sensitive, long-haul commercial transportation and peak-pricing shifts scheduled so that retail customers never have to wait for an open battery.

This is a revolutionary new experience, no longer designed around the twin needs of the driver to effectively pilot the vehicle, and of the vehicle to be left idle until a driver is available. What we have now is a playground on wheels, one that is more expensive and likely more fun than most folks’ homes.

And this is just on the retail transportation side. The real action is commercial, where — freed from the cost of the driver — the fleet of delivery vehicles can easily expand six-fold; autonomous cars can be sent on cross-continent or even cross-globe errands; and tons of prefab materials can be massed at more remote locations — Williston Basin, North Dakota — well in advance of human arrival.

have to register to use the link.

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2014/02/25/1782472/are-we-there-yet-in-the-passenger-cabin-being-driven-autonomously-towards-utopia/
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline The1BigWillie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3172
  • Known to be a horrible person... (BORN 7/4/75)
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #296 on: March 10, 2014, 08:11:05 AM »
Quote
Philosophers and political writers have waxed on about the dawning of a new utopia since the beginning of history. Few, however, have had the guts, the hubris, or simply the fatigue-induced insouciance to stamp a date on it.

Today Morgan Stanley joins that few:

chart redacted

The chart above, released as a part of a note we covered earlier, shows that autonomous cars will deliver a Phase 4 utopia in just 20 years. We actually think Morgan Stanley is grossly underselling the technology. Here is how they define Phase 4:

    Autonomous capability: This is an “ideal” world akin to common science fiction in which all cars on the road have at least a Phase 3 level of autonomous capability (including retrofitting older cars), full V2V/V2X capability and the ability to drive from Point A to Point B with zero human intervention.

    Scenario: A family of four wants to travel from New York to Chicago. They have dinner at home, climb into the vehicle at 9pm, watch a movie projected on the windscreen, and then go to sleep in their fold-flat seats, waking up at their destination the next morning.

    Functions: Fully autonomous driving with no human intervention, with the focus likely to be on lifestyle/entertainment of occupants and manual car control as a back-up/supporting function (or disallowed). Cars will look very different from cars of today. Cars can also travel with no occupants. Remote control/disable functionality necessary.

Ideal worlds should be made of sexier stuff.

But let’s start with the bit we agree on: Cars can also travel with no occupants.

Sort of how after filming a movie or TV show, it can “also” be viewed later by someone else at a different location. Or how, in addition to running an operating system, computers can “also” run applications.

What we think this means is that the entire concept of a car as an appliance is replaced by cars as the physical backbone of a transportation network or cloud. Our family of four does not climb into “the vehicle”. They order transport from their home in New York to the destination in Chicago.

A vehicle is routed to their home. It belongs to a massive fleet of vehicles — our family happens to prefer gPort, though iGo is the marquee brand. Driven-cars today spend most of their time idle. Such low capacity usage means that the effective user costs of capital are high. In contrast, peak-time pricing, thick urban markets and smart dispatching ensure that the vehicle arriving to our family’s home is in nearly constant use or cleaning. Importantly, the battery inside of it is always, but always, being used or charged.

The savings from efficient capital use pile up quickly. Let’s say the average cost of a new car in the US is roughly $30k. A family with two cars is looking at a $60k capital outlay (ignoring the staggering of vehicle cohorts). A very generous estimate would put each car on the road for four hours a day. The other 20 hours — that ‘s 86% of the day — are spent rusting away in a driveway, parking lot, or garage.

Rather than owning 100% of a capital fleet that spends 14% of its time in operation, the family could effectively rent 14% of a vehicle’s usage from a retail transportation company whose fleet was in usage almost 100% of the time. For the very same user cost of capital, the family could ride in a $360K vehicle. Or, more practically given the trends in inequality, the costs of transportation would simply fall dramatically.

Now, 100% usage may seem crazy, but here is where we get to the real integration between electric vehicles and autonomous cars. The cost of the electric vehicle is all about the battery. Because autonomous cars can also travel with no occupants, they can be programmed to return unfailingly to the battery-switching station the moment their errands are over. The previous battery begins charging, and the cars are fitted with a new pack sized for the next appointment. Here again, smart dispatching allows battery packs to be pooled for cost-sensitive, long-haul commercial transportation and peak-pricing shifts scheduled so that retail customers never have to wait for an open battery.

This is a revolutionary new experience, no longer designed around the twin needs of the driver to effectively pilot the vehicle, and of the vehicle to be left idle until a driver is available. What we have now is a playground on wheels, one that is more expensive and likely more fun than most folks’ homes.

And this is just on the retail transportation side. The real action is commercial, where — freed from the cost of the driver — the fleet of delivery vehicles can easily expand six-fold; autonomous cars can be sent on cross-continent or even cross-globe errands; and tons of prefab materials can be massed at more remote locations — Williston Basin, North Dakota — well in advance of human arrival.

have to register to use the link.

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2014/02/25/1782472/are-we-there-yet-in-the-passenger-cabin-being-driven-autonomously-towards-utopia/

1.  Alcohol sales are going to quadruple.
2. Pregnancy rates are going to go up.
3. What happens if little lucy has to pee 8 times an hour?
4. Is the convenience store as we know it, dead in the future?  No QT?  :(
"That's what you get when you let some dude from Los Angles/Texas with the alias Mookfu raw dog it.  Willesgirl can back me up here.  There's a lesson in this.  You only get HIV once; make it count." - Mr. Bread

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53914
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #297 on: March 10, 2014, 10:10:25 AM »
Self driving cars will be amazing. Can't believe they didn't really mention the increased safety.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #298 on: March 10, 2014, 10:22:45 AM »
Self driving cars will be amazing. Can't believe they didn't really mention the increased safety.



 :ohno:

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46688
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Future
« Reply #299 on: March 10, 2014, 10:23:00 AM »
Quote
Philosophers and political writers have waxed on about the dawning of a new utopia since the beginning of history. Few, however, have had the guts, the hubris, or simply the fatigue-induced insouciance to stamp a date on it.

i'd like to punch this author


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.