Author Topic: Hypothetical Coaching Search  (Read 14861 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17146
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #25 on: March 24, 2013, 07:27:06 PM »
They really got insanely lucky with Self.

How did UNC not go after Self instead of Roy?

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #26 on: March 24, 2013, 07:27:56 PM »
They really got insanely lucky with Self.

How did UNC not go after Self instead of Roy?

are you serious?

Offline BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1409
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #27 on: March 24, 2013, 07:29:21 PM »
They really got insanely lucky with Self.

How did UNC not go after Self instead of Roy?

At the time, Roy was far more highly regarded.  Hell, if you asked a ku fan at that time if they wanted Roy or Bill, Roy would have won hands down.  Now ask the same question and nobody would trade.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17146
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #28 on: March 24, 2013, 07:33:37 PM »
They really got insanely lucky with Self.

How did UNC not go after Self instead of Roy?

are you serious?

Yes. I understand Williams was the safer hire, but Self had a much higher upside. Look at his resume up to that point. He was 35-13 at Illinois, with 2 Elite 8's and a sweet 16 under his belt.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #29 on: March 24, 2013, 07:37:55 PM »
They really got insanely lucky with Self.

How did UNC not go after Self instead of Roy?

are you serious?

Yes. I understand Williams was the safer hire, but Self had a much higher upside. Look at his resume up to that point. He was 35-13 at Illinois, with 2 Elite 8's and a sweet 16 under his belt.

higher upside? What? Roy has two titles. Harder for upside to really be any higher.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17146
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #30 on: March 24, 2013, 07:38:18 PM »
And not to mention he won the Big 10 regular season or Big 10 tournament every season he was at Illinois.

Offline BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1409
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #31 on: March 24, 2013, 07:39:47 PM »
They really got insanely lucky with Self.

How did UNC not go after Self instead of Roy?

are you serious?

Yes. I understand Williams was the safer hire, but Self had a much higher upside. Look at his resume up to that point. He was 35-13 at Illinois, with 2 Elite 8's and a sweet 16 under his belt.

Roy had played for multiple national titles.  The only "upside" Self had is his age. 

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17146
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #32 on: March 24, 2013, 07:46:12 PM »
I mean, retrospect is 20/20, but looking at their resumes up to that point I see more upside in Self's, and yes, age obviously being a factor. He won everywhere he went with consistency, never had a down year. Good grief, he took Oral Roberts from 6-21 to 21-7, and Tulsa from 19-12 to 32-5. Also, I didn't realize he was an assistant at KU in the 80's.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13574
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #33 on: March 24, 2013, 07:48:22 PM »
Stevens loses to a bunch of no names all the time. Smart is a much better coach.

He took Butler to two national championship games.  BUTLER.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #34 on: March 24, 2013, 07:51:15 PM »
Stevens loses to a bunch of no names all the time. Smart is a much better coach.

He took Butler to two national championship games.  BUTLER.

This. Not to mention dominating Smart hth.  If Smart was white nobody would think he's better than Stevens.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #35 on: March 24, 2013, 08:06:27 PM »
I like Sean Miller more than Stevens.

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7566
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #36 on: March 24, 2013, 10:02:25 PM »
They really got insanely lucky with Self.
pales  in  comparison to  the  good  fortune they  got  with Roy

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #37 on: March 24, 2013, 10:06:14 PM »
Stevens loses to a bunch of no names all the time. Smart is a much better coach.

He took Butler to two national championship games.  BUTLER.

This. Not to mention dominating Smart hth.  If Smart was white nobody would think he's better than Stevens.

smart dominated Stevens this year hth

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #38 on: March 24, 2013, 10:12:08 PM »
Stevens loses to a bunch of no names all the time. Smart is a much better coach.

He took Butler to two national championship games.  BUTLER.

This. Not to mention dominating Smart hth.  If Smart was white nobody would think he's better than Stevens.

smart dominated Stevens this year hth

F4 >>>>> some game


goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #39 on: March 24, 2013, 10:31:20 PM »
Izzo would get a serious look.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #40 on: March 24, 2013, 10:33:42 PM »
Stevens loses to a bunch of no names all the time. Smart is a much better coach.

He took Butler to two national championship games.  BUTLER.

This. Not to mention dominating Smart hth.  If Smart was white nobody would think he's better than Stevens.

smart dominated Stevens this year hth

F4 >>>>> some game




Yeah, but I don't think the results of one game is enough to justify the statement "If Smart was white nobody would think he's better than Stevens." Keep in mind I said in this thread that I would take Stevens over Smart.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #41 on: March 24, 2013, 10:35:56 PM »
Geno what's his name. UCONN guy

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #42 on: March 24, 2013, 10:38:24 PM »
Izzo would get a serious look.


man, he's only 58.  I'd really hate it if you got him.  That'd be two straight KU coaches that I couldn't possibly hate.  Hire Mike Anderson or something.

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7566
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #43 on: March 24, 2013, 10:41:17 PM »
I would put Buzz  at  the  top  of  my  list -  lack  of  high  major  experience for  Stevens  concerns  me  at a  Blue  Blood  like  Ku.  Tad's  recruiting  might  put him  above Turg,  which I  find  amusing.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #44 on: March 24, 2013, 10:44:50 PM »
Weber?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36688
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #45 on: March 24, 2013, 10:53:00 PM »
Izzo wouldn't go.   

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #46 on: March 24, 2013, 10:56:00 PM »
Izzo would get a serious look.

He would not leave MSU for KU.

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7566
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #47 on: March 24, 2013, 10:59:18 PM »
Hawks, is there somebody Bill would recommend?   His coaching tree doesn't have a guy that comes to mind.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #48 on: March 24, 2013, 10:59:50 PM »
there just aren't many good young coaches at the bcs level that you are pretty sure would succeed at Kansas. Buzz and Miller are about the only ones. Which kind of highlights how lucky they got with Self.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Hypothetical Coaching Search
« Reply #49 on: March 24, 2013, 11:04:19 PM »
Great thread.

You can take Smart and Miller off the list. KU boosters hate both of them (and the feeling is mutual w/ Smart).

Buzz Williams and Tad Boyle are the most logical suggestions so far, imo.

Maybe Stevens.