Author Topic: +350  (Read 3383 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
+350
« on: March 12, 2013, 01:48:55 PM »
Baylor +800   
Iowa State +800   
Kansas -200   
Kansas State +350   
Oklahoma +800   
Oklahoma State +450   
TCU +12500   
Texas +1200   
Texas Tech +12500   
West Virginia +4000   


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2013, 01:53:14 PM »
I take it that these are the odds to win the confy tourney?

If so, there's really good value on Okie Lite and ISU.
bears are fast...

Offline 3maw

  • lurk'r extrodinaire
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
  • #TeamAldi
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2013, 01:55:02 PM »
Baylor +800   
Iowa State +800   
Kansas -200   
Kansas State +350   
Oklahoma +800   
Oklahoma State +450   
TCU +12500   
Texas +1200   
Texas Tech +12500   
West Virginia +4000

real barn-burner between who's at the very bottom, christ aggie or dust(y hannahs) aggie. sheesh.

Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
Re: +350
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2013, 01:56:06 PM »
I take it that these are the odds to win the confy tourney?

mods, change his name to bookie idiot.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2013, 02:02:06 PM »
I almost want to put 5 down on TCU and TTU just because.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16962
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2013, 02:02:17 PM »
i would feel pretty okay with putting $50 on OSU

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2013, 02:02:31 PM »
I take it that these are the odds to win the confy tourney?

mods, change his name to bookie idiot.

I'm under the weather today...  :barf:

Don't be so mean.

 :cry:
bears are fast...

Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
Re: +350
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2013, 02:03:32 PM »
I'm under the weather today...  :barf:

Don't be so mean.

what a stupid phrase. "under the weather."

what does that even mean?

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16962
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2013, 02:05:44 PM »
I'm under the weather today...  :barf:

Don't be so mean.

what a stupid phrase. "under the weather."

what does that even mean?

Quote
The Phrase finder provides an explanation of the origin:

: To be under the weather is to be unwell. This comes again from a maritime source. In the old days, when a sailor was unwell, he was sent down below to help his recovery, under the deck and away from the weather.

... Here's a similar one I found: "Under the weather. To feel ill. Originally it meant to feel seasick or to be adversely affected by bad weather. The term is correctly 'under the weather bow' which is a gloomy prospect; the weather bow is the side upon which all the rotten weather is blowing." From "Salty Dog Talk: The Nautical Origins of Everyday Expressions" by Bill Beavis and Richard G. McCloskey (Sheridan House, Dobbs Ferry, N.Y., 1995. First published in Great Britain, 1983).
Another site states that something similar:

Passengers aboard ships become seasick most frequently during times of rough seas and bad weather. Seasickness is caused by the constant rocking motion of the ship. Sick passengers go below deck, which provides shelter from the weather, but just as importantly the sway is not as great below deck, low on the ship.
In both cases, we have two things in common. One, is its origin came from sea travel, when people felt ill due to several reasons, and the other thing in common, is that they both cited the fact that the persons feeling unwell went below deck.

Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
Re: +350
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2013, 02:06:00 PM »
kansas state looks like a good bet. you are getting a co-champion at +350 while the other co-champion is -200.

i mean, the teams are equal, right?  :dunno:

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38077
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2013, 02:06:44 PM »
Oh man...

Offline 3maw

  • lurk'r extrodinaire
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
  • #TeamAldi
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2013, 02:07:46 PM »
kansas state looks like a good bet. you are getting a co-champion at +350 while the other co-champion is -200.

i mean, the teams are equal, right?  :dunno:

i think that's how it works. we should ask our little bro though, since they're so good at sharing.

Offline SwiftCat

  • #LIFE
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
  • Depth Charge
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #12 on: March 12, 2013, 02:12:36 PM »
kansas state looks like a good bet. you are getting a co-champion at +350 while the other co-champion is -200.

i mean, the teams are equal, right?  :dunno:

YES! That is correct Rake! Thanks for pointing that out.

Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
Re: +350
« Reply #13 on: March 12, 2013, 02:14:33 PM »
hopefully steve dave enters this thread soon.

it's always best to consult him before making sports wagers.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2013, 02:19:45 PM »
I'm under the weather today...  :barf:

Don't be so mean.

what a stupid phrase. "under the weather."

what does that even mean?

Quote
The Phrase finder provides an explanation of the origin:

: To be under the weather is to be unwell. This comes again from a maritime source. In the old days, when a sailor was unwell, he was sent down below to help his recovery, under the deck and away from the weather.

... Here's a similar one I found: "Under the weather. To feel ill. Originally it meant to feel seasick or to be adversely affected by bad weather. The term is correctly 'under the weather bow' which is a gloomy prospect; the weather bow is the side upon which all the rotten weather is blowing." From "Salty Dog Talk: The Nautical Origins of Everyday Expressions" by Bill Beavis and Richard G. McCloskey (Sheridan House, Dobbs Ferry, N.Y., 1995. First published in Great Britain, 1983).
Another site states that something similar:

Passengers aboard ships become seasick most frequently during times of rough seas and bad weather. Seasickness is caused by the constant rocking motion of the ship. Sick passengers go below deck, which provides shelter from the weather, but just as importantly the sway is not as great below deck, low on the ship.
In both cases, we have two things in common. One, is its origin came from sea travel, when people felt ill due to several reasons, and the other thing in common, is that they both cited the fact that the persons feeling unwell went below deck.

Thanks, bruh.

 :cheers:
bears are fast...

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2013, 02:20:03 PM »
Anyone have any farms left to bet?  :kstategrad:

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2013, 02:21:12 PM »
Anyone have any farms left to bet?  :kstategrad:

Well I bet a farm we would win the Big 12 when we were getting +800 odds, so yeah, I have 8 farms.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2013, 02:23:41 PM »
Anyone have any farms left to bet?  :kstategrad:

Well I bet a farm we would win the Big 12 when we were getting +800 odds, so yeah, I have 8 farms.

Let it ride?  :dance:

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2013, 02:29:26 PM »
I want Baylor in the semis. How sweet would it be to go 6-0 vs Texas & Baylor? :love:

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38077
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2013, 02:58:47 PM »
As far as NCAA seeding goes, it would be better to get OSU and win, than to beat Baylor again.  Both for strength of opponent reasons, but also for righting a recent wrong/loss.


Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88560
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2013, 03:13:13 PM »
hopefully steve dave enters this thread soon.

it's always best to consult him before making sports wagers.

smart money is OSU +450

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88560
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2013, 03:14:51 PM »
Baylor +800 also isn't bad

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #22 on: March 12, 2013, 03:21:43 PM »
No team lower than 3 seed has ever won, FWIW.

Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
Re: +350
« Reply #23 on: March 12, 2013, 03:23:13 PM »
No team lower than 3 seed has ever won, FWIW.

i trust that sd has already taken this into account?  :crossfingers:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88560
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: +350
« Reply #24 on: March 12, 2013, 03:25:03 PM »
No team lower than 3 seed has ever won, FWIW.

i trust that sd has already taken this into account?  :crossfingers:

I stuck that info into the sd super computer that processes all my analytics for my bets (it's my brain, lol) and it told me that the big 12 has never been this sucky at the top. then it said YOLO.