Author Topic: to the monitor?  (Read 3923 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27692
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: to the monitor?
« Reply #25 on: March 10, 2013, 05:00:03 PM »
Pokes gonna poke. 


Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17876
    • View Profile
Re: to the monitor?
« Reply #26 on: March 10, 2013, 05:29:05 PM »
FSD is a sock, right?

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32548
    • View Profile
Re: to the monitor?
« Reply #27 on: March 10, 2013, 05:30:36 PM »
FSD is a sock, right?

 Laundromat says he's clean.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Re: to the monitor?
« Reply #28 on: March 10, 2013, 05:32:22 PM »
I thought they were fouls, but they hadn't been exactly calling that a foul until then. Just IMO.

we hadn't been trying to hedge with our arms before then, either. They were both just awful defensive plays.

Michituck, We hedged all game, you dolt.

Regardless of whether by definition they were "fouls" it doesn't explain away or justify the unbearably one-sided officiating on display yesterday.  Their star swung at our player without recourse, that is laughable.

goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55975
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: to the monitor?
« Reply #29 on: March 10, 2013, 05:36:03 PM »
I thought they were fouls, but they hadn't been exactly calling that a foul until then. Just IMO.

we hadn't been trying to hedge with our arms before then, either. They were both just awful defensive plays.

Michituck, We hedged all game, you dolt.

but not with our arms.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38108
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: to the monitor?
« Reply #30 on: March 10, 2013, 05:38:36 PM »
Still, they went to the monitor to look at Jurrick's rebound where he dropped his arm on Nino, but not something that looks like a legit uppercut btwn the only two players on that end of the court while waiting for an inbound with a ref 15' away.  I mean, they are the focus of the ref, the cameras, and the game as are any players at that point of an inbound, yet noting. 

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: to the monitor?
« Reply #31 on: March 10, 2013, 05:40:51 PM »
I thought they were fouls, but they hadn't been exactly calling that a foul until then. Just IMO.

we hadn't been trying to hedge with our arms before then, either. They were both just awful defensive plays.

Michituck, We hedged all game, you dolt.

but not with our arms.

:goetuck:

goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: to the monitor?
« Reply #32 on: March 10, 2013, 05:45:22 PM »
Still, they went to the monitor to look at Jurrick's rebound where he dropped his arm on Nino, but not something that looks like a legit uppercut btwn the only two players on that end of the court while waiting for an inbound with a ref 15' away.  I mean, they are the focus of the ref, the cameras, and the game as are any players at that point of an inbound, yet noting.
I

Doing something would have disrupted the predetermined outcome of the game too severely
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd