Author Topic: Sequester  (Read 3991 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Sequester
« on: March 04, 2013, 07:30:21 PM »
List the things your life is now missing as a result of the sequester.



(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38039
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2013, 10:44:54 PM »

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2013, 10:47:02 PM »
Higher ed research funding is going to be severely mumped by this. That indirectly impacts me. Otherwise, nothing.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32606
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2013, 11:10:18 PM »
Guys is the NBAF going to get cut off? Talk to me bros.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Sequester
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2013, 09:20:44 AM »
I suppose I'll miss being told about all the things I'm going to miss by our fear mongering propagandist in chief.  That was at least good comedy, in that it was so pathetic.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2013, 10:30:51 AM »
Higher ed research funding is going to be severely mumped by this. That indirectly impacts me. Otherwise, nothing.

Aren't the cuts across the board?  As in everyone is equally mumped?

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19151
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Sequester
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2013, 10:36:29 AM »
List the things your life is now missing as a result of the sequester.

nm
:adios:

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7834
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2013, 12:52:33 PM »
If this had been anybody's idea other than Obama, it would be the worst idea ever.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38039
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #8 on: March 05, 2013, 01:14:01 PM »
If this had been anybody's idea other than Obama, it would be the worst idea ever.

It's a pretty horrible way to operate, really.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Sequester
« Reply #9 on: March 05, 2013, 01:27:03 PM »
I suppose I'll miss being told about all the things I'm going to miss by our fear mongering propagandist in chief.  That was at least good comedy, in that it was so pathetic.

I've decided I don't actually miss this, so I'm back to nothing.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7834
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #10 on: March 05, 2013, 01:28:23 PM »
If this had been anybody's idea other than Obama, it would be the worst idea ever.

It's a pretty horrible way to operate, really.

True, and I can't come up with any reason for Obama to turn down the senates offer to let him choose how the cuts would be made, other than he doesn't want any more ties to it. Maybe he still plans to blame congress for it during the 2014 elections?

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38039
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2013, 01:31:21 PM »
Oh, Congress deserves their share of the blame, as well.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #12 on: March 05, 2013, 01:38:04 PM »
furloughs aren't scheduled to set in for another six weeks. there are a lot of dod employees that live in mhk and most are about ready to get paid 20 percent less than they currently make. that's potentially a pretty big deal to mhk whether some of you idiots realize it or not.

Offline felix rex

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8967
  • Knows what Brent did
    • View Profile
Sequester
« Reply #13 on: March 05, 2013, 01:43:01 PM »
In terms of my neck of the woods, this is not all bad. It is REALLY hard to cut dead weight around here. Gimme five years and lets reassess.
"How will I recruit to Manhattan? Well, distance. And the proud state of basketball. It start there, and then daily flights to Dallas, because I'm really good at going out. Like top five good. Ask my wife. She wants me to be happy."

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27702
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #14 on: March 05, 2013, 01:43:56 PM »
furloughs aren't scheduled to set in for another six weeks. there are a lot of dod employees that live in mhk and most are about ready to get paid 20 percent less than they currently make. that's potentially a pretty big deal to mhk whether some of you idiots realize it or not.

The private sector has been dealing with pay cuts since 2007. Its unfortunate.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #15 on: March 05, 2013, 01:51:33 PM »
furloughs aren't scheduled to set in for another six weeks. there are a lot of dod employees that live in mhk and most are about ready to get paid 20 percent less than they currently make. that's potentially a pretty big deal to mhk whether some of you idiots realize it or not.

The private sector has been dealing with pay cuts since 2007. Its unfortunate.

yes and if there was a private employer ten miles away from mhk that employed several hundred mhkers and it was about ready to start paying them all twenty percent less and stop hiring more of them as well as start releasing some of the ones that currently worked there then i would say that it would affect me because i live in mhk. not real hard to do the math on this one genius.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2013, 02:32:42 PM by rick daris »

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #16 on: March 05, 2013, 01:58:12 PM »
Government employees are for the most part pretty worthless and inefficient.  So consider me all pfffffft.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38039
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #17 on: March 05, 2013, 02:01:54 PM »
Government employees are for the most part pretty worthless and inefficient.  So consider me all pfffffft.

The same is true of private sector employees.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38039
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #18 on: March 05, 2013, 02:03:28 PM »
In terms of my neck of the woods, this is not all bad. It is REALLY hard to cut dead weight around here. Gimme five years and lets reassess.

Are you going to be allowed to cut the dead weight, or will you just have to pay everybody less money, effectively pushing your good employees to find better jobs?

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #19 on: March 05, 2013, 02:07:40 PM »
my aunt is going to lose her job. it is some sort of after school education program that is funded by nasa and the dod.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #20 on: March 05, 2013, 02:08:46 PM »
In terms of my neck of the woods, this is not all bad. It is REALLY hard to cut dead weight around here. Gimme five years and lets reassess.

Are you going to be allowed to cut the dead weight, or will you just have to pay everybody less money, effectively pushing your good employees to find better jobs?

The latter. The shitty people can't get another job and don't want to leave anyway. The good people don't like working with shitty people and don't like 20% pay cuts.

Offline felix rex

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8967
  • Knows what Brent did
    • View Profile
Sequester
« Reply #21 on: March 05, 2013, 02:24:34 PM »
In terms of my neck of the woods, this is not all bad. It is REALLY hard to cut dead weight around here. Gimme five years and lets reassess.

Are you going to be allowed to cut the dead weight, or will you just have to pay everybody less money, effectively pushing your good employees to find better jobs?

The latter. The shitty people can't get another job and don't want to leave anyway. The good people don't like working with shitty people and don't like 20% pay cuts.

Answer your own rough ridin' questions. I'm cutting dead weight and eff anyone who wants to object. Maybe I'll regret it, but you gotta make hay when the sun shines, right?
"How will I recruit to Manhattan? Well, distance. And the proud state of basketball. It start there, and then daily flights to Dallas, because I'm really good at going out. Like top five good. Ask my wife. She wants me to be happy."

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38039
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #22 on: March 05, 2013, 02:36:18 PM »
In terms of my neck of the woods, this is not all bad. It is REALLY hard to cut dead weight around here. Gimme five years and lets reassess.

Are you going to be allowed to cut the dead weight, or will you just have to pay everybody less money, effectively pushing your good employees to find better jobs?

The latter. The shitty people can't get another job and don't want to leave anyway. The good people don't like working with shitty people and don't like 20% pay cuts.

Answer your own rough ridin' questions. I'm cutting dead weight and eff anyone who wants to object. Maybe I'll regret it, but you gotta make hay when the sun shines, right?

That's good to hear. Are the people who are going the 20% cut route only doing that because they don't want to lay anybody off? Are some agencies allowed to turn cuts into layoffs while others are not? I don't completely understand how this works, so it's always good to hear from somebody who does.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #23 on: March 05, 2013, 03:19:04 PM »
Government employees are for the most part pretty worthless and inefficient.  So consider me all pfffffft.

The same is true of private sector employees.

Not in comparison, it's not. 

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38039
    • View Profile
Re: Sequester
« Reply #24 on: March 05, 2013, 03:21:51 PM »
Government employees are for the most part pretty worthless and inefficient.  So consider me all pfffffft.

The same is true of private sector employees.

Not in comparison, it's not.

In my experience, it pretty much is.