ErWINning formula (again); UT ADV

[CHONGS]

statistics are hard so most people discount them (because they don't understand them).  its understandable and human nature.

[Powercat Posse]

When u shoot 3-16 from 3pt, its nice to counter that wth 63.4% from 2pt (26-41).  Still adds up to 53.5 eFG

[CHONGS]

FYI  if we assume it follows a normal distribution:

mean = 36%
std dev =  9.3%

[attachment deleted by admin]

[kso_FAN]

I'm glad it came against Tech. Hopefully we don't have another one in us, but we could.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

FYI  if we assume it follows a normal distribution:

mean = 36%
std dev =  9.3%

Is this post the ttech game?  Michi said sigma was 6.8%.

Quite the outlier

[CHONGS]

post texas game, plus my std dev is for the model not the data (and michi said his was estimated).


ps the data (post UT game) is
mean:  36%
std dev:  9.4%

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

post texas game, plus my std dev is for the model not the data (and michi said his was estimated).

He estimated 6.8%

[CHONGS]

post texas game, plus my std dev is for the model not the data (and michi said his was estimated).

He estimated 6.8%

I dunno looks like he was wrong (probably didn't normalize quite correctly, should be divided by (n-1)).

[sys]

i didn't calculate or estimate anything, and i still got it completely right.  teamlazy&smart wins again.

[catzacker]

i didn't calculate or estimate anything, and i still got it completely right.  teamlazy&smart wins again.

Whatever.  It's like my Silver Lake coach used to say "Stats are for losers that never played the game".

[michigancat]

post texas game, plus my std dev is for the model not the data (and michi said his was estimated).

He estimated 6.8%

I dunno looks like he was wrong (probably didn't normalize quite correctly, should be divided by (n-1)).

I just took excel and made the end percentage of every game a data point. then used the excel functions. I'm not a pro, but the numbers seemed reasonable. And yes the 18.8% performance would skew the Std. Dev.

[michigancat]

post texas game, plus my std dev is for the model not the data (and michi said his was estimated).

He estimated 6.8%

I dunno looks like he was wrong (probably didn't normalize quite correctly, should be divided by (n-1)).

I just took excel and made the end percentage of every game a data point. then used the excel functions. I'm not a pro, but the numbers seemed reasonable. And yes the 18.8% performance would skew the Std. Dev.

still, it feels good to be right.