Author Topic: JO  (Read 16114 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ManBearPig

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 733
    • View Profile
JO
« on: February 10, 2013, 06:36:43 PM »
His performance was absolutely awful yesterday. We really need him to give some good minutes on defense tomorrow versus Withey....and catch a rough ridin' pass once in awhile. That was embarrassing.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
THE_ED'S STAYING ALIVE GAME CHAMPION

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38108
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2013, 06:39:38 PM »
Go easy. He was obvly blinded by the wonderful glory that is Shane

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2


Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38024
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2013, 06:44:05 PM »
I thought Shane's passes to JO were pretty bad.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38108
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Re: JO
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2013, 06:48:09 PM »
I thought Shane's passes to JO were pretty bad.

Don't clearly recall the first, but the second was a great one

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2


Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38024
    • View Profile
Re: Re: JO
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2013, 06:55:56 PM »
I thought Shane's passes to JO were pretty bad.

Don't clearly recall the first, but the second was a great one

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2

The first was way too high for JO to do anything with. The second pass was better, but I wouldn't call it great, either.

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2013, 07:26:55 PM »
they were awful passes

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45942
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #6 on: February 10, 2013, 07:27:13 PM »
His performance was absolutely awful yesterday. We really need him to give some good minutes on defense tomorrow versus Withey....and catch a rough ridin' pass once in awhile. That was embarrassing.

You couldn't have bumped the same thread from the last ISU game two weeks ago?

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16979
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2013, 09:21:01 PM »
i'm sticking to the "bad matchup" talking point

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #8 on: February 10, 2013, 09:30:30 PM »
they were horrible passes.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #9 on: February 10, 2013, 09:50:17 PM »
Is there a reason that this thread is pinned? Seems strange.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Re: JO
« Reply #10 on: February 10, 2013, 10:11:04 PM »
:adios:

Offline ManBearPig

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 733
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #11 on: February 10, 2013, 11:30:59 PM »
they were awful passes


they were horrible passes.

#TeamJO
Sorry, i guess everyone can't have the best hands in the state of Kansas
 :gocho:
THE_ED'S STAYING ALIVE GAME CHAMPION

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2013, 12:52:52 AM »
Just because someone used a bad example for why he thought JO was bad does not mean JO isn't still bad. He has regressed significantly.

Offline j-von

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1632
  • Hates The Band
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2013, 01:16:30 AM »
Is there a reason that this thread is pinned? Seems strange.

It's a mod conspiracy against JO.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #14 on: February 11, 2013, 01:31:08 AM »
He has regressed significantly.

look at _fan's chart.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45942
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2013, 01:38:03 AM »
He has regressed significantly.

look at _fan's chart.

The same rebuttal used when the morons brought this up last week. We have determined that it is in fact too difficult to even attempt to inform yourself before giving ones really stupid opinion. These people should just say "JO doesn't fit my expectation of what he should be so he's lazy, stupid, and a really shitty basketball player."

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Re: JO
« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2013, 01:45:36 AM »
He has regressed significantly.

look at _fan's chart.

The same rebuttal used when the morons brought this up last week. We have determined that it is in fact too difficult to even attempt to inform yourself before giving ones really stupid opinion. These people should just say "JO doesn't fit my expectation of what he should be so he's lazy, stupid, and a really shitty basketball player."

JO did have a few bad minutes against Iowa State. There were three possessions in a row that he looked bad on, whether it was his fault or the passer's. Then oscar decided he was done for the day, which i hate. Even though Gip played well, there is no reason for DJamer to be taking JO's minutes.
:adios:

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: Re: JO
« Reply #17 on: February 11, 2013, 02:38:48 AM »
He has regressed significantly.

look at _fan's chart.

The same rebuttal used when the morons brought this up last week. We have determined that it is in fact too difficult to even attempt to inform yourself before giving ones really stupid opinion. These people should just say "JO doesn't fit my expectation of what he should be so he's lazy, stupid, and a really shitty basketball player."

JO did have a few bad minutes against Iowa State. There were three possessions in a row that he looked bad on, whether it was his fault or the passer's. Then oscar decided he was done for the day, which i hate. Even though Gip played well, there is no reason for DJamer to be taking JO's minutes.

But DJamer can stay in front of quicker big men...said no one ever.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline wabash909

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6346
  • scattered all over like seeds in the wind
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2013, 08:08:19 AM »
I predict JO will play tonight and make a lot of weird faces and arm gestures.


Texas Christian University coach Gary Patterson has been hired as Kansas State's 34th football coach, multiple sources have confirmed to GoPowercat.com.  Patterson replaces Ron Prince, who was fired Wednesday. - Tim Fitzgerald   Nov, 7, 2008

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47974
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #19 on: February 11, 2013, 08:46:40 AM »
i bet  he picks his nose again on tv, oh man i will LOL so hard if he does that


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline PIPE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1146
  • Always a pessimist
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #20 on: February 11, 2013, 10:43:13 AM »
JO is frickin horrible.....
Awaiting the inevitable KITN

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Re: JO
« Reply #21 on: February 11, 2013, 10:44:47 AM »
JO is frickin horrible.....

You sir, are an idiot.
:adios:

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #22 on: February 11, 2013, 10:44:56 AM »
i bet  he picks his nose again on tv, oh man i will LOL so hard if he does that

best part is he felt the need to go on twitter and explain how it was an itch not a pick  :lol:

Offline "storm"nut

  • SOCK (outed by The Laundromat)
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #23 on: February 11, 2013, 10:45:59 AM »
As a declared bigot by MIR I find this thread racist and offensive.
RIP Fatty

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: JO
« Reply #24 on: February 11, 2013, 10:52:03 AM »
I hope JO can snap out of it and oscar can figure out some better ways to use him. The decision to play smaller with Shane at the 4 (which has worked wll) is the thing that has hurt JO the most. Gip has played well in oscar's system and as he's gotten better about not fouling, JO's minutes have dwindles, along with oscar being more willing to throw DJamer out there in spot duty. I like Gip's ability to post and score, but we've got a find a way to get JO's defense and rebounding on the floor. There are still plenty of games left for him to do so. No reason for him not to get 18-20 MPG and split with Gip at the 5 spot.