Author Topic: 2013 Season K-State Individual Player Per 100 Ratings (Read 15423 times)

WillieWatanabe · « **Reply #25 on:** January 17, 2013, 07:04:29 AM »

Quote from: Fedor on January 16, 2013, 02:55:37 PM

ha
Male to Female Ratio: 20.4:1

Most Time Online
WillieWatanabe 227d 8h 0m

YOU GOT SOMETHING TO SAY, FEDOR?!

kso_FAN · « **Reply #26 on:** January 17, 2013, 07:16:55 AM »

Quote from: Powercat Posse on January 16, 2013, 10:49:08 PM

I thought Angel played more than 21 minutes vs TCU but i dont think he played much in 2nd half. The bigs go 57 minutes tonight. Shane and Nino had foul trouble first half and Nino barely played 2nd half

JO had 10 boards in 24 minutes, but the other 3 only had 3 boards in 33 minutes. I did not like our effort on the def boards in the 2nd half

I don't think oscar liked how Angel played early and he took him out and put in Tay. When Angel came back in he played fine, but the game was over midway through the 2nd half.

After the bad start, we boarded really well the rest of the first and had a large rebounding margin going into half time. We seemed okay to start the 2nd, then down the stretch we mailed it in a bit on the boards.

I want our guys to give full effort for the game, but I can understand after seeing how bad TCU was that you would sort of coast a bit. They were just so terrible.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #27 on:** January 17, 2013, 08:14:21 AM »

kso_FAN · « **Reply #28 on:** January 17, 2013, 01:05:06 PM »

Comparison by category from last season to this season.

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #29 on:** January 17, 2013, 01:46:34 PM »

Nice to see=
1) the 3 guards and Rod all improved their asst per 100
2) basicly everyone is better with TOs
3) Counting OR and DR combined.... JO is 3.3 and Gip is 2.5 better, while Shane is 3.2 better on DR

kougar24 · « **Reply #30 on:** January 17, 2013, 02:01:42 PM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on January 17, 2013, 01:05:06 PM

Comparison by category from last season to this season.

The only significant improvement Will has made is DReb.

You could argue Assists, but I would counter with the fact that he improved the least in that category of any guard.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #31 on:** January 17, 2013, 02:05:43 PM »

Quote from: kougar24 on January 17, 2013, 02:01:42 PM

The only significant improvement Will has made is DReb.

You could argue Assists, but I would counter with the fact that he improved the least in that category of any guard.

Your obsession with Will is noted.

I was a probably most surprised by the improvements in oboarding by JO and Gip.

And the overall improvements in assists/TOs by all of the guards is significant.

Granted, it is very early and there are lots of games against good competition to bring those numbers down. Then again, we play Tech twice and TCU once more too.

DeoKat · « **Reply #32 on:** January 17, 2013, 02:10:27 PM »

Quote from: ben ji on January 16, 2013, 01:36:46 PM

OMARI!!! What a ballhawk

Yeah, that's nice, doesn't quite make up for being a turnover machine. Hopefully he can improve in that area.

kougar24 · « **Reply #33 on:** January 17, 2013, 02:23:20 PM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on January 17, 2013, 02:05:43 PM

Quote from: kougar24 on January 17, 2013, 02:01:42 PM
The only significant improvement Will has made is DReb.

You could argue Assists, but I would counter with the fact that he improved the least in that category of any guard.

Your obsession with Will is noted.

Am I wrong?

kso_FAN · « **Reply #34 on:** January 17, 2013, 02:28:12 PM »

Quote from: kougar24 on January 17, 2013, 02:23:20 PM

Am I wrong?

The point is we already have threads devoted to trashing Will, we don't need to muddy up more with more repetitiousness talking points about Will.

KsJoey · « **Reply #35 on:** January 17, 2013, 02:31:22 PM »

Nice job on the Stats. Good thing we got Michael Orris

pissclams · « **Reply #36 on:** January 17, 2013, 03:00:44 PM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on January 17, 2013, 01:05:06 PM

Comparison by category from last season to this season.

i am looking forward to seeing the 2012 stats (which include the full conference numbers) versus the 2013 stats after the season is over.

we see a lot of improvement year over year but we've been playing puds. unless you took a snapshot through 16 games of 2012 which i can't imagine you did.

kougar24 · « **Reply #37 on:** January 17, 2013, 04:08:19 PM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on January 17, 2013, 02:28:12 PM

Quote from: kougar24 on January 17, 2013, 02:23:20 PM
Am I wrong?

The point is we already have threads devoted to trashing Will, we don't need to muddy up more with more repetitiousness talking points about Will.

I disagree. You just posted these rankings which exhibit Will's crappiness yet again. So I feel compelled to comment on that conclusion from those stats.

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #38 on:** January 17, 2013, 04:22:56 PM »

Our Asst/TO ratio is 1.27. Best in the league and 33rd nationally

Past 2 years we have been .99 last year and .95 two yrs ago

Not only do we have a 1.27, but our opp only have a 0.65 ratio. That is good for 20th best in the nation

And yes we are still 4th in the nation in OR with 15.5 per game

nicname · « **Reply #39 on:** January 17, 2013, 04:24:15 PM »

Quote from: Powercat Posse on January 17, 2013, 04:22:56 PM

Our Asst/TO ratio is 1.27. Best in the league and 33rd nationally

Past 2 years we have been .99 last year and .95 two yrs ago

Not only do we have a 1.27, but our opp only have a 0.65 ratio. That is good for 20th best in the nation

And yes we are still 4th in the nation in OR with 15.5 per game

Wonder what the opponent's A/T ratio is as compared to years passed.

kougar24 · « **Reply #40 on:** January 17, 2013, 04:30:22 PM »

Quote from: Powercat Posse on January 17, 2013, 04:22:56 PM

Our Asst/TO ratio is 1.27. Best in the league and 33rd nationally

Past 2 years we have been .99 last year and .95 two yrs ago

Not only do we have a 1.27, but our opp only have a 0.65 ratio. That is good for 20th best in the nation

And yes we are still 4th in the nation in OR with 15.5 per game

Friendly reminder to consider our SOS currently when comparing to other teams and previous years.

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #41 on:** January 17, 2013, 04:32:46 PM »

Our opp A/TO ratio was 0.71in each of the last 2 seasons

We are +2.2 in TO/gm margain this year (+0.76 last yr, +1.26 two yrs ago)

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #42 on:** January 17, 2013, 04:38:04 PM »

Counting the 3 Big12 games, plus Fla Mich Gonz and GW....... our A/TO ratio is 1.26

those 7 opp are .90

kso_FAN · « **Reply #43 on:** January 20, 2013, 01:57:02 PM »

Overall per 100 rankings.

Big 12 only per 100 rankings (through 4 games).

Stevesie60 · « **Reply #44 on:** January 20, 2013, 02:11:22 PM »

The Big 12 addition is great. Thanks, _FAN.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #45 on:** January 20, 2013, 02:12:37 PM »

Angel is a big stud.

ChiComCat · « **Reply #46 on:** January 20, 2013, 02:22:18 PM »

HBBIQ Question: How is the motion O effecting McOreb's orebs? Haven't been able to watch them play enough to form my own conclusion.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #47 on:** January 20, 2013, 02:27:01 PM »

Quote from: ChiCat on January 20, 2013, 02:22:18 PM

HBBIQ Question: How is the motion O effecting McOreb's orebs? Haven't been able to watch them play enough to form my own conclusion.

His Oboarding per 100 possessions is about the same as it was last year, but its still early. It is down in Big 12 play, but so is everyone else's.

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #48 on:** January 20, 2013, 06:48:44 PM »

Angel -- 22 ast/8 TO, Will 10/1, Tay 14/6

Angel and Tay = 16 combined steals

Rod and Shane = 21-42 3pt (50%)

SwiftCat · « **Reply #49 on:** January 21, 2013, 11:38:30 AM »

Shane's 3 point shooting has been such a nice surprise this year. Didn't see that coming at all.