Author Topic: Piers Morgan  (Read 5103 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kstatefreak42

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2911
    • View Profile
Piers Morgan
« on: January 12, 2013, 01:13:11 PM »
Has been getting his salad tossed al week. Arguing emotion over fact.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
EMAW

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22787
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2013, 01:31:49 PM »
Has been getting his salad tossed al week. Arguing emotion over fact.
if you're referring to that interview with that guy who wrote "bullies," then you're absolutely wrong. 


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline eastcat

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2502
  • Labeled by children.
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2013, 01:53:53 PM »
Has been getting his salad tossed al week. Arguing emotion over fact.
if you're referring to that interview with that guy who wrote "bullies," then you're absolutely wrong.

You mean the one where Morgan was citing completely fraudulent "statistics"?

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22787
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2013, 01:54:58 PM »
Has been getting his salad tossed al week. Arguing emotion over fact.
if you're referring to that interview with that guy who wrote "bullies," then you're absolutely wrong.

You mean the one where Morgan was citing completely fraudulent "statistics"?
maybe? 

which statistics were fraudulent? 


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline eastcat

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2502
  • Labeled by children.
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2013, 02:16:09 PM »
Has been getting his salad tossed al week. Arguing emotion over fact.
if you're referring to that interview with that guy who wrote "bullies," then you're absolutely wrong.

You mean the one where Morgan was citing completely fraudulent "statistics"?
maybe? 

which statistics were fraudulent?



The U.K. has a higher violent crime rate than South Africa. We should totally follow their lead.

Offline Paul Moscow

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1844
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2013, 02:19:58 PM »
Has been getting his salad tossed al week. Arguing emotion over fact.
if you're referring to that interview with that guy who wrote "bullies," then you're absolutely wrong.

You mean the one where Morgan was citing completely fraudulent "statistics"?
maybe? 

which statistics were fraudulent?



The U.K. has a higher violent crime rate than South Africa. We should totally follow their lead.

 :lol: Sweet news program there, eastcat.

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2013, 02:43:14 PM »
People wanting to deport him for his opinion are rough ridin' stupid

Offline eastcat

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2502
  • Labeled by children.
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2013, 05:06:41 PM »
Has been getting his salad tossed al week. Arguing emotion over fact.
if you're referring to that interview with that guy who wrote "bullies," then you're absolutely wrong.

You mean the one where Morgan was citing completely fraudulent "statistics"?
maybe? 

which statistics were fraudulent?



The U.K. has a higher violent crime rate than South Africa. We should totally follow their lead.

 :lol: Sweet news program there, eastcat.

Thanks man, made it myself.

Offline Shacks

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1829
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2013, 05:48:00 PM »
People wanting to deport him for his opinion are rough ridin' stupid

Agreed.  I'm very pro-gun, but I'm also pro-Constitution and anti-logical fallacy.  The First Amendment gives Piers Morgan the right to bitch about the Second Amendment.  A ton of pissed off overemotional rednecks conveniently overlooked the "freedom of speech" and "freedom of the press" portion of the Constitution they claim to love so dearly.

That being said, Morgan is ignoring facts in order to argue his agenda.  He's also an bad person - if I, as an American, hosted a news show in another country, I wouldn't argue that their civil rights should be taken away and that their most treasured legal document is wrong.


Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88589
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #9 on: January 12, 2013, 07:03:23 PM »
I'm also pro-Constitution

will you still be when we change it again or just pro-this version?

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18075
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #10 on: January 12, 2013, 07:10:56 PM »
What does 2nd highest crime rate in the EU have to do with the US or guns?  Why does the US side not state a similar stat instead of completely unrelated? That graphic is a joke (on its own, maybe it makes sense in context with what Piers said)

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #11 on: January 12, 2013, 07:18:50 PM »
america looks like a bunch of pussies trying to ban guns just because a couple of mass shootings.

Offline Shacks

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1829
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #12 on: January 12, 2013, 07:28:59 PM »
I'm also pro-Constitution

will you still be when we change it again or just pro-this version?

Depends on the change, although probably yes.  I don't see the US ever doing something as dumb as adding an amendment for prohibition again, or repealing something like the 13th Amendment.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22787
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #13 on: January 12, 2013, 07:40:54 PM »
I'm so pro constitution and 2nd amendment that i think every citizen in the US should be allowed, maybe even required, to own and use a musket just in case we all have to form a people's army to defend ourselves against an external threat.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #14 on: January 12, 2013, 07:56:21 PM »
What does 2nd highest crime rate in the EU have to do with the US or guns?  Why does the US side not state a similar stat instead of completely unrelated? That graphic is a joke (on its own, maybe it makes sense in context with what Piers said)

It is intended to show that banning guns does not equal an end to crime.  But you knew that.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #15 on: January 12, 2013, 08:22:48 PM »
I'm so pro constitution and 2nd amendment that i think every citizen in the US should be allowed, maybe even required, to own and use a musket just in case we all have to form a people's army to defend ourselves against an external threat.

That is a good point, dlew.  People are conveniently forgetting about aliens and the threat they pose to the human race.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18075
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #16 on: January 12, 2013, 08:36:02 PM »
What does 2nd highest crime rate in the EU have to do with the US or guns?  Why does the US side not state a similar stat instead of completely unrelated? That graphic is a joke (on its own, maybe it makes sense in context with what Piers said)

It is intended to show that banning guns does not equal an end to crime.  But you knew that.

Anybody who thinks banning guns ends crime is stupid.  My point is that it is trying to make a comparison between countries using information that does not correlate from one country to the other. 

Also, if you pick the right statistic you can say what you want.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/12/14/schoo-shooting-how-do-u-s-gun-homicides-compare-with-the-rest-of-the-world/

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #17 on: January 12, 2013, 08:43:50 PM »
What does 2nd highest crime rate in the EU have to do with the US or guns?  Why does the US side not state a similar stat instead of completely unrelated? That graphic is a joke (on its own, maybe it makes sense in context with what Piers said)

It is intended to show that banning guns does not equal an end to crime.  But you knew that.

Anybody who thinks banning guns ends crime is stupid.  My point is that it is trying to make a comparison between countries using information that does not correlate from one country to the other. 

Also, if you pick the right statistic you can say what you want.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/12/14/schoo-shooting-how-do-u-s-gun-homicides-compare-with-the-rest-of-the-world/

who said that banning guns ends crime?  are you stupid?  why are you talking about something no one said?

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18075
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #18 on: January 12, 2013, 09:16:33 PM »
What does 2nd highest crime rate in the EU have to do with the US or guns?  Why does the US side not state a similar stat instead of completely unrelated? That graphic is a joke (on its own, maybe it makes sense in context with what Piers said)

It is intended to show that banning guns does not equal an end to crime.  But you knew that.

Anybody who thinks banning guns ends crime is stupid.  My point is that it is trying to make a comparison between countries using information that does not correlate from one country to the other. 

Also, if you pick the right statistic you can say what you want.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/12/14/schoo-shooting-how-do-u-s-gun-homicides-compare-with-the-rest-of-the-world/

who said that banning guns ends crime?  are you stupid?  why are you talking about something no one said?

Can you read the post that I quoted saying that it was meant to show that banning guns does not equal an end to crime?  I was saying anyone that argued otherwise is stupid.  Now that I drew that completely logical link and explicitly wrote it out for you, can you follow the logic or is your capacity beneath that of a 6 year old?

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #19 on: January 12, 2013, 09:22:50 PM »
I'm so pro constitution and 2nd amendment that i think every citizen in the US should be allowed, maybe even required, to own and use a musket just in case we all have to form a people's army to defend ourselves against an external threat.

The musket was the AR-15 of it's day.

Offline p1k3

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2555
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #20 on: January 12, 2013, 11:40:04 PM »
What does 2nd highest crime rate in the EU have to do with the US or guns?  Why does the US side not state a similar stat instead of completely unrelated? That graphic is a joke (on its own, maybe it makes sense in context with what Piers said)

It is intended to show that banning guns does not equal an end to crime.  But you knew that.

Anybody who thinks banning guns ends crime is stupid.  My point is that it is trying to make a comparison between countries using information that does not correlate from one country to the other. 

Also, if you pick the right statistic you can say what you want.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/12/14/schoo-shooting-how-do-u-s-gun-homicides-compare-with-the-rest-of-the-world/

who said that banning guns ends crime?  are you stupid?  why are you talking about something no one said?

because the the left wing losers in la la land think that gun confiscation will lead to pure peaceful Barry B utopia.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22787
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #21 on: January 12, 2013, 11:48:04 PM »
because the the left wing losers in la la land think that gun confiscation will lead to pure peaceful Barry B utopia.
nobody actually thinks that and framing the argument as if people do just muddies the entire conversation up more than it already is


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #22 on: January 13, 2013, 12:04:24 AM »
Besides this guy, I've never known anyone named "Piers."

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #23 on: January 13, 2013, 12:07:50 AM »
I'm so pro constitution and 2nd amendment that i think every citizen in the US should be allowed, maybe even required, to own and use a musket just in case we all have to form a people's army to defend ourselves against an external threat.

The musket was the AR-15 of it's day.

Very valid point.   Unless you're an idiot and just assume no harm will ever come to US citizens as long as we just give up our arms.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22787
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Piers Morgan
« Reply #24 on: January 13, 2013, 12:11:50 AM »
I'm so pro constitution and 2nd amendment that i think every citizen in the US should be allowed, maybe even required, to own and use a musket just in case we all have to form a people's army to defend ourselves against an external threat.

The musket was the AR-15 of it's day.

Very valid point.   Unless you're an idiot and just assume no harm will ever come to US citizens as long as we just give up our arms.
Now what's the modern day equivalent to "a well regulated militia"?


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]