I mean I get it and all with our shitty schedule, but there isn't asingle bracketology out there with our names on it. I'm like talking "next four out" after the first four out kinda stuff. Pretty weird for a 9-1 club.
so do you get it with our shitty schedule or not? because when reading the first part of your post, i thought you did. but then i read the second part of your post and i decided that you didn't.
signed,
confused poster in KC
Well yeah, I get it, but there's been similar teams in the past (ex. Last Year South Carolina team) which were still projected and had played no one. I'm guessing they thought those teams would continue to do well in the conference, but they're assuming we won't?
i don't have time to sys/kenpom it up but last year's usc schedule wasn't comparable to ours this year (this is a hypothesis)
by the time they reached their first loss they had beaten clemson, vandy, tulsa, memphis, st johns, auburn. they're low tier p5 but better than anything we've beaten.
and yeah, we're not going to do as well in the b12 as usc did in the sec rotation they had last year