Author Topic: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"  (Read 4492 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bunter

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 276
  • I'm not a good poster.
    • View Profile
    • Investigate 3/11
Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
« Reply #25 on: December 20, 2012, 10:09:38 PM »
I'm part of the the hire will be messed up and it's hard to be a cats fan camp  :frown:

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45937
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
« Reply #26 on: December 20, 2012, 11:18:33 PM »
Currie just made a huge investment with the press box because he knows it will pay off. He will do the same thing with a football coach and spend the money if he knows we will win.

We hired Bryce Wefald or whatever because basketball doesn't make any money and because there wasn't a high level coach available that was worth the investment.

Basketball does make money and draws donors.

Offline BWebbs0

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 261
    • View Profile
Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
« Reply #27 on: December 21, 2012, 03:44:54 AM »
Currie just made a huge investment with the press box because he knows it will pay off. He will do the same thing with a football coach and spend the money if he knows we will win.

We hired Bryce Wefald or whatever because basketball doesn't make any money and because there wasn't a high level coach available that was worth the investment.

Basketball does did make money and draws drew donors.
oscar Weber has the personality of a dead moth.

Will Spradling is an awful human being.

Offline 1863

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 389
  • John Currie is a beautiful human bean.
    • View Profile
Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
« Reply #28 on: December 21, 2012, 04:10:14 AM »
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.
oscar Webber is a prime example of what's to come
Football is King; we don't give a crap about BB.

Funny, since we are historically a Basketball school. But since this is historically is historically the football discussion board and not the basketball one I have to agree.

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13335
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
« Reply #29 on: December 21, 2012, 07:25:47 AM »
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.
oscar Webber is a prime example of what's to come
Football is King; we don't give a crap about BB.

Funny, since we are historically a Basketball school. But since this is historically is historically the football discussion board and not the basketball one I have to agree.
:lol: Yea, for many years we didn't give a crap about football... TGFS.  :love:

Thank God For Synder[/size]

« Last Edit: December 21, 2012, 07:33:33 AM by Katdaddy »
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline HerrSonntag

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3443
    • View Profile
Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
« Reply #30 on: December 21, 2012, 10:39:11 AM »
Thanks, LukeSonntag.

There's no pleasing some people

Offline unleashthemob

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 601
    • View Profile
Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
« Reply #31 on: December 22, 2012, 08:46:13 AM »
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.
oscar Webber is a prime example of what's to come
Football is King; we don't give a crap about BB.
wasn't the point...

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13335
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Magazine Ranks studdliest teams: K-State wins, wounders "who's Forbes?"
« Reply #32 on: December 22, 2012, 07:08:19 PM »
Guys, this is the same reason we will suck after Bill.  Currie/Shultz will point to this as a reason you don't have to spend money to be successful.  So they won't spend the money, and we will Paul Rhoads it up with some sucker who is willing to try hard for little money and we will get our 3 conf wins per year.
oscar Webber is a prime example of what's to come
Football is King; we don't give a crap about BB.
wasn't the point...
To be truthful, I always thought KSU was a joke during the so called BB days. I guess that was what I hated about not being any good in football and being dominated in BB by KU.   LHCBS gave us legit sport that we could win at, and beat the Squawks most of the time.  This feels good; and if JC doesn't hit a home run, we'll bench him permanently.
Hot time in Kat town tonight.