0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The Friday move happened, in part, to inconvenience the Chiefs less than a Saturday game.
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on March 06, 2013, 11:40:10 PMA 7 on 7 drill is just a pure passing drill. There really is no threat to run the ball, which takes away the enormous advantage that having Sams on the field instead of Waters presents. Receiver progression is not as important when you are a threat to take it to the house on any passing play. If the safeties have to respect the run, they are easier to beat over the top.this is as much of a goEMAW.com post as i've read on this internet bbs. it could also be a model gpc post, if gpc was as in love with sams as many of our posters are.
A 7 on 7 drill is just a pure passing drill. There really is no threat to run the ball, which takes away the enormous advantage that having Sams on the field instead of Waters presents. Receiver progression is not as important when you are a threat to take it to the house on any passing play. If the safeties have to respect the run, they are easier to beat over the top.
To be honest, I'm far more worried about losing Arthur and our stud Dline than Colin.
Lots of guys can be 7 on 7 heros and not be able to play, so take all of that with a grain of salt.The key for Sams will be development/ability to hit intermediate and deep throws in addition to what we already know he can do running the football. The key for Waters will be as a legitimate threat running the ball, and that is if the winter ball 7 on 7 tales are indeed true. Either way, we all need to wait until they both get the pads on and get to really compete in spring practice.
Quote from: ew2x4 on March 07, 2013, 10:25:44 AMTo be honest, I'm far more worried about losing Arthur and our stud Dline than Colin.Same here. The defense is really going to miss Arthur and his speed next year. I'm confident that the offense will still be good next year, but the defense will regress to 2010 quality.
what does bbs mean? i'm normally better at deducing acronyms here...but I give up on this one. TIA
Quote from: SPEmaw on March 07, 2013, 02:18:01 PMwhat does bbs mean? i'm normally better at deducing acronyms here...but I give up on this one. TIAhttp://lmgtfy.com/?q=www.gopowercat.com]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulletin_board_system
the thing is, the offensive staff doesn't exactly have a track record of completely changing the offense even when the qb isn't that mobile. which is why i think sams is still in good shape.
Quote from: emawblast on March 07, 2013, 11:04:40 AMthe thing is, the offensive staff doesn't exactly have a track record of completely changing the offense even when the qb isn't that mobile. which is why i think sams is still in good shape.Waters may be more "mobile" than some are assuming. We will see.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on March 08, 2013, 02:58:17 PMQuote from: emawblast on March 07, 2013, 11:04:40 AMthe thing is, the offensive staff doesn't exactly have a track record of completely changing the offense even when the qb isn't that mobile. which is why i think sams is still in good shape.Waters may be more "mobile" than some are assuming. We will see.I'm sure Waters can move, but I'm not sure if I've ever seen a QB with the kind of burst Sams has coming out of the pocket. I will be absolutely shocked if he is a better runner than Sams.
12-0You heard it here firstFYI, I've been right 2 years in a row as documented on goEMAW.
