Author Topic: WSJ joins bandwagon  (Read 3608 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
WSJ joins bandwagon
« on: November 16, 2012, 08:05:32 AM »


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline jde512

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2012, 08:20:02 AM »
Reading that article makes me proud to be EMAW!  The condescending tone aside, it's good to see the Cats discussed in mainstream media.  Most of the world has no idea how to deal with K-State because what we consider the norm: good, hard-working people who really don't give a crap about impressing anyone, is so foreign to the world they live in that their only reaction is to declare us an anomaly and hope that we'll go away soon.
I was born kicking and screaming and covered in someone else's blood.  I have no trouble going out the same way.

Offline The1BigWillie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3172
  • Known to be a horrible person... (BORN 7/4/75)
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2012, 08:23:45 AM »
They lost me at "Red State" and the political crap.

"That's what you get when you let some dude from Los Angles/Texas with the alias Mookfu raw dog it.  Willesgirl can back me up here.  There's a lesson in this.  You only get HIV once; make it count." - Mr. Bread

Offline wes mantooth

  • freak and stud
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4137
  • #LIFE is good
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2012, 08:24:25 AM »
silo tech?  clearly a squawk wrote this article.  :jerk:

Offline cvmcat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 257
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2012, 08:31:46 AM »
They lost me at "Red State" and the political crap.



Too bad you let your bias get in the way.  It was a pretty good article.

Offline yosh

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1003
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2012, 08:37:41 AM »
belongs in birther pit...

...also...

Luke_Fan! (first time I've done that   :billdance:)   


Offline Bloodfart

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5663
  • I don't run out of gas.
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2012, 08:41:18 AM »
Get off our nuts rest of the country.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2012, 08:43:49 AM »
belongs in birther pit...

...also...

Luke_Fan! (first time I've done that   :billdance:)   



Man, you can never check well enough for luking this season.

Offline Super PurpleCat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3555
  • purple hugs are back! get yours today
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2012, 09:06:27 AM »
Could've done with less red state blue state crap.

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8692
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #9 on: November 16, 2012, 09:09:38 AM »
Get off our nuts rest of the country.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #10 on: November 16, 2012, 10:25:30 AM »
Could've done with less red state blue state crap.

It is what it is

Offline wELLsculptedbrows

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 655
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #11 on: November 16, 2012, 10:27:32 AM »
I bet Joe Montgomery is behind this.

 :flush:

Offline Super PurpleCat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3555
  • purple hugs are back! get yours today
    • View Profile
Re: Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #12 on: November 16, 2012, 10:29:01 AM »
Could've done with less red state blue state crap.

It is what it is

Is it really that strange of a place?  The Alabama-A&M game might as well have been played on the planet Neocon but yet we get the simple prairie folk herp derp.

It is what it is.   :frown:

Offline Fuktard

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1092
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #13 on: November 16, 2012, 10:34:02 AM »
belongs in birther pit...

...also...

Luke_Fan! (first time I've done that   :billdance:)   



Man, you can never check well enough for luking this season.

It was my fault for posting the link in the "media hates us thread" which has now turned into "media begrudgingly accepts our world dominance" thread.

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7566
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #14 on: November 16, 2012, 11:02:06 AM »
I was amused at the use of urbane in describing any town in Kansas

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #15 on: November 16, 2012, 11:10:53 AM »
Could've done with less red state blue state crap.

It is what it is

Is it really that strange of a place?  The Alabama-A&M game might as well have been played on the planet Neocon but yet we get the simple prairie folk herp derp.

It is what it is.   :frown:

Well, Bama is already the big fancy elitist liberal institution in the state, and A&M wore flashy new uniforms. Plus I think A&M may have cured their small-penis syndrome when they joined the SEC. :frown:

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #16 on: November 16, 2012, 11:11:34 AM »
I was amused at the use of urbane in describing any town in Kansas

Yes, this is fantastic. "WE'RE ONLY 45 MINUTES FROM OLATHE! HOORAY!" - phog.net

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #17 on: November 16, 2012, 11:11:38 AM »
Quote
Too bad you let your bias get in the way.  It was a pretty good article.

Was it? What new insights did you glean from it? I'm sure it's a big hit on phog. And for eff's sake, Sam Brownback knows as much about football as he does about state budgeting, which is to say nothing.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #18 on: November 16, 2012, 11:20:42 AM »
It was so painfully obvious throughout that it was written by some ku bad person that got the assignment because he was "from Kansas". 

eff ku

 :jerk:
bears are fast...

Offline p1k3

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2555
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #19 on: November 16, 2012, 11:21:12 AM »
the comments :dubious:

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #20 on: November 16, 2012, 11:31:45 AM »
The south end of the mule is the end that kicks.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile

Offline SleepFighter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1965
  • I'll wait here for my Cherry Coke Zero.
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #22 on: November 16, 2012, 12:01:03 PM »
I read that whole article, but I don't think that I'm any closer to finding out what Kansas State says about America.

Offline Super PurpleCat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3555
  • purple hugs are back! get yours today
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #23 on: November 16, 2012, 01:27:21 PM »
I read that whole article, but I don't think that I'm any closer to finding out what Kansas State says about America.

I think it says America is full of peasants who grunt at each other approvingly while watching football games.   :dunno:

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: WSJ joins bandwagon
« Reply #24 on: November 16, 2012, 01:37:24 PM »
KU is larger?  Seems mis-leading since we're pretty much the same size.  We're like 200 students smaller this year and will pass them next year?