Author Topic: Injuries  (Read 54031 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #150 on: November 12, 2012, 06:57:13 PM »
Curry has a broken collar bone, had it pinned today.  TLBL should be back for UT.  Zimm is not good, high ankle sprain.  Source:  B+.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #151 on: November 12, 2012, 07:22:03 PM »
Bummer
:adios:

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #152 on: November 12, 2012, 07:25:49 PM »
I really would have expected more class out of a GP coached team.  Disappointing, really.
Now now. GMFP was nice enough to handcuff the offense so as not to derail his alma mater. That was our initiation fee apparently. From here on it is nothing but knee cappings. I bet Snyder retiring after this year is the other part of the bargain. True story. ;)

To be fair, GP didn't handcuff your offense, the FWPD did.  Well, that and a crippling heroin addiction.

Offline RightMeow

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 723
  • Wind it on up and bet the farm!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #153 on: November 12, 2012, 07:32:49 PM »
I like the way Fergie comes up and hits.  Pretty fast and usually puts a pretty loud hit on guys over the middle. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=O2gDe96jl4k#t=3058s

I am worried that he will get beat deep since Baylor's wide receivers are good.  It will be interesting to see how Tommy "long ball" Hayes decides to get after it.  Does he blitz our LBs a lot, forcing Florence to get rid of the ball quickly, forcing the short passes where we can come up and hit em?  Or does he sit back in a zone like a cover 3 and try to hide Fergie in the middle, letting him run around like a poor man's version of Thugman Polamalo so that Milo and the CCSF gang can protect the deep ball?  This will be fascinating to watch this weekend.  I kind of like the idea of Fergie roaming the middle of the field.  We need _Fan to break down the defensive schemes.  I'm getting pumped up thinking about it.
Is that Manhattan?  My God, it's beautiful!

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #154 on: November 12, 2012, 07:50:57 PM »
Terrence Williams :ohno:

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #155 on: November 12, 2012, 07:52:52 PM »
Terrence Williams :ohno:

he is going to have his way with our secondary

Offline shivvyman

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 325
  • Hates All Races Equally
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #156 on: November 12, 2012, 08:36:30 PM »
So, assuming Lockett and Sexton are out, who are the backup WRs?

When we go 5 wide, who is going to be in there with Harper, TT, and Miller?

Is Klein #6?

Harper and TT better be ready to ball. T-Hill is probably gonna get a few more looks too.

Offline Legit Elite

  • Resident Vanier Barber
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 589
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #157 on: November 12, 2012, 08:44:23 PM »
I dont see any reason why Harper can't go for 200+ with 3 tds this game.

And this is Hubert's homecoming so fingers crossed.
Free edge up to defensive starters when opponents held under 10.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Injuries
« Reply #158 on: November 12, 2012, 08:47:56 PM »
So, assuming Lockett and Sexton are out, who are the backup WRs?

When we go 5 wide, who is going to be in there with Harper, TT, and Miller?

Is Klein #6?

Harper and TT better be ready to ball. T-Hill is probably gonna get a few more looks too.

I think it would be fun to move Travis to WR and then dog whisperer would fill in TE

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #159 on: November 12, 2012, 09:03:52 PM »
why won't we just run klein up the middle 50 times.  5 yards and a cloud of turf.  baylor will never even get to touch the ball.  solves all the injury problems in one fell swoop.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #160 on: November 12, 2012, 09:04:16 PM »
So, assuming Lockett and Sexton are out, who are the backup WRs?

When we go 5 wide, who is going to be in there with Harper, TT, and Miller?

Is Klein #6?

Harper and TT better be ready to ball. T-Hill is probably gonna get a few more looks too.

we don't use 5 WR sets.

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #161 on: November 12, 2012, 09:14:52 PM »
So, assuming Lockett and Sexton are out, who are the backup WRs?

When we go 5 wide, who is going to be in there with Harper, TT, and Miller?

Is Klein #6?

Harper and TT better be ready to ball. T-Hill is probably gonna get a few more looks too.
we don't use 5 WR sets.

We run 5 wide with Klein in shotgun.  Usually it's a QB draw.  Is the 5th Tannahill or Hubert (if it's not a WR)?


« Last Edit: November 12, 2012, 09:30:20 PM by WildcatNkilt »
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #162 on: November 12, 2012, 09:27:03 PM »
We haven't run many 5-wide's since OU.  Don't remember any against WVU.  Maybe only once or twice on Saturday?

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #163 on: November 12, 2012, 09:31:18 PM »
We haven't run many 5-wide's since OU.  Don't remember any against WVU.  Maybe only once or twice on Saturday?

I feel like I see it at least once a game.  Most of the time it is a QB draw, except last time it was a pass and I was all  :surprised:
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #164 on: November 12, 2012, 09:41:29 PM »
The only game in Big 12 play that we didn't run at least one 5 WR formation was WVU. We've used it up to 9 times in a game (OU), but lately its just been 1 or 2 times a game. The majority of the time it is with 5 WRs, though I can think of at least 2-3 times where we split out a RB and/or TE with 3/4 WRs.

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #165 on: November 12, 2012, 09:45:50 PM »
The only game in Big 12 play that we didn't run at least one 5 WR formation was WVU. We've used it up to 9 times in a game (OU), but lately its just been 1 or 2 times a game. The majority of the time it is with 5 WRs, though I can think of at least 2-3 times where we split out a RB and/or TE with 3/4 WRs.

Thanks for validating _Fan.  It's like you and I are the only ones that pay attention to formations/plays.  Pretty disappointed in some of the posters above...disappointed indeed.
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #166 on: November 12, 2012, 09:50:55 PM »
The only game in Big 12 play that we didn't run at least one 5 WR formation was WVU. We've used it up to 9 times in a game (OU), but lately its just been 1 or 2 times a game. The majority of the time it is with 5 WRs, though I can think of at least 2-3 times where we split out a RB and/or TE with 3/4 WRs.

Thanks for validating _Fan.  It's like you and I are the only ones that pay attention to formations/plays.  Pretty disappointed in some of the posters above...disappointed indeed.

Disappointing that the information is on the blog. I chart every play and every formation for every game. That stuff I post on the blog isn't just made up out of thin air. All people have to do is look through _FANalysis and they can see it. (empty = 5 WRs)

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #167 on: November 12, 2012, 09:51:03 PM »
The only game in Big 12 play that we didn't run at least one 5 WR formation was WVU. We've used it up to 9 times in a game (OU), but lately its just been 1 or 2 times a game. The majority of the time it is with 5 WRs, though I can think of at least 2-3 times where we split out a RB and/or TE with 3/4 WRs.

Thanks for validating _Fan.  It's like you and I are the only ones that pay attention to formations/plays.  Pretty disappointed in some of the posters above...disappointed indeed.

_fan is lying, we don't use them.  sorry

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #168 on: November 12, 2012, 09:51:21 PM »
The only game in Big 12 play that we didn't run at least one 5 WR formation was WVU. We've used it up to 9 times in a game (OU), but lately its just been 1 or 2 times a game. The majority of the time it is with 5 WRs, though I can think of at least 2-3 times where we split out a RB and/or TE with 3/4 WRs.

Thanks for validating _Fan.  It's like you and I are the only ones that pay attention to formations/plays.  Pretty disappointed in some of the posters above...disappointed indeed.

We've all been disappointed with kim lately, nothing new.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #169 on: November 12, 2012, 09:52:42 PM »
The only game in Big 12 play that we didn't run at least one 5 WR formation was WVU. We've used it up to 9 times in a game (OU), but lately its just been 1 or 2 times a game. The majority of the time it is with 5 WRs, though I can think of at least 2-3 times where we split out a RB and/or TE with 3/4 WRs.

Thanks for validating _Fan.  It's like you and I are the only ones that pay attention to formations/plays.  Pretty disappointed in some of the posters above...disappointed indeed.

Disappointing that the information is on the blog. I chart every play and every formation for every game. That stuff I post on the blog isn't just made up out of thin air. All people have to do is look through _FANalysis and they can see it. (empty = 5 WRs)

its funny because i actually consulted your blog.  but you did not list whether or not the empty backfield set consisted of 4 WR and a TE or 5 WR.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #170 on: November 12, 2012, 09:56:08 PM »
The only game in Big 12 play that we didn't run at least one 5 WR formation was WVU. We've used it up to 9 times in a game (OU), but lately its just been 1 or 2 times a game. The majority of the time it is with 5 WRs, though I can think of at least 2-3 times where we split out a RB and/or TE with 3/4 WRs.

Thanks for validating _Fan.  It's like you and I are the only ones that pay attention to formations/plays.  Pretty disappointed in some of the posters above...disappointed indeed.

Disappointing that the information is on the blog. I chart every play and every formation for every game. That stuff I post on the blog isn't just made up out of thin air. All people have to do is look through _FANalysis and they can see it. (empty = 5 WRs)

its funny because i actually consulted your blog.  but you did not list whether or not the empty backfield set consisted of 4 WR and a TE or 5 WR.

Fair enough.

When I chart, I automatically check the personnel in empty sets and if there is a WR or RB in an empty set I chart it as a 1 RB formation with a TE, etc. So all the charts that say "empty" are 5 WR formations which you are correct, I did not say explicitly.

Offline ZmoneyKSU

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 795
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #171 on: November 13, 2012, 08:41:09 AM »
Someone on GPC claiming Zimmerman has either a broken Tibia or Fibula, and is out for the year.

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #172 on: November 13, 2012, 08:49:12 AM »
Hard to believe that..... 

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #173 on: November 13, 2012, 08:50:39 AM »
Someone on GPC claiming Zimmerman has either a broken Tibia or Fibula, and is out for the year.

The out for the year stuff is debatable, unless you meant he calendar year.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59571
    • View Profile
Re: Injuries
« Reply #174 on: November 13, 2012, 09:01:15 AM »
Sure am glad we got those last couple of option plays in last Saturday night.