Author Topic: Is every game from here on out the biggest game in K-State Football History? (Read 4244 times)

emawer · « **on:** October 30, 2012, 03:18:30 PM »

2003 big12 championship was huge, but these games can put us at that level plus more.

puniraptor · « **Reply #1 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:18:51 PM »

yosh · « **Reply #2 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:20:12 PM »

steve dave · « **Reply #3 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:20:51 PM »

yes, unless we lose one, then the next one is not so big

MadCat · « **Reply #4 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:21:08 PM »

Maybe

GoodForAnother · « **Reply #5 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:23:54 PM »

as far as what's at stake, probably

Stupid Fitz · « **Reply #6 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:25:20 PM »

MadCat · « **Reply #7 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:27:04 PM »

No pressure

cvmcat · « **Reply #8 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:30:29 PM »

This is where the pressure will get to teams of lesser character and what seperates the Cats from the pretenders. K-State just calmy takes care of business.

XocolateThundarr · « **Reply #9 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:44:52 PM »

Please reference "Nervous Shits" thread.

michigancat · « **Reply #10 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:47:27 PM »

Yes, all games from here on out are more important than the 1998 Big 12 Championship that would have put us in the BCS Title game if we had won. We lost that game in double overtime to texas a&m, in case you forgot.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #11 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:47:58 PM »

We're 8-0 and #2 in the BCS. They are all big now.

emawer · « **Reply #12 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:49:08 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on October 30, 2012, 03:47:27 PM

Yes, all games from here on out are more important than the 1998 Big 12 Championship that would have put us in the BCS Title game if we had won. We lost that game in double overtime to texas a&m, in case you forgot.

Yes but at the time we still needed UCLA to lose, in this case he techinically control our destiny.

puniraptor · « **Reply #13 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:50:41 PM »

regardless, it's bigger than 98 because now I am adult and not a child and I have the capacity to care 1000x more.

kim carnes · « **Reply #14 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:54:33 PM »

Quote from: emawer on October 30, 2012, 03:49:08 PM

Quote from: michigancat on October 30, 2012, 03:47:27 PM
Yes, all games from here on out are more important than the 1998 Big 12 Championship that would have put us in the BCS Title game if we had won. We lost that game in double overtime to texas a&m, in case you forgot.
Yes but at the time we still needed UCLA to lose, in this case he techinically control our destiny.

Except we don't control our destiny so....

EllToPay · « **Reply #15 on:** October 30, 2012, 03:55:10 PM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on October 30, 2012, 03:47:58 PM

We're 8-0 and #2 in the BCS. They are all big now.

jfc. can you say that again please?

Benja · « **Reply #16 on:** October 30, 2012, 04:09:18 PM »

Of course they are. Unless what stevedave said happens.

Ira Hayes · « **Reply #17 on:** October 30, 2012, 04:12:08 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on October 30, 2012, 03:47:27 PM

Yes, all games from here on out are more important than the 1998 Big 12 Championship that would have put us in the BCS Title game if we had won. We lost that game in double overtime to texas a&m, in case you forgot.

In 1998 we played a horrible OOC schedule and then only 4 conference games against bowl eligible teams. Then lost the CCG against a bowl eligible team.

Of those 4 conference games against bowl eligible teams, the only team we stomped was Texas. MU by 6, CU by 7, NU by 10 (late pick 6 to end it)

'98, while remembered fondly because we had never been close to that, has already been eclipsed by this year.

Benja · « **Reply #18 on:** October 30, 2012, 04:14:04 PM »

Quote from: Ira Hayes on October 30, 2012, 04:12:08 PM

Quote from: michigancat on October 30, 2012, 03:47:27 PM
Yes, all games from here on out are more important than the 1998 Big 12 Championship that would have put us in the BCS Title game if we had won. We lost that game in double overtime to texas a&m, in case you forgot.

In 1998 we played a horrible OOC schedule and then only 4 conference games against bowl eligible teams. Then lost the CCG against a bowl eligible team.

Of those 4 conference games against bowl eligible teams, the only team we stomped was Texas. MU by 6, CU by 7, NU by 10 (late pick 6 to end it)

'98, while remembered fondly because we had never been close to that, has already been eclipsed by this year.

hmmmm

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #19 on:** October 30, 2012, 04:39:08 PM »

There's a good chance that once the regular season is finished, we'll look at the AP/Coaches poll and see that K-State will have played as many as 5 Top 25 teams. Yes, several on that list right now are a little gimpy, but IF they get their season(s) back on track, they'll finish the regular season in the Top 25.

So yes, it's huge, huge, huge.

If K-State manages to win out, it's going to be effing impressive and I don't care what the Big 12 detractors say.

XocolateThundarr · « **Reply #20 on:** October 30, 2012, 04:45:03 PM »

I can't wait until Saturday. I am going to get to enjoy watching the #2 team in the nation with my two boys. I'm not getting crap done at work this week.

wazucat · « **Reply #21 on:** October 30, 2012, 06:01:09 PM »

http://outkickthecoverage.com/chances-bama-oregon-kansas-state-and-notre-dame-finish-undefeated-tiny.php

Sorry if Luked but this seems pertinent to the thread

Barry McCockner · « **Reply #22 on:** October 30, 2012, 06:17:30 PM »

Quote from: Ira Hayes on October 30, 2012, 04:12:08 PM

Quote from: michigancat on October 30, 2012, 03:47:27 PM
Yes, all games from here on out are more important than the 1998 Big 12 Championship that would have put us in the BCS Title game if we had won. We lost that game in double overtime to texas a&m, in case you forgot.

In 1998 we played a horrible OOC schedule and then only 4 conference games against bowl eligible teams. Then lost the CCG against a bowl eligible team.

Of those 4 conference games against bowl eligible teams, the only team we stomped was Texas. MU by 6, CU by 7, NU by 10 (late pick 6 to end it)

'98, while remembered fondly because we had never been close to that, has already been eclipsed by this year.

I've come around to agree. Also now think that, as a whole, this team is better than 98.

Winters · « **Reply #23 on:** October 30, 2012, 06:17:59 PM »

Yeah, I'll agree.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #24 on:** October 30, 2012, 06:22:27 PM »

Yeah, no disrespect to 98, but that team would be 7-1 by now. Maybe 6-2.